03:01:22 <tfukushima> #startmeeting kuryr 03:01:22 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar 22 03:01:22 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tfukushima. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 03:01:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 03:01:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'kuryr' 03:01:52 <tfukushima> Who's up for Kuryr weekly meeting? 03:02:16 <fawadkhaliq> o/ 03:02:57 <tfukushima> mspreitz: Are you joining us as well? 03:03:06 <mspreitz> yes 03:03:36 <tfukushima> #info fawadkhaliq, mspreitz and tfukushima are present. 03:03:52 <tfukushima> So it seems we don't have the agenda today. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Kuryr#Meeting_March_14.2C_2016 03:04:16 <tfukushima> But we can inherit the previous one. 03:04:55 <tfukushima> We can go quick. 03:05:18 <tfukushima> #topic Kubernetes Integration 03:05:53 <tfukushima> So we had the k8s meeting as you know. 03:06:02 <mspreitz> not sure I do 03:06:05 <mspreitz> which meeting? 03:06:31 <tfukushima> mspreitz: You led the meeting actually :-) 03:06:50 <mspreitz> I suppose that narrows it down a bit 03:07:00 <mspreitz> I probably remember most of it 03:07:33 <mspreitz> I updated my devref with examples, as discussed. 03:08:01 <mspreitz> IIRC there was also a request for finer details on the implementation, but I have not had time to write that yet. 03:09:04 <mspreitz> Baohua Yang also raised an interesting point in review: the policy agent looks like it is not really specific to the translate approach, could be used for the direct approach too. 03:10:02 <mspreitz> He also carried on about linux bridges, but I think he is still misguided about that. But he is not here now. 03:10:03 <tfukushima> mspreitz: Ok, we need to take a look at it. 03:11:18 <mspreitz> That's all the news I have for now. 03:11:27 <tfukushima> #action baohua gives us more details about the linux bridge stuff and the policy agent. 03:12:05 <tfukushima> #action Everyone reviews mspreitz's spec, which introduces the CNM-CNI translation. 03:12:35 <tfukushima> #action Everyone reviews irenab's spec, which introduces the direct translation with the agent and the CNI plugin. 03:12:43 <tfukushima> mspreitz: Thanks. 03:12:47 <mspreitz> yw 03:13:10 <mspreitz> Regarding Irena's spec... 03:13:37 <mspreitz> I think it might be good to split out the part about replacing the kube-proxy 03:14:09 <mspreitz> That, and the MT part, open lots of issues. We might want to factor the spec into two or three. 03:14:40 <tfukushima> mspreitz: Sorry, what is "MT" here? 03:14:45 <mspreitz> Multi-Tenancy 03:14:49 <tfukushima> Oh, multi tenancy. 03:15:38 <tfukushima> #action irenab thinks about to split her spec into a few pieces, like kube-proxy part and multi-tenancy part. 03:16:05 <tfukushima> Yeah, kube-proxy replacement plan can be optional. 03:16:07 <mspreitz> Oh, and I remembered one other thing... 03:16:23 <mspreitz> What's up with making Neutron routers share routing information? 03:16:48 <mspreitz> I saw some stuff on the mailing list that suggests there is some work under way for that. 03:17:18 <tfukushima> mspreitz: Could you elaborate it more? 03:17:35 * mspreitz looks through email inbox... 03:18:19 <mspreitz> Subject line is "[openstack-dev] [neutron] BGP Dynamic Routing Development Going Forward" 03:18:37 <mspreitz> I haven't tried to digest it yet myself. 03:18:37 <tfukushima> #link mspreitz 's CNM-CNI spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290172/ 03:18:57 <tfukushima> #link irenab's direct translation spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281132/ 03:19:02 <mspreitz> I just wondered if anybody here has a TL;DR 03:19:44 <tfukushima> I don't unfortunately. How about you, fawadkhaliq? 03:20:25 <fawadkhaliq> tfukushima: same 03:20:44 <tfukushima> Ok. 03:22:02 <tfukushima> mspreitz: I might be wrong but I thought we could just use a Neutron router for connecting subnets under the same network, which could be translated into the namespace. 03:22:38 <mspreitz> For level 1 ambition that's fine. For level 2, introducing multi-tenancy, I suggested a router per tenant. Now we get to think about routing between tenants. 03:23:05 <tfukushima> Uh, I see. 03:23:48 <tfukushima> #action K8s guys check the thread "[openstack-dev] [neutron] BGP Dynamic Routing Development Going Forward" on ML 03:25:13 <tfukushima> So for the direct translation side, I'm working on the devref of the API watcher agent now. I'll submit it once it gets nice shape. 03:25:38 <tfukushima> #action tfukushima write the devref of the API watcher agent 03:26:20 <tfukushima> The agent idea could be used for other things such as the translation of the policy and so on, I believe. 03:27:19 <tfukushima> I hope I could finish it before "Hanami" season in Tokyo, which is the random party where you see cherry blossoms and drink sake. 03:27:36 <tfukushima> Let's move on. 03:27:48 <tfukushima> #topic Nested Containers and Magnum Integration 03:28:03 <tfukushima> fawadkhaliq: Congrats for you patch merged. 03:28:11 <tfukushima> s/you/your/ 03:28:20 <fawadkhaliq> tfukushima: thanks 03:29:02 <fawadkhaliq> so gsagie introduced oanson to me, who will be helping with the next steps 03:29:21 <tfukushima> fawadkhaliq: Good. What'd be the next step? 03:29:46 <fawadkhaliq> I am hoping to make some progress on the kuryr agent details. Need to find some time to get to that and then implementation. 03:30:23 <fawadkhaliq> there's not much other than this on this topic today 03:31:23 <tfukushima> #fawadkhaliq takes the next step to give the details of the kuryr agent and the implementation with the help from oanson 03:31:36 <tfukushima> #action fawadkhaliq takes the next step to give the details of the kuryr agent and the implementation with the help from oanson 03:31:43 <tfukushima> Ooops, excuse me. 03:31:54 <tfukushima> fawadkhaliq: Ok, thanks. 03:32:26 <tfukushima> #topic Existing Networks 03:32:43 <tfukushima> banix is not here but he's working on this already. 03:32:45 <fawadkhaliq> yw 03:33:14 <tfukushima> #link banix's patch with Neuron tag https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288737/ 03:34:21 <tfukushima> He's leveraging the newly introduced "tag" field for the Neutron resources to track the Docker IDs. 03:35:31 <tfukushima> #link banix's patch for "-o neutron.net.uuid=d98d1259-03d1-4b45-9b86-b039cba1d90d" capability https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280948/ 03:35:52 <tfukushima> #topic Fullstack and Rally integration 03:36:41 <tfukushima> It seems baohua is not here today but he's in charge of this. 03:37:06 <tfukushima> #link baohua's patches https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:baohua%2540linux.vnet.ibm.com+status:open 03:37:31 <tfukushima> fawadkhaliq: Thanks for your reviews. 03:38:05 <tfukushima> I think we can finish early today. 03:38:13 <tfukushima> #topic open discussion 03:38:42 <tfukushima> mspreitz , fawadkhaliq: Do you have anything you want to talk specifically? 03:38:53 <mspreitz> I have nothing to add now. 03:38:56 <fawadkhaliq> tfukushima: nothing from my side. 03:39:10 <tfukushima> Alright, let's wrap the meeting up. 03:39:31 <tfukushima> Thanks for joining and let's keep eyes on patches. 03:39:47 <tfukushima> #endmeeting