18:07:05 #startmeeting keystone 18:07:06 Meeting started Tue Aug 28 18:07:05 2012 UTC. The chair is heckj. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:07:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:07:08 The meeting name has been set to 'keystone' 18:07:12 Okay - new options :-) 18:07:26 ola y'all 18:07:30 o/ 18:07:33 #topic hot issues 18:07:56 We have a CVE that we're doing some review work on - dolph, you've got the patches 18:08:12 dolphm: anything of note there other than the review process? 18:08:27 nope, i wasn't quite aware of it either 18:09:14 Any other burning issues? 18:09:19 i done broke gerrit 18:09:23 heh 18:09:57 i'm not sure how to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/12058/ into a well-understood state 18:10:34 dolphm: is this the first cut into the feature patch? 18:10:43 er, feature branch? 18:10:49 heckj: yes, technically 18:11:06 i haven't another small patch i wanted to go in first, but i'm struggling with details 18:11:20 that will go into folsom? 18:11:25 gyee: no 18:11:31 gyee: no - this is spcifically a feature branch 18:11:50 cool, lots of code to comb through :) 18:12:07 gyee: intended to be a branch that we can work and merge into external to the release process 18:12:20 then later we merge into mainline for a release 18:12:30 heckj: gyee: there's corresponding keystoneclient changes i don't have a feature branch to push to as well 18:12:48 I'll finishup domains based on that branch then 18:13:06 dolphm: I saw the request go out - if we don't hear back from ttx on it, I'll poke him today 18:13:17 gyee: hack away :) 18:13:53 heckj: when we're ready for this to merge to master (... thinking ahead here) ... will we have a chance to see the entire feature branch as a single gerrit review before it merges? 18:14:18 heckj: i'm thinking about how we should handle code reviews between now and then 18:14:27 dolphm: that's my understanding of this process so far - that the merge to master will be a monster rebase and single commit 18:15:20 i.e. i wouldn't consider the above review master-merge-worthy as-is (falls short on test coverage, documentation, migrations, etc) 18:17:43 dolphm: I think we're doing reviews to merge into the feature branch - we can relax the tests and tools around it to allow us to "break things" while we're doing this development 18:18:08 then at some point down the road, we will choose to merge it back in and do that in close conjunction with the CI team 18:18:10 heckj: i'd rather continue to run tests + pep8 etc, personally 18:18:16 dolphm: word 18:18:37 #action heckj to pester ttx for a feature branch on keystoneclient for V3 work 18:18:55 heckj: mostly because this work should *not* affect things like devstack (which depends on v2), so those tests should continue to pass 18:19:05 * heckj nods 18:19:17 good way to make sure it doesn't - I agree 18:19:48 #topic open discussion 18:19:59 Any open discussion? 18:20:06 Did David Chadwick make it here today? 18:21:02 he's in the UK, no? 18:21:12 yeah, but said he'd be trying to connect 18:21:23 guess he's not making it as yet 18:21:46 I think last week he connected to a different IRC system (not freenode) 18:22:03 ah, that's right 18:23:51 gyee: you have anything 18:23:52 ? 18:24:58 heckj, no, I took a couple of weeks off, slowly getting back to the flow of things :) 18:27:28 If folks don't have anything else, I'll end this early today 18:27:49 sounds good 18:27:51 #endmeeting