15:00:14 <carloss> #startmeeting manila
15:00:15 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Feb  8 15:00:14 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:15 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:15 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'manila'
15:00:22 <carthaca> hi
15:00:30 <vhari> hi
15:00:34 <gireesh> hi
15:00:35 <carloss> courtesy ping: dviroel gouthamr  msaravan pulluri
15:00:37 <jayaanand> hi
15:00:42 <gouthamr> o/
15:01:00 <nenad0711[m]> hi
15:01:26 <dviroel> o/
15:01:59 <kpdev> hi
15:03:19 <carloss> o/ hello everyone
15:03:38 <carloss> our meeting agenda for today:
15:03:40 <carloss> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting
15:03:48 <carloss> #topic Announcements
15:03:55 <carloss> Schedule and Deadlines:
15:04:00 <carloss> #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html
15:04:35 <msaravan> Hi
15:05:10 * carloss waves at msaravan
15:05:49 <carloss> so we're 3 weeks away from feature freeze
15:07:07 <carloss> and we're 1 week past feature proposal freeze
15:07:15 <carloss> is there a feature you're still willing to propose to gerrit?
15:07:53 <carloss> I think it would be important for reviewers to get started with the changes
15:08:12 <carloss> we can try to do something as we did in the past: merge things as early as we can
15:08:43 <kpdev> i have spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/898999, but I dont think implementation will be merged by freeze
15:09:08 <carloss> I think gireesh and jayaanand are pursuing two features... do you have updates? :)
15:09:34 <carloss> > i have spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/898999, but I dont think implementation will be merged by freeze
15:09:34 <carloss> kpdev: yeah, I think we're short in time to merge the spec and get the implementation merged for this cycle
15:09:55 <carloss> we can continue pursuing the spec though and merge it as early as we can, and then we can have the implementation coming on the next cycle
15:10:06 <gireesh> I got few comment from Goutham, need some time to incorporate those. will push my changes by Tuesday
15:11:03 <msaravan> Basically, Gireesh is trying to put backup_type to manila.conf which is requested by gouthamr  and also acknowledged earlier by carthaca
15:12:00 <msaravan> So, that's in progress right now.. carloss ;     @gireesh you want to share the etherpad link here , so that other folks can refer
15:12:39 <gireesh> https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-share-backup
15:12:43 <jayaanand> I will submit my change tomorrow
15:13:22 <carloss> msaravan gireesh jayaanand: thank you for sharing! :)
15:13:57 <gireesh> thanks @carloss
15:15:00 <jayaanand> thank you! @carloss
15:15:29 <carloss> awesome, ty
15:15:46 <carloss> that's all I had in terms of announcements
15:15:52 <carloss> do you have an announcement to share with us?
15:17:19 <msaravan> thank you carloss . .. On NetApp CI, DHSS=False suite is passing and only one used to fail. I have the setup fix ready, and I'll incorporate that.  For DHSS=True suite, I am triaging them suite by suite, and hoping to fix them soon.
15:19:06 <carloss> msaravan: great news
15:19:12 <carloss> thanks for letting us know
15:19:29 <carloss> having third party CI voting on the changes is very important for us
15:20:21 <msaravan> thank you. ack.
15:20:38 <carloss> so we appreciate the efforts to have it working :)
15:21:43 <carloss> #topic Review Focus
15:22:41 <carloss> so continuing to talk about third party drivers, it's been a while since we don't check the ones that are reporting CI
15:23:10 <carloss> the Tegile driver is one of them, and it is not reporting the CI outputs for a while now
15:23:24 <carloss> so tkajinam proposed a deprecation warning to the driver
15:23:26 <carloss> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/907377
15:23:55 <carloss> and we'll be looking closely at other drivers that are not reporting CI results and didn't have maintainers around for a while
15:25:14 <carloss> I'll attempt reaching out and mention that, but I think we will end up adding deprecation warnings to a some drivers
15:25:52 <carloss> I'll keep bringing it up in the future
15:26:14 <gouthamr> +1 if we round up all such drivers, we can add one release note mentioning them all and send an email to openstack-discuss seeking maintainers to rectify them.
15:28:08 <carloss> ++
15:28:36 <carloss> so for review focus we have merged a couple of things
15:28:50 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-caracal-review-focus (Caracal review focus etherpad)
15:30:21 <carloss> a couple of fixes still need some reviews
15:30:56 <carloss> kpdev_: I intend to have an initial review in the deferred deletion change soon... thank you for working on this feature
15:31:20 <carloss> I saw there was still some conversations in the spec between you and gouthamr
15:31:48 <carloss> maybe we can take those to the implementation when possible :)
15:32:27 <carloss> we need some more reviewers in the deferred deletion spec though... anyone willing to volunteer?
15:33:07 <kpdev_> yes, few of the suggestions added in implementation
15:34:10 <carloss> great :)
15:34:45 <carloss> ashrodri jayaanand msaravan gireesh: can I have your eyes on the deferred deletion patches?
15:34:55 <msaravan> yes, will do it carloss
15:34:58 <jayaanand> sure
15:35:34 <carloss> tyvm :D
15:37:21 <carloss> that's all I had for review focus... is there another change you'd like to bring up?
15:37:33 * carloss remembers the paramiko conditional import
15:37:45 <carloss> would be nice if we could have some extra eyes here ^ as well
15:39:48 <carloss> alright
15:39:52 <carloss> next topic...
15:40:12 <carloss> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug Triage etherpad)
15:40:17 <carloss> grr
15:40:20 <vhari> :)
15:40:21 <carloss> #topic Bug Triage
15:40:28 <vhari> ty carloss
15:40:28 <carloss> vhari: floor is yours :D
15:40:34 <vhari> :D
15:40:43 <vhari> let's dive in then
15:40:45 <vhari> nk https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2051877
15:41:34 <vhari> do we know if this is a regression
15:42:04 <vhari> and pls provide logs if still available
15:42:10 <carloss> I think this is a complicated thing and I tested something similar in the past
15:42:20 <carloss> the steps to reproduce would likely be important
15:42:27 <carloss> in the scenario I tested in the past, I:
15:43:28 <carloss> - created a share, using a share type that had snapshot support but didn't have create share from snapshot support
15:43:28 <carloss> - modified the share type and set create share from snapshot support to True
15:43:28 <carloss> - attempted to create a share from snapshot
15:43:35 <carloss> I think this was the case I tried and failed
15:43:50 <carloss> but it's a thing from yeeeears ago
15:45:18 <carloss> so that's why I'm curious... did this share type already had create share from snapshot support set to True when the share was created?
15:47:00 <gouthamr> The scheduler doesn’t cache anything about a share type… so that scenario shouldn’t occur ^
15:48:05 <carloss> this scenario should be easy to test, so I could try to re-reproduce
15:48:32 <carloss> but if there was something wrong, after all this years, I think there's a chance this has changed
15:48:46 <carloss> but I think for this bug specifically, would be nice to ask for some scheduler logs
15:48:51 <carloss> and the steps to reproduce
15:50:15 <carloss> any other suggestions? :)
15:50:42 <carloss> I'll ping in the bug
15:50:53 <vhari> carloss++
15:51:06 <vhari> next up
15:51:08 <vhari> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2049528
15:52:27 <vhari> is this reproducible? if so pls provide recreate steps and logs if available
15:53:10 <carloss> "2024-01-12 20:59:38.489 7 ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.server sqlalchemy.exc.InvalidRequestError: Entity namespace for "coalesce(anon_1.share_gigabytes, :coalesce_1)" has no property "topic""
15:53:17 <carloss> curious 🤔
15:54:45 <gouthamr> since this scheduler driver is turned off by default, I wouldn’t doubt it to be untested/broken. I think having a cephfs backend has little to do with this…
15:56:19 <gouthamr> vhari: I can pick this up; priority can be medium; and we can target rc1 … I’ll try to reproduce it, if i can’t, I’ll pose some questions
15:56:41 <vhari> gouthamr++ ack
15:56:47 <carloss> ++
15:56:53 <carloss> ty gouthamr
15:57:05 <vhari> so that's all the time we have for bugs today folks
15:57:14 <vhari> thanks for pitching in as always
15:58:01 <carloss> tyvm for bringing up these bugs vhari
15:58:06 <vhari> yw carloss
15:58:13 <carloss> alright, let's wrap up
15:58:18 <carloss> thank you for joining
15:58:23 <carloss> let's get back to #openstack-manila
15:58:28 <carloss> #endmeeting