15:00:21 #startmeeting manila 15:00:21 Meeting started Thu Jan 18 15:00:21 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:00:31 o/ 15:01:05 o/ hello! 15:01:25 courtesy ping: dviroel gouthamr carthaca msaravan 15:01:28 hi 15:03:00 * carloss waits a bit to get more quorum :) 15:04:28 o/ 15:05:55 alright, smaller crowd than usual, but let's get started 15:06:00 hello everyone 15:06:02 and welcome 15:06:11 today's meeting agenda: 15:06:16 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting 15:06:49 #topic Announcements 15:07:19 Schedule and Deadlines: 15:07:27 #link #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html (Caracal release schedule) 15:07:36 we're past m-2 15:08:17 and we are ~40 days away from m-3 15:08:24 ^ a bit scary to think like this 15:08:39 time is flying, there's a ton going on on this cycle 15:10:05 ACK 15:10:38 so now it's a lot of work on the development of features so that we can get everything merged in time 15:12:29 so in terms of schedule, that's what I wanted to mention 15:12:35 and there's another announcement: 15:12:43 the D release name is defined! 15:12:53 #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/3OZILLG26HZ3KEDHGPB2HUDZ72WPP4JJ (D release name announcement) 15:13:07 so Dalmatian was the name that won the polls! 15:13:29 so we managed to keep the animal names going 15:14:35 thank you everyone for casting your votes 15:14:58 that's all I had for $topic. Do you have an announcement to share with us? :) 15:16:55 taking silence as no 15:17:01 #topic Review Focus 15:17:24 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-caracal-review-focus (Review Focus etherpad) 15:19:02 the spec freeze was supposed to happen in the previous week... 15:20:07 but was there was a lot going on, we didn't get a lot of review traction in the specs and it was fair to get us more time 15:20:14 one of the specs is now merged 15:20:50 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/901700 (Shares/Snapshots deferred deletion) 15:21:06 and there's another spec that we are still targeting: 15:21:28 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/898999 (Spec for share encryption) 15:21:40 I think we’re close with the encryption one… I see that no one has issues with the broad strokes. There’s some questions online for kpdev to answer/expand upon 15:22:27 ++ 15:24:01 gouthamr, haixin, carthaca, jayaanand, msaravan: thank you for the reviews on the specs! 15:24:08 that's really valuable input 15:24:24 ++ 15:25:14 for the latter spec, I think it's a matter of hashing out the discussion points we brought up 15:26:06 and thank you kpdev for working on this and pushing the updates quickly :) 15:26:15 is there any other change you'd like to bring up? 15:28:31 alright, on to the next topic... 15:28:34 #topic Stable branches backports needing attention 15:29:54 * carloss grabbing some links 15:30:06 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/2023.1+status:open 15:30:06 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/zed+status:open 15:30:06 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/yoga+status:open 15:30:06 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/xena+status:open 15:30:06 https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/manila+branch:stable/wallaby+status:open 15:30:18 so these are the open branches that have some open fixes against them 15:30:20 first off, a huge number of back ports merged over the last couple of weeks; thanks carloss ashrodri and everyone else that reviewed 15:33:39 i think we’re waiting for NetApp maintainers on many of the pending ones - the CI isn’t working, so we want to be sure we won’t be breaking the driver here… 15:34:43 Good news is that, the systems are up, and we are working on restoring all the ONTAP select boxes. 15:34:58 Expecting all should be up and running, next week. 15:35:41 If its not there, we found a solution of bringing other ontap boxes into CI. We'll follow either one of that, and fix the CI issue. 15:36:03 Sorry for the inconvenience caused !! 15:37:38 nice thanks for the update msaravan ! That’s good news indeed 15:38:53 ++, good news... and no worries 15:39:10 msaravan: if the CI continues to have troubles with older stable branches, we’d still be fine if you reviewed and +1ed the change… 15:39:11 CI voting on stable branches is a nice to have, but not a must have 15:40:13 Sure 15:40:36 yep, +1 in the changes always helps getting them merged 15:41:46 gouthamr: thank you for backporting changes tirelessly 15:42:09 I am trying to get some more changes merged before I tag releases 15:42:21 but I'd like to tag new releases by tomorrow 15:42:30 there's a good amount of fixes that already landed on stable branches 15:42:40 so worth a release :) 15:42:58 anything else you'd like to bring up related to $topic? 15:44:39 thank you for bringing this up, gouthamr 15:44:44 on to the next topic... 15:44:46 #topic Bug Triage (carloss) 15:44:51 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug Triage etherpad) 15:46:21 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2049538 ([RFE] Issues when using multiple CephFS filesystems from the same ceph cluster) 15:46:27 gouthamr: thank you for the report 15:46:47 some context: this RFE came from a discussion in the #openstack-manila channel 15:47:10 which was also something that was already requested by Elias Wimmer recently 15:48:41 so the CephFS driver could use some enhancements in this case, that would allow provisioning correctly shares in case we have the same filesystem being used 15:49:03 there's a fix proposed by Kris: 15:49:14 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/905986 (Update cephfs driver to return provision capacity) 15:49:45 we can review this to see if it covers short/long term scenario, but good to track all the work with this RFE 15:50:33 im having second thoughts about the RFE; I think it’s good to split this into two separate RFEs 15:51:18 we’ll have different fixes for sure; and it’s likely we’ll have different thoughts about back porting one of these 15:51:42 makes sense 15:51:57 gouthamr: do you mind splitting the two RFEs? 15:52:06 sure can; I’d vote for medium prio, m-3 15:52:25 and I can take the second RFE 15:52:51 gouthamr: sure :) 15:52:54 thank you! 15:53:41 next bug... 15:53:51 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2049632 (the creation of "share access" no longer works since migrating to OpenStack Wallaby) 15:56:15 very curious but first time I hear about this issue I think 15:56:51 "I have found that it works when using the cluster admin credentials that are defined in the manila.conf configuration file" 15:57:08 backend name mentions NFS, so I'd assume the share is NFS as well 15:57:49 would be nice to have some more logs though 15:59:10 iirc during wallaby we have done changes to security services 15:59:21 in the NetApp driver 15:59:22 we just started RHOSP 17 for Manila, which is based on wallaby .. we can cross verify this there. 15:59:28 awesome 15:59:32 thank you very much msaravan 15:59:37 can I assign the bug to you? 15:59:47 Sure 15:59:56 please feel free to ask additional questions to the reporter, i.e.: some steps, logs and so on 16:00:09 sure, will do. 16:00:15 thank you! :D 16:00:20 alright, we're at the top of the hour 16:00:40 we have another bug in the list, but it'd be a follow-up to previous week's bug, so we can check back on that later 16:01:13 I'm setting the bug in the NetApp driver to medium prio, but I'm open to discussions about it 16:01:21 thank you everyone for joining 16:01:25 have a great day 16:01:30 see you on #openstack-manila 16:01:33 #endmeeting