16:30:42 #startmeeting kolla 16:30:43 Meeting started Wed Sep 30 16:30:42 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sdake. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:30:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:30:45 first 16:30:46 The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' 16:30:52 #topic rollcall 16:30:52 hello 16:30:57 o/ 16:31:02 o/ 16:31:06 hi 16:31:24 good evening 16:32:31 o/ 16:32:33 hey 16:32:42 #topic announcements 16:32:58 1. liberty-rc1 was released on Tuesday the 29th 16:33:14 2. libertuy-rc2 is scheduled for the 2nd 16:33:58 3. inc0 is up for core reviewer nomination 16:34:09 \o/ 16:34:11 please vote on inc0's proposed core reviweer 16:34:35 any announcements from others? 16:34:42 yes 16:34:55 we have had a successful deploy of liberty-rc1 fro mdocker hub WITH ceph 16:35:02 not by me 16:35:07 external party :) 16:35:18 nice 16:35:24 cool 16:35:26 surprised they were able to figure it out without ceph docs :) 16:35:33 i was the ceph docs! 16:35:36 its just one command 16:35:58 #topic rc1 release announcement 16:36:13 ok I'd like to write our release announcement for rc1 for the next 7-10 minutes 16:37:04 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-liberty-rc1-announcement 16:37:18 please open that up and lets get cracking on writing the announcement, I will send after the meeting 16:43:19 does an rc release announcement only include items from the immediate last release or all of liberty up to that point? 16:43:42 jpeeler, our liberty release notes will be short 16:43:46 "we made kolla." 16:45:20 SamYaple, don't think we can add in tgt back in? 16:45:34 could just use the patch I had originally 16:45:40 then refine it in M 16:47:55 jpeeler, rhallisey as for ironic I really want to have tripleo undercloud kolla-based 16:48:25 inc0, overcloud is in the making 16:48:26 akwasnie created ansible script to deploy vm, install os, and download/deploy aio kolla there 16:48:27 rhallisey: yea well add it back in in rc3 at the latest 16:48:32 agreed 16:48:33 i have it working but its unstable 16:48:42 SamYaple, kk 16:48:53 plus there is a bigger issue with it that is to much to discuss now 16:49:03 but i need to make sure doesnt exist (data corruption) 16:49:06 we need to solve ironic and networking there and that should do 16:49:25 inc0: there's a blueprint for using standalone heat to accomplish that, but a lot has changed in kolla since the ide of doing that 16:49:51 we need heat, ironic, neutron, keystone, glance and nova leasy 16:49:53 least 16:50:08 ok we ar ewrapped I htink with that 16:50:43 anyway, that's good topic to talk about over sushi in tokyo 16:50:45 #topic rc2 bug squashing 16:51:34 #link https://launchpad.net/kolla/+milestone/liberty-rc2 16:51:50 Ok I'd like eveyrone in the channel to pick one additional bug that is not currently assigned 16:52:08 we need to be fixing 1 bug a day to have a hope of releasing Kolla bug free by the end of the dev cycle 16:52:10 which is 2 weeks 16:52:21 we have releases on the 2nd and 9th 16:52:25 these are hard deadlines 16:52:46 the process is submit to master, then once it merges, please use a cherrypick -x operation to backport to stable/liberty 16:53:04 please do not merge features into stable/liberty 16:53:13 there are two features we are merging into stable/liberty 16:53:17 these are the start.sh refactor 16:53:32 and the openstack-base refactor for centos 16:53:40 if we dont backport that backports become really really hard 16:53:43 if there are other features that peoople want in the rcs, lets get them on the table now for discussion 16:54:02 oh nvm 16:54:04 samyaple i dont comprehend what you just said :) 16:54:06 i read that wrong 16:54:11 i thought you said no to those merging 16:54:15 you said only those 16:54:21 right 16:54:23 i am open to others 16:54:24 yes agreement 16:54:27 but i dont think there are othres to be had 16:54:43 typically these are what ar ecalled "FFES" 16:54:48 or "feature freeze exceptions" 16:55:04 by the end of the M cycle i'd like to hand off release cycle management to the openstack release team 16:55:14 which means we will need FFEs for everything after x-3 16:55:34 and the release management team doessn't like ffes in general 16:55:56 so I am not keen to push us too fast into this process, but for Mitaka I'd like to start using the FFE process more reguarlly 16:56:02 sorry above "by endo f the N cycle" 16:56:09 any quesitons ? 16:56:10 i think thats doable give the maturing of this 16:56:16 agreed 16:56:34 that will help our adoption 16:56:34 but slow our feature velocity 16:56:42 i feel like we wont have too horibly many more *touch-all-files* patches 16:56:58 SamYaple, agreed 16:57:04 yup I htink we are nearly done with those 16:57:30 I think that's ok once we have functional gating 16:57:37 ok any final q/a related to the releae process and rc2/rc3? 16:58:15 I just want ot say I am so proud of our community and the amount of sheer output our team has 16:58:34 this is the third openstack project i've led into the integration of OpenStack and this team is rockin! 16:58:45 we have a really high output team, lets keep it up:0 16:58:47 ;) I mean 16:58:56 #topic open discussion 16:59:02 ya great job. Very exciting work 16:59:20 i actually have a potential, change all files patch. i'll put it up and see what people think about it 16:59:26 sdake, thanks for leading us :) 16:59:38 rhallisey you guys lead me, you just dont know it :) 16:59:42 jpeeler what does it involve? 16:59:46 I mean what is its value 17:00:00 yea jpeeler im curious what is it? 17:00:02 variable renames - value is not much, but if now is the time to get it in 17:00:04 for liberty those pathces are not goin toh appen :) 17:00:13 jpeeler: what variables? 17:00:29 with my start.sh refactor there is really only 1 place to change things 17:00:50 all.yml 17:00:58 ohh ansible variables 17:01:09 i wonder if gerrit will allow me to upload a horribly out of date patch, probably not 17:01:10 yea that might be cool. we need some changes for clarity 17:01:28 jpeeler it will 17:01:35 plus thats not container rebuild affectnig so that is backport potenial i think 17:01:39 SamYaple: essentially grouping (not sure what ansible terminology that is) 17:01:41 because its not api 17:01:55 ya i dont mind I just dont want ot break things prior to release 17:02:03 agreed 17:02:05 lets get a patch up 17:02:08 today if possible 17:02:11 even if its notperfect 17:02:16 so we understand hwat the suggested change is 17:02:24 SamYaple: you be around in a few? 17:02:35 for the record, gerrit forces rebases. so i gotta do that first 17:02:35 jpeeler: yea 17:02:48 jpeeler oh wasn't aware of that 17:02:50 bummer :( 17:02:55 i'd kind of like to finish lunch and then i'll get the one file change up 17:03:12 and if we decide it's worth doing, it'll change everywhere else 17:04:51 ok anyone have anything else they would like to discuss? 17:05:17 ubuntu-source images are pushed to docker hub 17:05:24 for liberty-rc1 17:05:36 sam can you push cnetos as well? 17:05:45 without testing is fine 17:05:45 ill be pushing centos (untested) source and binary tomorrow morning hopefully 17:05:56 cool thanks ! 17:06:12 the ubuntu images are 648MB in total 17:06:17 for full download 17:06:27 thanks to the compression from the docker hub 17:06:34 how do you determine the size of that? 17:06:44 host local registry, du -sh 17:07:46 sounds good 17:07:50 fantastic work everyone! 17:07:54 agreed 17:07:57 way to go team 17:08:04 please take a few moments to vote on inc0's core proposal 17:08:09 if you havne't already 17:08:17 harmw_ ^^ when you are around 17:08:21 anything else folks would like to discuss or shall we call it a day? 17:09:04 sounds good then :) 17:09:05 yoo 17:09:05 see ya in channel :) 17:09:08 #endmeeting