15:00:00 #startmeeting keystone 15:00:00 Meeting started Tue Dec 13 15:00:00 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is d34dh0r53. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'keystone' 15:00:06 #topic roll call 15:00:14 admiyo, bbobrov, crisloma, d34dh0r53, dpar, dstanek, hrybacki, knikolla, lbragstad, lwanderley, kmalloc, rodrigods, samueldmq, ruan_he, wxy, sonuk, vishakha, Ajay, rafaelwe, xek, gmann, zaitcev 15:02:52 #topic review past meeting work items 15:03:09 #link https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/keystone/2022/keystone.2022-12-06-15.00.html 15:03:22 o/ 15:03:25 we didn't really have a reviewathon so I'm going to push those items to next week 15:03:28 o/ gmann 15:03:46 err, this week 15:03:52 #action reviewathon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/838104 15:03:58 o/ 15:04:10 #action reviewathon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/838108 15:04:13 o/ hiromu 15:04:26 #action reviewathon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/860928 15:04:42 #action reviewathon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/860923 15:05:42 I still haven't had a chance to look at the user-defined attribute control, but things are starting to slow down for the end of the year so I should be able to look into that 15:05:51 there is service role implementation also up https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/863420 15:06:04 #action d34dh0r53 look into user-defined attribute access control 15:07:33 gmann: ack, thanks, I'll add it to the list to look at this week 15:07:42 #action reviewathon https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/863420 15:08:15 and a couple of house cleaning reviews for knikolla[m] :) 15:08:31 #action knikolla[m] please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/pycadf/+/863702 15:08:44 #action knikolla[m] please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystonemiddleware/+/866805 15:09:14 I think that does it for the past meeting work items 15:09:26 #topic liaison updates 15:09:37 nothing from VMT 15:10:12 and I don't think we have anything from release management 15:10:33 #help Please let me know if you're interested in volunteering for a liaison role 15:10:58 #topic specification OAuth 2.0 (hiromu) 15:11:06 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Foauth2-client-credentials-ext 15:11:18 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone-specs/+/843765 15:11:36 i've just updated the spec according to knikolla's comment 15:11:45 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone-specs/+/843765 15:12:01 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone-specs/+/843765/17..18 . this might be better. 15:12:17 hiromu: I saw that, thank you! 15:12:25 :) 15:12:45 i'd like to quickly check it again at the reviewathon this week 15:13:17 also, move forward to the review of codes: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/860613, if possible. 15:13:28 hiromu: ok, I'll make sure we hold one and try to ensure that knikolla[m] and xek are there 15:13:51 great. thanks. 15:14:14 no problem, thank you 15:14:52 #topic specification Secure RBAC (dmendiza[m]) 15:15:00 #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/consistent-and-secure-rbac.html#z-release-timeline_ 15:15:10 The Service Role Spec was merged, yay! 15:16:22 now on to reviewing the implementation code 15:17:01 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/863420 15:17:19 also, we need more reviews on the Manager Role Implementation 15:17:27 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/822601 15:18:48 anything I missed for Secure RBAC? 15:19:04 I think that is all 15:20:23 ack, thanks gmann! 15:20:33 moving on to open discussion 15:20:39 #topic open discussion 15:21:34 drencrom: zuul failing because test-requirements not compatible with python 3.10 (see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystonemiddleware/+/860481) 15:21:36 Is Dave our PTL still? 15:21:45 zaitcev: yes, I'm the PTL 15:25:10 zaitcev: can I help with something? 15:25:57 d34dh0r53: Did you see my e-mail on Thursday? Maybe it went to wrong Dave. 15:26:35 zaitcev: what was the subject, I was heads down last week and may have missed it 15:26:59 d34dh0r53: "Keystone work" 15:29:42 zaitcev: ahh, just found it, you sent it to the correct Dave, the correct Dave didn't reply, my bad 15:30:30 d34dh0r53: np 15:31:02 zaitcev: are you available on Friday from 9-10 Central (15:00-16:00 UTC)? 15:31:40 d34dh0r53: yes 15:31:40 that is when we have our reviewathons, I'll forward you the invite and it will give you a good idea of what we're prioritizing in terms of reviews/issues 15:31:58 awesome! 15:32:12 back to the meeting 15:32:25 oh, I tried to make it, but I was unable to find out where review-a-thon was held. 15:32:35 drencrom: zuul failing because test-requirements not compatible with python 3.10 (see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystonemiddleware/+/860481) 15:32:57 this needs one of the housekeeping reviews to merge: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystonemiddleware/+/866805 15:33:10 hopefully knikolla[m] can give that one the go ahead 15:33:24 anything else before we move to bug review? 15:33:53 #topic bug review 15:34:02 first up #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/?orderby=-id&start=0 15:36:29 I just replied to https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1999294 asking for more information 15:37:22 another new one, https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1999068 15:38:13 that's interesting, we'll need to dig into that one 15:38:59 that's the new bugs for Keystone 15:39:14 next up we have 15:39:16 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/?orderby=-id&start=0 15:39:36 nothing new for python-keystoneclient 15:39:53 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystoneauth/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0 15:40:11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystoneauth/+bug/1999431 is new 15:40:37 Hooold on. Is this not the time when you make someone volunteer for every specific bug and see it through? Or how it's done in Keystone? The one you answered and asked for logs is fine, but the other is set to fall through cracks. 15:41:15 zaitcev: well, we're running a bit short on volunteers these days :) 15:41:53 ok, sorry. How about this, I'll try to reproduce 1999068 15:42:02 I'm planning on using some of my EOY time to try to triage and wrangle our bug backlogs 15:42:07 zaitcev: that would be awesome! 15:43:06 https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystoneauth/+bug/1999431 is low-hanging-fruit, any volunteers on that one? 15:44:54 let me know, or I'll take it 15:45:38 that does it for keystoneauth 15:46:04 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystonemiddleware/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0 15:46:22 nothing new for keystonemiddleware 15:46:33 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/pycadf/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0 15:46:50 pycadf has nothing new 15:47:05 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ldappool/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0 15:47:15 neither does ldappool 15:47:56 that does it for bug review, thanks for taking the reproducer on the app-cred bug zaitcev 15:48:08 #topic conclusion 15:48:16 anything else before we go? 15:49:06 thanks everyone! see y'all at the reviewathon 15:49:09 #endmeeting