14:00:01 #startmeeting kolla 14:00:02 Meeting started Wed Mar 1 14:00:01 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 14:00:04 #topic rollcall 14:00:05 o/ 14:00:19 it is Step 8/11 : RUN ln -s horizon-source/* horizon ....... 14:00:24 \o 14:00:30 o/ 14:01:40 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: Pin zun jobs to Docker 20 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/875687 14:01:52 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Pin zun jobs to Docker 20 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/875688 14:02:11 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Pin zun jobs to Docker 20 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/875688 14:02:30 #topic agenda 14:02:30 * CI status 14:02:30 * Release tasks 14:02:30 * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) 14:02:30 * Current cycle planning 14:02:31 * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) 14:02:31 * Open discussion 14:02:38 #topic CI status 14:02:43 We're fairly green I would say 14:02:49 #topic Release tasks 14:02:52 o/ 14:02:52 It's R-3 week 14:02:57 Feature freeze is next week 14:03:14 Kolla's FFE policy is if two cores agree to review a patch before release - FFE is granted. 14:03:28 I think we should focus on those Podman patches and Let's Encrypt 14:03:37 (if possible to get in) 14:03:46 #topic Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) 14:04:07 bbezak: want to push them again? I think frickler is absent. 14:04:39 they just been release a week ago?, maybe skip this month? 14:04:45 ah, right 14:04:50 then let's skip it, doesn't make any sense 14:04:57 #topic Current cycle planning 14:05:18 There are some things on additional agenda which should be in this topic 14:05:20 status of refactor of docker_worker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/863414/13 14:05:27 i_halomi 14:06:05 Needs reviews as I see it 14:06:25 kevko: are you willing to look into this? 14:06:26 there werent many changes from last review 14:06:35 and you already reviewed it 14:07:02 yeah, but still didn't have a time to test in real env ..just reviewed by eyes ..but it looks fine 14:07:55 hmm, let's merge 14:08:06 I tested it at some point in time, I think that it shouldn't bring any issues. 14:08:39 +2 and +w -> done 14:08:40 i_halomi: it's merging 14:08:50 the second topic from i_halomi is failed tests on unknown manifest in podman change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/799229/50 14:09:32 there are tests failing on uknown manifest which means they cant find the image 14:09:56 but we didnt change anything about docker in that patchset and its not testing podman yet 14:10:06 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/799229/50/ansible/group_vars/all.yml#594 14:10:07 L594 14:10:10 drop this change 14:10:34 and if that doesn't help - I'll have a look tomorrow 14:11:02 no need to mangle with openstack_tag 14:11:11 that should be it, I have pushed it on accident 14:11:38 great 14:11:46 btw what about this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/865182 14:11:56 it adds support for podman in Zuul 14:12:11 it's in merge conflict - that's for starters 14:12:15 does it make sense to merge before podman? 14:13:07 probably yes - so we can test it in the podman change? 14:13:26 it would be good, if we could get all podman related changes in one topic - e.g. kolla_podman 14:13:44 i will rebase it today 14:13:54 how can i set topic to change? 14:13:55 so it's easier to see what is missing 14:14:18 click show all and then edit icon beside topic 14:14:47 i_halomi: or give a name to your change and that name will be topic when you will run git review 14:14:55 to your branch 14:15:03 okay, i will also do that 14:15:40 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: docker: Set ulimit nofile on EL9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/875489 14:16:19 another question: should migration scenario be included in podman patch or can it be introduced afterwards? 14:17:35 it can be introduced afterwards 14:18:17 ok then, it's been productive this time ;) 14:18:22 #topic Open discussion 14:18:25 Any other topics? 14:18:32 yoga unbuildable ? :) 14:19:29 kevko: yes, horizon is failing 14:19:35 so somebody tell me why CI is not failing 14:20:06 mnasiadka: yeah, as I said ...CI ? mystery for me 14:20:18 hmm, maybe wheel is to blame? 14:21:33 kevko: can you run "check experimental" in your backport patch? 14:21:46 there's an experimental job that doesn't use infra wheel 14:22:00 don't know .. but i will be very grateful if we can agree on some solution how to fix ..because i need to build images for customer ...and want to build with patch which will be in upstream 14:22:04 maybe that's the culprit 14:22:49 mnasiadka: i will try 14:22:59 I see the patch needs rebasing anyway 14:23:14 another thing -> i've proposed patch for coordination url -> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/874729 ..there is -1 for TLS handling ... 14:23:21 but I confirm local build is not working :) 14:23:31 but that means we have it wrong on more places (cinder ? designate ? ) 14:23:41 mnasiadka: yes it's not :( 14:23:57 I think I saw a patch setting what Matt wrote in the comment 14:24:39 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/875321 14:25:56 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: etcd: Set the proper peer and client protocol when tls is enabled https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/875320 14:26:20 (updated commit message on this one to trigger LP automated update) 14:32:17 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Pin zun jobs to Docker 20 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/875688 14:32:59 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: Pin zun jobs to Docker 20 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/875687 14:41:15 mnasiadka: why it is pinned only for centos and rocky 14:42:46 which one? docker for zun? 14:45:26 Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla stable/yoga: Pin setuptools=67.2.* https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/873913 14:46:55 Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kayobe stable/yoga: Move to Rocky Linux 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/874738 14:47:56 Merged openstack/ansible-collection-kolla stable/zed: Add support for pinning docker package https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/875684 14:48:25 mnasiadka: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/873913 14:50:29 kevko: well, I think it started to be a problem only for centos 9 stream and rocky (since newer python not listed in u-c), but it seems Debian is in the same boat 14:51:09 and centos8 jobs will fail now - because https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/707da594d13b7f1ed47800660aaa2a8a804689df/upper-constraints.txt#L643 14:55:24 Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla stable/yoga: Add support for pinning docker package https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/875685 14:56:32 mnasiadka: hmm 14:57:59 ok, I think we can close the meeting ;) 14:58:04 Thanks for coming! 14:58:06 #endmeeting