14:03:28 <irenab> #startmeeting kuryr
14:03:29 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Dec 11 14:03:28 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is irenab. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:03:30 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:03:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'kuryr'
14:03:53 <irenab> hellow, who is here for a meeting?
14:04:01 <dmellado> o/
14:04:03 <leyal> o/
14:04:04 <ltomasbo> o/
14:04:09 <irenab> #chair dmellado
14:04:10 <openstack> Current chairs: dmellado irenab
14:04:34 <dulek> o/
14:04:38 <yboaron> o/
14:04:39 <irenab> shall we wait for Toni?
14:04:45 <danil> o/
14:04:48 <dmellado> irenab: I haven't seen him around at all today
14:04:52 <ltomasbo> I think Toni is on PTO today
14:05:05 <irenab> lets start then
14:05:23 <irenab> #topic kuryr-libnetwork
14:06:03 <irenab> there is SRIOV patch to be reviewed #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/kuryr-libnetwork
14:06:38 <irenab> sorry, correct link #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500436/
14:06:56 <irenab> apuimedo, irenab to review
14:07:07 <irenab> #topic kuryr-kubernetes
14:07:13 <danil> according to approach (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513715/) I made patches (https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/kuryr-kubernetes-sriov-support-refactor+(status:open+OR+status:merged)). Feel free to review
14:07:50 <dulek> danil: I'll need to sign up for those.
14:08:22 <irenab> dulek, irenab, others please review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/kuryr-kubernetes-sriov-support-refactor+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
14:08:42 <danil> sure, thanks
14:08:45 <dmellado> irenab: now you ask yourself to review too? :P
14:08:45 <irenab> danil, anything specifc you want to discuss?
14:08:59 <irenab> dmellado, yea :-)
14:09:09 <dulek> danil: I can see that CI is failing for daemonized Cinder on the first patch.
14:09:15 <danil> nothing special. Just waiting for your comments on patches
14:09:32 <dulek> danil: I'll help you to debug it and adapt. I just need to go through the patches first.
14:09:33 <danil> dulek, hm, I'll check
14:09:50 <danil> dulek, thanks, sure
14:10:40 <irenab> danil, I do not have SRIOV NICs in my lab, so will review only the logic
14:10:53 <danil> irenab, ok, sure
14:11:00 <yboaron> danil, are we having going for a proprietary  solution for the multi VIF use case ? as far as I remember we where waiting for community solution
14:11:15 <dulek> danil: BTW - why don't your join #openstack-kuryr channel? :)
14:11:27 <dmellado> heh, true danil
14:11:28 <yboaron> I mean k8s community solution
14:11:30 <dmellado> that'd come in handy!
14:12:50 <danil> dulek, I'm there as I know. yboaron , please, give any refs for that solution. I will check
14:13:45 <irenab> I think there is no clear solution yes, mostly community discussions how to keep k8s API consistent but extendable
14:13:49 <leyal> yboaron , is this discussion is relevant - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-sig-network/9YEhLBte1Z0 ?
14:14:02 <dulek> danil: I don't see you in the roster. Kind of netsplit?
14:15:35 <irenab> leyal, do you to give a short update on the network policy support?
14:15:53 <leyal> yep
14:15:58 <danil> leyal, thanks
14:16:38 <leyal> 1. i will be happy to continue to discussion on the spec ..
14:17:25 <leyal> 2. I uploaded a WIP patch for translating  k8s policy to SG (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526916/1)
14:17:48 <dmellado> leyal: just for the record could you put a link to the spec around? ;)
14:18:22 <irenab> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519239/
14:18:25 <leyal> 3. i trying to use k8s python client for serializing the network-policy object - but there is issue with the requirement  .. (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526925/)
14:18:28 <dmellado> thanks irenab
14:18:30 <irenab> network policy support spec
14:19:15 <irenab> so once requirements are updated, this should work?
14:20:16 <leyal> yep, but currently support only ip_block peer type - still need to add the POD-selector and namespace-selector
14:21:01 <irenab> leyal, maybe you can add a context on what would be the other patches, maybe on the launchpad board
14:21:42 <leyal> irenab , will do
14:21:48 <irenab> thanks!
14:21:53 <janonymous> o/ :)
14:22:02 <irenab> janonymous, hi
14:22:34 <irenab> dulek, ltomasbo , dmellado any updates?
14:22:47 <ltomasbo> irenab, not from my side
14:22:59 <dulek> Not much from my side, I'm still exploring how to move VIF choice to daemon.
14:23:12 <dmellado> Yeah, I would love to have some reviews to gena's patch if possible, he's adding a pod to pod test and will follow up with a ports pool one
14:23:14 <dulek> I'm testing it now, hope to have some code up for reviews soon.
14:23:25 <dmellado> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/525626/
14:23:28 <irenab> dmellado, link?
14:23:33 <dulek> dmellado: It failed the gate and it's pretty difficult to debug. :(
14:23:39 <irenab> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/525626/
14:23:45 <yboaron> I’ve uploaded tests and devref to L7 routing patch . Please review :  #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523900/
14:23:48 <dmellado> dulek: I saw it, I'm trying to debug myself...
14:23:54 <dulek> dmellado: And I've run it successfully on my local env, so I'm surprised.
14:23:59 <dmellado> it did fail on mine
14:24:03 <dmellado> so we have 50-50 xD
14:24:14 <dulek> dmellado: I guess your env is right then. :)
14:24:23 <dmellado> but at least I just wanted folks to be aware of
14:24:27 <dmellado> and we could use some more debugging too
14:24:29 <irenab> please review L7 routing patch
14:24:34 <dmellado> thanks!
14:24:50 <yboaron> 10x irenab
14:26:10 <irenab> are we ready to move to bugs discussion?
14:27:03 <irenab> #topic bugs
14:27:44 <dulek> irenab: What's about bugs? :)
14:28:05 <irenab> anyone wants to discuss/raise some issue, not feature?
14:28:09 <dmellado> we don't have any! xD
14:28:10 <dmellado> lol
14:28:24 <irenab> There is one I reported, not sure it is a but, but anyway https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr-kubernetes/+bug/1736677
14:28:25 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1736677 in kuryr-kubernetes "Add native Octavia driver to support k8s services" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Irena Berezovsky (irenab)
14:29:17 <irenab> Since Octavia now has its own API endpoint, it will deprecate neutron-lbaas
14:29:21 <dmellado> irenab: I see that we do have quite a few
14:29:31 <dulek> I've reported a few, but don't have the time to work on them just now.
14:29:32 <dmellado> and I think it's a great idea to have this section
14:29:46 <dmellado> maybe we should just try to add a triage section to this meeting
14:30:02 <irenab> I am not sure how urgent is to deal with it now, but something we need to be ware of
14:30:05 <irenab> dmellado, agreed
14:30:31 <dulek> Throwing two more reports into discussion: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr-kubernetes/+bug/1734875 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr-kubernetes/+bug/1731486
14:30:32 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1734875 in kuryr-kubernetes "openshift gates fail with 403 Forbidden when downloading OpenShift binaries" [Undecided,New]
14:30:33 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1731486 in kuryr-kubernetes "Kuryr ignores namespaces" [High,Confirmed]
14:31:02 <dmellado> it ignores namespaces? oh my xD
14:31:09 <irenab> dulek, I think you were also checking upgrade of devstack to k8s 1.8
14:31:16 <dulek> First one should be a low hanging fruit for anyone that can read wget's manpage.
14:31:33 <dulek> irenab: I'm debugging it right now, for some reason it stopped working.
14:31:57 <dulek> irenab: But this is WiP patch for 1.8 support: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/525502/
14:32:42 <irenab> dulek, thanks
14:32:49 <irenab> will check this
14:33:23 <irenab> Let's sort out the priorities for the bugs till next meeting, to make sure what is critical to resolve
14:33:24 <dulek> irenab: I think it just went through on my env, so I'll submit another version later today.
14:34:29 <irenab> cool
14:35:22 <irenab> #topic open discussion
14:35:51 <irenab> Anyone wants to raise topic for discussion
14:35:55 <irenab> ?
14:36:36 <dulek> Actually…
14:36:49 <dulek> What do you think about making some of the tempest gates voting?
14:37:15 <dulek> I'd propose at least basic lbaasv2 and Octavia jobs.
14:37:23 <dulek> Maybe lbaasv2+CNI daemon as well.
14:37:48 <irenab> dulek, we can and if has issues always can brng it back to non-voting
14:37:58 <irenab> dmellado, what do you think?
14:38:46 <dmellado> I agree on lbaasv2 and octavia
14:38:56 <dmellado> as dulek said, we can always put them back to nv if needed ;)
14:39:30 <irenab> so +1 for making lbaasv2 and Octavia jobs voting
14:39:53 <dulek> dmellado, irenab: Those two are stable. I'll file a patch and link Graphana statistics so we can check for sure that the jobs are stable.
14:39:57 <irenab> +1 from me for the CNI daemon as well
14:40:08 <dmellado> dulek: awesome ;)
14:40:31 <ltomasbo> great!
14:40:33 <dulek> irenab: Okay, I'll check it's stability in longer term, but should be similar to the aforementioned ones.
14:40:40 <dulek> it's/its
14:41:03 <irenab> ok, seems we are good to have extra 15 mins to attend the other meetings ;-)
14:41:52 <irenab> thank you all for joining
14:42:00 <irenab> #endmeeting