15:01:33 <gouthamr> #startmeeting manila
15:01:33 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan 21 15:01:33 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gouthamr. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:34 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:36 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'manila'
15:01:43 <carloss> o/
15:01:44 <dviroel> o/
15:01:52 <disap> o/
15:01:55 <kiwi_36> o/
15:01:56 <vhari> hi
15:02:01 <tbarron> hi
15:02:03 <carthaca> hi
15:02:30 <gouthamr> hey there everyone, sorry for the late start
15:02:50 <gouthamr> courtesy ping: ganso vkmc lseki andrebeltrami felipe_rodrigues esantos
15:03:06 <gouthamr> a very light agenda today:
15:03:08 <gouthamr> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting
15:03:29 <gouthamr> first off
15:03:33 <gouthamr> #topic Announcements
15:03:46 <gouthamr> we're officially at milestone-2
15:04:02 <gouthamr> #link https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html (Wallaby release schedule)
15:04:34 <gouthamr> if you had bugfixes targeted at this milestone, and they're not yet ready, please retarget them
15:05:11 <gouthamr> our new driver deadline is in two weeks, and feature proposal freeze follows right after
15:05:30 * vkmc sneaks in
15:05:32 <vkmc> o/
15:06:11 <gouthamr> \o vkmc
15:06:22 <gouthamr> no further announcements today, anyone else got any?
15:07:10 <gouthamr> alright, lets move on...
15:07:18 <gouthamr> #topic Reviews needing attention
15:07:30 <gouthamr> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-wallaby-review-focus
15:08:53 <gouthamr> i needed some reviewers for os-profiler changes
15:08:57 * gouthamr digs them up
15:09:12 <dviroel> I'll start to add some patches to this etherpad too
15:09:18 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/769729 (Integrate OSprofiler and Manila)
15:09:33 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/769731 (Add profiling support to manilaclient)
15:09:49 <gouthamr> thanks dviroel
15:09:51 <dviroel> oh
15:10:04 <dviroel> osprofiler :)
15:10:21 <gouthamr> as you come across changes, feel free to add them to the etherpad if you find they need attention
15:11:44 <gouthamr> to avoid reviewer fatigue at the end, please take time to do a few reviews
15:13:20 <gouthamr> perhaps everyday from now, so we can better assess what we can commit to by feature freeze rolls along
15:14:54 <gouthamr> any other reviews that we need to discuss?
15:16:12 <gouthamr> stable maintainers, a couple of choices to fix the failing jobs on stable/stein
15:16:29 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/771739 ([stable/stein] Adjust CI jobs)
15:17:02 <gouthamr> ^ this rationalizes what we want to test on this EM branch, by dropping some test jobs ^
15:17:25 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/770207 ([stable/stein] Update requirements and constraints)
15:17:59 <gouthamr> ^ this one fixes the lower-constraints failures by adjusting requirements - similar to what we did in the maintained branches
15:19:21 <gouthamr> i'm not a fan of #770207, this is too old a branch to tweak the requirements files the way it's needed
15:19:58 <tbarron> +1
15:22:24 <gouthamr> anything further about $topic?
15:22:29 <dviroel> ok, but we still need #770207 to have jobs passing? or we can consider just dropping the tests from #771739?
15:23:47 <gouthamr> dviroel: i've removed the lower-constraints job in #771739
15:24:22 <dviroel> gouthamr: ack
15:24:23 <gouthamr> dviroel: so we can abandon #770207 if we don't want to update requirements files
15:25:08 <dviroel> gouthamr: i'll take a look and vote on those patches then :)
15:25:18 <gouthamr> thank you...
15:25:19 <dviroel> gouthamr: got it
15:26:12 <gouthamr> am a fan of the zuul summary tab
15:26:32 <gouthamr> but it doesn't capture third party CI very well?
15:27:30 <gouthamr> got to probably note what's going on in the openstack-discuss ML thread that's ongoing
15:28:00 <gouthamr> alright, lets move on...
15:28:06 <gouthamr> #topic Bugs (vhari)
15:28:15 <gouthamr> o/ vhari, the floor is yours
15:28:28 <vhari> \o ty gouthamr
15:28:49 <vhari> no new bugs since last session .. will look at new ones from previous week we didn't get to
15:28:56 <vhari> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1910760
15:28:58 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1910760 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "Failing on configuring IPv4 on DevStack if IPv6 is enabled" [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to Victoria Martinez de la Cruz (vkmc)
15:29:30 <vkmc> o.o
15:29:56 <gouthamr> this one was fixed recently
15:30:01 <vkmc> I think I fixed that
15:30:01 <vkmc> yes
15:30:04 <gouthamr> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/769930 (Uses local variable with ipv4 gateway config)
15:30:12 <vkmc> hah sorry
15:30:17 <vkmc> it's a dup
15:30:19 <vkmc> let's close it
15:30:35 <vhari> ah  good to know!
15:31:05 <vkmc> let me mark it as duplicate and close :)
15:31:12 <vhari> vkmc++
15:31:12 <gouthamr> is it a duplicate?
15:31:20 <vkmc> gouthamr, yes... I reported it twice
15:31:29 <vkmc> but it is the same error
15:31:30 <vhari> pls note bug number for dup
15:31:42 <vkmc> done https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1910760
15:31:43 <openstack> Launchpad bug 769930 in lvm2 (Ubuntu) "duplicate for #1910760 Insufficient suitable allocatable extents, even though they do exist" [Undecided,Confirmed]
15:31:59 <vhari> next up #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1910752
15:31:59 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1910752 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "migration does not handle replication quota" [Undecided,New]
15:33:51 <dviroel> oh, doesn't look hard to fix it
15:34:11 <dviroel> what do you think carloss?
15:34:30 <gouthamr> nice find carthaca
15:34:31 <carloss> dviroel I agree with you
15:34:36 <carloss> thanks for reporting it carthaca
15:34:51 <gouthamr> medium, target to m-3?
15:35:14 <dviroel> if carthaca  isn't working on a fix,  maybe carloss can be the assigne to this one
15:35:25 <dviroel> +1: medium and m-3
15:35:28 <carthaca> I just don't want to hand out replicable shares for free :P
15:35:32 <carloss> +1: medium and m-3
15:36:04 <carthaca> No, I'm not super familiar with the quota code - I'm not working on a fix currently
15:36:29 <dviroel> carloss: can you take this one?
15:36:32 <gouthamr> cool, carloss is our quotas guy
15:36:38 <gouthamr> :D
15:36:40 <vhari> :D
15:36:56 <carthaca> carloss +1
15:36:57 <carloss> yes, I can dviroel
15:36:58 <carloss> :D
15:37:07 <vhari> carloss++
15:37:08 <dviroel> great!
15:37:20 <vhari> moving on .. #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1908838
15:37:21 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1908838 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "Manila share service image not getting downloaded properly" [Undecided,New]
15:37:25 <gouthamr> haha, thanks carloss
15:37:35 <carloss> yw ;)
15:38:29 <gouthamr> it looks like there are three bugs in this one
15:39:19 <gouthamr> i wonder if problems 1 and 2 are related
15:40:11 <tbarron> I think there's a redirect in the url
15:40:35 <tbarron> need -L in the curl command
15:41:37 * gouthamr i see, so we could update the install doc
15:41:43 <tbarron> whether the linux-bridge problems is somehow related I dunno
15:42:06 <gouthamr> and add a checksum for the image for verification download
15:42:13 <gouthamr> after*
15:42:56 <gouthamr> tbarron: i suspect it was, because the reporter mailed me a few times and we couldn't crack the issue, until he realized he couldn't bring up the VM manually as well
15:43:00 <gouthamr> and investigated the image
15:43:36 <tbarron> i just tried the curl cmd with and without -L and my guess checks out
15:44:20 * tbarron hunts for where we document that
15:44:33 <gouthamr> ty tbarron
15:45:00 <gouthamr> vkmc: can you or disap make the manila-ui fix
15:45:10 <tbarron> I'll respond on the bug when I find it, propose a patch, but ^^^
15:45:32 <tbarron> the ui issue seems independent
15:45:34 <gouthamr> vkmc: i suspect you don't need a bug for it, it's a package name update someplace in our install docs
15:46:50 <vkmc> gouthamr, of course
15:47:02 <gouthamr> thanks vkmc
15:47:05 <vkmc> I can do that
15:47:05 <vkmc> np
15:47:28 <gouthamr> so we can mark this low, m-3?
15:47:56 <vhari> +1
15:48:07 <gouthamr> although the image checksum would be nice to implement, we can wishlist that part, and just ensure curl works with redirects
15:49:05 <vhari> gouthamr, that's a wrap for bugs if no other thoughts ^^
15:49:13 <gouthamr> great, thank you vhari
15:49:22 <gouthamr> #topic Open Discussion
15:49:22 <vhari> gouthamr, yw
15:50:57 <carthaca> I'm looking for a backup solution for my manila shares :)
15:50:59 <carthaca> Are there any plans to do that directly with manila or should I look into other services like freezer?
15:51:33 <gouthamr> carthaca: we had a proposal in the past to build a generic backup solution on top of the manila-data service
15:52:15 <gouthamr> carthaca: we discussed the merits at length in a couple of design summits too iirc
15:52:48 <gouthamr> don't think we're opposed to it, but it hasn't been a priority; i dunno how well freezer is maintained though
15:57:06 <tbarron> carthaca: I think one aspect that we circled around on was whether the backup would be least common denominator so that
15:57:32 <tbarron> restores can be to a different type of back end or whether they would be backend-specific
15:57:45 <tbarron> carthaca: which is your interest?
15:58:30 <carthaca> Currently we are running Netapp only, so restore would go to the same backend
15:59:27 <carthaca> Important would be to use the smart features of the vendor, we don't want to install an dumb agent that copies all files
16:00:09 <gouthamr> we're at the hour
16:00:09 <carthaca> So for Netapp we would evaluate the ndmp interface or snapvault/snapmirror
16:00:36 <carthaca> Thanks for the feedback
16:00:48 <gouthamr> +1, we might be able to approach it in two parts
16:00:58 <gouthamr> lets take the discussion to #openstack-manila
16:01:04 <gouthamr> thanks everyone, stay safe
16:01:11 <gouthamr> #endmeeting