04:00:20 #startmeeting masakari 04:00:21 Meeting started Tue Jan 23 04:00:20 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is samP. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 04:00:21 hi 04:00:22 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 04:00:25 The meeting name has been set to 'masakari' 04:00:25 Hi 04:00:59 hi 04:01:14 hi all 04:01:19 lets start 04:01:32 #topic Critical Bugs 04:01:48 Any bugs to discuss? 04:02:06 or patches? 04:02:22 change service type from ha to instance-ha 04:02:28 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:fix_service_type+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 04:02:45 Refer to masakari related patches 04:02:56 Please review above patches 04:03:28 tpatil: OK, thank you for creating patches. 04:03:48 tpatil: Dinesh_Bhor* thank you for fix 04:04:31 should we merge Monty's patch first? 04:04:37 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534878/ 04:04:55 I think so 04:05:32 rkmrHonjo: Did you confirm Monty's patch is working correctly with newer version of openstacksdk? 04:06:24 tpatil: I'm confirming Monty's patch with current version of openstack sdk now. 04:06:56 sorry, wrong link above 04:06:58 Does the current version contains resource2/proxy2 migration changes? 04:07:03 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534883/ 04:07:04 But, in my understanding, the next version openstacksdk that will be removed proxy2/resource2 is not released yet. 04:07:20 Ah, please wait. 04:08:42 rkmrHonjo: If current master has proxy2/resource2 removed, then you should check it with current master. not with released ones. 04:08:59 Maybe need to use 0.10.0 version of openstacksdk 04:09:14 samP: OK. I check it. 04:10:03 And, I will send the result of it to ML. 04:10:24 rkmrHonjo: thank you. 04:10:35 current one used is 0.9.19, https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/upper-constraints.txt#L412 04:11:04 tpatil: Thanks. 04:11:22 rkmrHonjo: Once you have confirm it's working correctly with 0.10.0, let's merge Monty's patch first 04:12:14 tpatil: I got it. 04:12:19 rkmrHonjo: please comment your result to gerrit 04:12:26 ok. 04:12:29 rkmrHonjo: thanks 04:13:00 any toher bugs or patches to discuss? 04:13:12 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516577/ Fix masakari query remote node state 04:13:15 s/toher/other 04:13:53 Hieu(author of this patch) needs reviews. I'm reviewing this patch, and please review it if you can. 04:15:31 rkmrHonjo: I will. but this take some time. Because, this patch need to verify. 04:16:20 rkmrHonjo: I will do this 04:16:34 samP: ok, thanks. 04:17:07 Another patch needs review 04:17:12 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528647/ 04:17:36 this is a initial cookie cutter patch for masakari-dashboard 04:18:20 tpatil: done 04:18:36 ok, thank you 04:19:19 ls 04:19:24 sorry 04:19:44 any other bugs or patches? 04:20:10 if not let's move to discussion. if any please bring them up any time. 04:20:19 #topic Discussion Points 04:21:47 In ML, Waines Greg sends some questions about Masakari CLI 04:22:41 Initially Dinesh_Bhor was answering those questions. (thank you for that) 04:23:15 Will Dinesh_Bhor able support Greg for new questions? 04:23:28 samP: I still need to reproduce his other problem which he has requested 04:24:07 Dinesh_Bhor: OK, thanks. 04:24:07 samP: Yes, will do. 04:24:30 please let me know if you need any help on this. 04:24:42 Was Dinesh's mail sent to dev-ML? I didn't receive it. 04:26:32 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126446.html 04:26:33 rkmrHonjo: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125366.html 04:27:44 He has asked his configuring masakari problem in private mail thread as well. 04:28:46 samP: Thanks. 04:29:29 Dinesh_Bhor: rkmrHonjo: Thank you for supporting Greg 04:30:58 And, if it is difficult for you to handle private mails, please send them to ML. 04:32:41 OK, then, 04:32:58 (1) Horizon Plugin 04:33:11 Just approved the init patch for the repo 04:33:51 I think it's too late to push patches for queens cycle 04:34:34 tpatil: true. 04:34:39 The initial plan was to provide support to add failover segment and host in queens cycle. I will request Niraj to submit patches if it's ready 04:36:12 tpatil: thanks. if those are ready, are you going to push them for Queens? 04:36:24 or next release? 04:36:52 It's better to postpone it to the next release 04:38:03 tpatil: OK. Then we have to consider exclude that repo from release 04:38:07 Because I don't know whether he has written unit tests for the code changes 04:38:43 tpatil: sure, no problem. 04:38:54 samP: correct, there is no point to include masakari-dashboard in the queens release 04:39:43 if code ready, just push them and lets review. we still have little bit of time before deciding what to release 04:40:35 samP: Ok 04:41:14 tpatil: I will take required action to exclude masakari-dashboard from Queens (if we decide so) 04:41:22 tpatil: thanks 04:41:45 (2) Install Guide docs 04:41:55 just one left. 04:42:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534878/ 04:42:33 ^^ thanks to Monty docs will be published. 04:42:51 (3) recovery method customization 04:44:11 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522219/1 04:44:12 samP: Will be postpone to the next release 04:44:20 tpatil: sure 04:44:58 We still need to merge #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522219 04:45:41 (4) Queens Work Items 04:46:04 No update 04:46:15 (5) Ansible support for Masakari 04:47:09 I still struggling to publish my playbooks. I will do that asap. 04:47:45 samP: Okay, Thank you 04:47:51 samP: Ok, Dinesh will start understanding Ansible plugin framework in the meantime 04:48:04 I think we need to create a BP on OSA. 04:48:59 samP: Will do it in this week 04:49:23 We have to create that BP when we start to implement our playbooks. I will give more details on this later 04:49:44 samP: Ok, Thank you 04:49:59 (6)Call Force down API when host-failure will be notified 04:50:11 I think that we have discussed enough about it. Sorry, I didn't update wiki page. 04:50:31 rkmrHonjo: correct...sorry 04:50:59 I think we do not have any updates for other items. 04:51:04 #topic AOB 04:51:21 Any other topics? 04:51:24 Additional information about Monty's patch: resource2/proxy2 will be removed by this patch and related patches. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533826/ 04:51:35 And, these patchets are not merged yet. 04:51:46 s/patchets/patches/ 04:51:59 So I think that we could merge Monty's patch if it works with current openstack-sdk. Just in case, I test the patch with openstakc-sdk 0.9.19 and 0.10.0. 04:52:17 In this file, resource2/proxy2 will be removed in openstack-sdk 1.0. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535860/2/openstack/proxy2.py 04:53:28 rkmrHonjo: thanks for info 04:57:55 sorry, I was searching for this mail. 04:58:01 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126421.html 04:58:45 We should consider Monty's suggestion here 04:59:04 No them left today, Let discuss this on ML 04:59:13 ok. 04:59:17 please use ML or #openstack-masakari for further discussion 04:59:21 samP: Ok 04:59:22 thank you all.. 04:59:30 #endmeeting