13:00:11 <mnasiadka> #startmeeting kolla
13:00:11 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Aug 23 13:00:11 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:00:11 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:00:11 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'kolla'
13:00:14 <mnasiadka> #topic rollcall
13:00:14 <mnasiadka> o/
13:00:44 <mmalchuk> \o
13:01:03 <bbezak> [o]
13:01:26 <SvenKieske> o/
13:01:54 <mhiner> o/
13:03:20 <frickler> \o
13:03:22 <mnasiadka> #topic agenda
13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * Review action items from the last meeting
13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * CI status
13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * Release tasks
13:03:22 <mnasiadka> * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month)
13:03:23 <mnasiadka> * Current cycle planning
13:03:23 <mnasiadka> * Additional agenda (from whiteboard)
13:03:25 <mnasiadka> * Open discussion
13:03:30 <mnasiadka> #topic Review action items from the last meeting
13:03:37 <mnasiadka> mnasiadka to send a mail to ML and drop openvswitch-netcontrold
13:03:38 <mnasiadka> done
13:03:44 <mnasiadka> #topic CI status
13:04:05 <mmalchuk> broken
13:04:10 <mnasiadka> A bit red, because we uploaded images to quay.io with bullseye tag, but they have bookworm inside - so kolla-ansible-debian jobs are broken
13:04:11 <mmalchuk> invalid configuration
13:04:37 <frickler> magnum job is still broken with designate testing. I made a bit of progress but no success yet
13:04:39 <mnasiadka> will be fixed by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/892323 and kolla-ansible side
13:04:49 <mnasiadka> will shout when I'll need reviews :)
13:05:00 <frickler> do we need to delete those wrong images?
13:05:58 <mnasiadka> Yes, have a script ready to fire off once we move :)
13:06:02 <SvenKieske> it would be nice, there could be accidental users, no?
13:06:07 <SvenKieske> ah cool :)
13:06:18 <mnasiadka> #topic Release tasks
13:06:25 <mnasiadka> did we merge the UCA patch for Bobcat?
13:06:39 <mnasiadka> yes
13:07:30 <mnasiadka> no RDO for Bobcat yet, we'll need to wait for the coordinated release
13:07:40 <mnasiadka> #topic Current cycle planning
13:08:30 <mnasiadka> So, Bookworm followups are on it's way, we built the images and deploy them on Bullseye host OS,  now the patches that use those images need to pass and we should be sort of done
13:08:39 <mnasiadka> Let's Encrypt - didn't have time to have a look
13:09:00 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/887347
13:09:07 <mnasiadka> that one should be first to get in
13:09:23 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fletsencrypt-https
13:09:51 <mnasiadka> kevko: are you going to address hrw's comments?
13:09:58 <mnasiadka> ah, kevko is not with us
13:10:11 <mnasiadka> once all comments are addressed - I guess we should go forward with this
13:10:18 <mnasiadka> Second one is podman
13:10:31 <mnasiadka> mhiner: still having problems on Rocky 9?
13:10:51 <mhiner> nope, that was solved yesterday, I think
13:11:18 <mnasiadka> nice
13:11:29 <mnasiadka> do we have a topic for all the patches we need to merge?
13:11:51 <opendevreview> Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: debian: Add bookworm support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/892323
13:13:42 <mhiner> we have topic for all podman related patches - kolla-podman
13:13:53 <SvenKieske> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:kolla-podman
13:14:00 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:kolla-podman
13:14:49 <SvenKieske> that would've been handy for bookworm too, btw :)
13:15:02 <opendevreview> Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Transition to DockerClient and docker 3.0.0+  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/825786
13:15:29 <mnasiadka> ok, so we have those two topics to prioritise reviews on
13:15:39 <mnasiadka> #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard)
13:16:02 <mnasiadka> octavia jobboard (frickler)
13:16:03 <mnasiadka> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/888588
13:16:05 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/888588
13:17:04 <mnasiadka> frickler: can we rework it a bit to enable it only when amphora is enabled? we have clouds that only run ovn-octavia-provider and would be a shame to enforce redis on them when it's not needed
13:19:52 <mnasiadka> next one is Enable RabbitMQ HA queues by default by mattcrees
13:19:58 <SvenKieske> I'd say it seems reasonable, but I can't speak for fricker :)
13:19:58 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/882825
13:20:03 <mnasiadka> needs second core
13:20:29 <mnasiadka> and SvenKieske: asking for review/feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/874769
13:20:29 <frickler> sorry, was distracted for a second, I can update the jobboard patch, yes
13:20:34 <mnasiadka> frickler: thanks
13:23:23 <mnasiadka> SvenKieske: commented, will keep an eye on this - I'm not convinced it will not fail under some circumstances - but can understand it's better than what we have today (and as long as it's not default it should be ok) - although we're not testing that in CI
13:23:27 <mnasiadka> and maybe we should
13:24:02 <SvenKieske> nice, thanks :) sure there are still cases not covered by this :)
13:24:10 <frickler> but certainly an interesting topic, I'll try to do a deeper review, too
13:25:00 <mnasiadka> there's also my tripleo-like patch with a lot of dust on it, I'll try to revive it - because that would enable us to do agent restart without really affecting data path
13:25:29 <SvenKieske> got a link for that? I'm curious
13:26:02 <mnasiadka> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/864780
13:26:23 <mnasiadka> it runs haproxy/keepalived/etc processes in separate containers
13:27:00 <SvenKieske> nice
13:27:20 <mnasiadka> ok, let's move to open discussion
13:27:21 <mnasiadka> #topic * Open discussion
13:27:26 <SvenKieske> ah that's the one I saw earlier, yeah pretty good :)
13:27:26 <mnasiadka> Anybody anything?
13:27:34 <mmalchuk> server-status for RH
13:27:38 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/891098
13:28:03 <mmalchuk> and reviews in Kayobe:
13:28:09 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/861397
13:28:13 <mmalchuk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/879554/12
13:28:19 <mnasiadka> bbezak: can you look at the server-status one? ^^ (it's RH, so it's on us)
13:28:41 <mnasiadka> bbezak: and the kayobe ones as well
13:30:14 <mmalchuk> thanks in advance
13:30:20 <mnasiadka> ok, anyway SHPC needs to take this
13:30:25 <mnasiadka> any other topics?
13:30:29 <mmalchuk> another one is a Gnocchi
13:30:46 <mmalchuk> anyone can push the author to make tags?
13:31:11 <mmalchuk> for stable branches we still unbuildable
13:31:12 <opendevreview> Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Revert "CentOS/Rocky: use CentOS Cloud SIG repo instead of Delorean"  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/890851
13:32:24 <mnasiadka> I have no idea - maybe try raising an issue in their GH repo?
13:33:11 <mmalchuk> remember someone told here about last week
13:33:25 <mnasiadka> that wasn't me, maybe kevko
13:33:36 <mmalchuk> there was a link to issue
13:33:45 <mmalchuk> need grep logs
13:34:14 <mnasiadka> mrunge: can you help regarding gnocchi?
13:35:47 <mnasiadka> well, it was worth a try - maybe he'll respond later
13:35:56 <mnasiadka> ok, I guess that's it for today
13:35:58 <mnasiadka> thanks for coming!
13:36:00 <mnasiadka> #endmeeting