15:01:17 #startmeeting manila 15:01:18 Meeting started Thu Mar 6 15:01:17 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:22 The meeting name has been set to 'manila' 15:01:38 hello everyone 15:01:52 is anybody here? 15:01:54 hello 15:02:30 looks like low attendence today 15:02:39 thanks for joining vponomaryov! 15:02:59 Should we wait some time? 15:03:06 Hi - 15:03:13 yeah I don't have much of an agenda 15:03:35 the main issue for me is the NetApp driver is still stuck in review 15:03:59 but we can also run through dev status for the benefit of those who read the minutes later on 15:04:00 bswartz: I will take a look at that by end of the week 15:04:26 bill_az_: it's not that we need more reviews, we've reviewed the crap out of it 15:04:49 the problem is that there are some unresolved changes to the code that's common between the netapp cinder driver and the netapp manila driver 15:05:14 we want to achieve a long term solution to sharing that code and it's going slower than I'd hoped 15:05:16 actually, it has been updated several minutes ago 15:05:21 bswartz: ok- I'd still like to take a pass through it, and also through generic driver 15:05:21 oh 15:05:59 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59100/ 15:06:05 that's the one I'm looking at 15:06:22 I've been tied up with cinder lately, but will be shifting focus back to manila now 15:06:45 hmm it looks like yportnova did a lot of work here 15:06:59 yportnova: are you here? 15:07:16 bswartz: we still need to wait until Navneet upload new patchset to cinder 15:07:31 bswartz: I am here. hi! 15:07:41 yportnova: okay thanks -- are your changes complete regarding the syncing of the api.py file? 15:08:11 Yes, but waiting for fix to cinder 15:08:22 I don't think we should wait 15:08:32 I'll do a review of the latest patches and give my comments 15:08:42 s/patches/patchset/ 15:09:17 I've talked to a few companies that are looking to beta test manila 15:09:47 there is interest in both the generic driver and the NetApp driver, so I want them both upstream where we can get some real testing 15:10:23 and there are several other vendors who have expressed plans to have drivers ready before Atlanta 15:10:36 so I'm happy to get those merged when they're ready 15:11:07 yportnova: anything else to discuss regarding the netapp driver? 15:11:27 bswartz: Nothing 15:11:31 bill_az_: can you remind us what state the IBM driver is in? 15:12:03 or anyone else lurking who wants to talk about drivers before we go on? 15:12:22 bswartz: We have had a proof of concept version of gpfs manila driver since late last year - the goal is to get this wrapped up and submitted by end of this month 15:12:28 single tenant only 15:12:30 nfs only 15:12:39 (ganesha or kernel nfs) 15:12:41 ah okay 15:12:55 bill_az_: is there a WIP on gerrit? 15:13:31 bswartz: I think there is a very early code drop but nothing recent 15:13:38 okay 15:14:01 if you make any progress feel free to put it up as a WIP so we can take a look at it before it's done 15:14:07 #topic dev status 15:14:27 Dev status: 15:14:30 vponomaryov: do you want to give your normal update? 15:14:40 bswartz: sure, I will do that 15:14:44 1) NetApp Cmode driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59100/ 15:14:44 Changes due to review issues has been implemented. Ready for review. 15:14:55 2) Devstack with generic driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74647/ 15:15:00 Ready to review. Used processed ubuntu cloud image with nfs and cifs, that can run with 64mb RAM and without discs, its weight ~290 Mb. 15:15:18 3) Generic driver's modularity: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74154/ 15:15:18 Changes due to review issues has been implemented. Ready for review. 15:15:35 vponomaryov: where can that image be obtained? 15:15:49 link is present ingerrit commit 15:15:56 okay good 15:16:14 csaba: you here? 15:16:21 link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/vi5oeh10q1qkckh/ubuntu_1204_nfs_cifs.qcow2 15:16:27 looks like he's AFK and not in channel 15:17:11 alright, thanks vponomaryov 15:17:13 this image works, but can be improved, so can be updated after a while 15:17:59 yeah having something that works is the most important -- I'm looking forward to csaba's image as our longer-term solution 15:18:19 so it looks like some reviews are needed 15:18:46 for those that are wondering, the horizon support for manila is coming along too 15:19:14 here is a preview 15:19:18 #link https://github.com/NetApp/horizon/tree/manila 15:19:48 Also, wanted to mention TODO list 15:19:52 okay 15:19:55 TODO: 15:20:01 1) Make drivers (Generic, Cmode) use activation/deactivation API 15:20:11 2) Update tempest to use activation of share-networks 15:20:19 3) (generic driver) Change service instance connectivity directly to private subnet 15:20:28 4) Update Horizon extension for Manila due to API changes, bugfixing 15:20:36 5) Implement volume types server side 15:20:45 6) Implement quota for activation of share-networks 15:20:52 navneet: you here? 15:21:14 yeah that's a lot of work to do before the conference 15:21:43 we will see about getting help from our side to get it all done 15:22:13 okay I don't have anything else 15:22:18 #topic open discussion 15:22:31 First priority after merging of Cmode driver? 15:22:43 Assuming there's nothing else I'll give you all back 35 minutes 15:23:11 the cmode driver is top priority, then horizon 15:23:29 although your (1) and (2) TODO items looks pretty small 15:23:35 but drivers does not use activation 15:23:38 vponomaryov: how much work is (1) and (2) 15:24:12 no much work, if no blockers 15:24:39 okay let's knock those out next as long as they're quick to do 15:25:13 Horizon depends on API, so it requires stable API 15:25:14 okay grab me in #manila or PM me if you need anything, I think we're done 15:25:25 ok 15:25:37 #endmeeting