09:00:34 #startmeeting midonet 09:00:35 Meeting started Tue Dec 15 09:00:34 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ryu25. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'midonet' 09:01:08 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MidoNet agenda 09:01:17 #topic Announcements 09:03:00 since many will be unavailable due to the holidays in the upcoming weeks, I think it makes sense to cancel the meeting on the 29th and Jan 5th 09:03:32 there will be one next week 09:03:47 let me know if that makes sense to all 09:03:52 +1 09:04:06 sgtm 09:04:20 +1 09:04:35 #action ryu25 update the wiki about the cancelled meeetings 09:05:27 i don't have any other announcement. Anyone? 09:05:53 Is this a good place to announce bug deputy results? 09:06:20 kitsuneninetails: yes, the next topic will be about bugs 09:06:26 kk 09:06:56 moving on 09:07:00 #topic Bugs 09:07:38 kitsuneninetails: you were the Bug Deputy last week. Thanks for your effort! 09:08:00 do you have anything to share? 09:08:24 THere were 0 bugs opened during the last week, keeping the total at 3 09:08:47 The wiki has been updated: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MidoNet 09:09:19 thanks, that's great news 09:10:45 does anyone want to volunteer to be the next Bug Deputy? 09:11:42 I will volunteer for this week 09:12:28 #info ryu25 is the next Bug Deputy 09:13:25 ok since we don't have any new bug to discuss, let's move on 09:13:32 #topic Open Discussion 09:14:14 One topic that is being discussed in the ML is about python-midonetclient 09:15:02 i hope my proposal, while probably not satisfying everyone, provides a good compromise, to at least remove the dependency of PMC from the plugin 09:15:08 i'm open to suggestions 09:15:17 +1 for ryu's proposal 09:16:30 still +1 from me :) 09:16:34 however, as people against separation doesn't seem to be here, let's continue it on ML 09:16:34 I will leave the actual task to those requesting the separation :) 09:16:45 yamamoto: sure 09:18:09 yould probably also good if you could follow up with what's planned to happen with the cli, ryu25 09:18:13 on the ml 09:18:30 seems that was unclear 09:19:11 red|trela: you are referring to the high level client right? No the existing cli 09:19:42 okay, maybe I'm just lust in terminology here 09:20:21 I was referring to the cli mentioned by Jaume and Toni on the ml...which I understood to be the "existing cli"... 09:20:26 I will respond to the thread 09:20:33 i think it should clear things up 09:20:58 sounds good 09:22:09 right I was suggesting that for now, we may not need a separate client project, but they have grand ideas for the future :) 09:22:43 there is no other topic I need to bring up. Anyone else? 09:23:21 nothing from me 09:24:00 nothing from me either 09:24:09 I'm good 09:25:14 ok great, thanks for attending everyone! 09:25:24 #endmeeting