16:00:30 #startmeeting ironic_bfv 16:00:31 Meeting started Thu Oct 12 16:00:30 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is TheJulia. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:35 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_bfv' 16:00:38 Good morning everyone! 16:00:52 o/ 16:00:53 Whose here for the second most ironic meeting, about booting baremetal from volumes? 16:02:36 Hmmmmm 16:02:49 I'm afraid if it is just hshiina and I, that we really don't have a quorum today 16:03:08 Anyway, Quick status update works 16:03:27 Our Agenda is on the Wiki, as always 16:03:29 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-BFV#Agenda 16:03:32 #topic Current Status 16:04:20 #info mjturek has posted a DIB element for the software iscsi initiator boot support for Ubuntu/Debian. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511494 16:04:58 excellent! i will review. 16:05:12 #info The iLO team has revised their implementation specficiation, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207337/ 16:05:29 I've not had a chance to review their updated spec, but it would be good to review in the next week. 16:06:47 I'm also going to review the spec. 16:06:54 #info Continued FCoE uncertainty - We may need to end up working with cinder folks to do a fast implementation based on the iscsi volume driver, but we're awaiting a little more visibility from their end to see if someone is truly already working on it before starting down that path. 16:07:31 #info Associate ports and portgroups with volume connectors is up for review in nova - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468353 16:08:24 hshiina: with regards to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468353 was there ever any discussion regarding changing the virt/driver.py interfaces? I know that was a point of discomfort/tension with the nova folks, and I honestly didn't remember to bring it up with them at the PTG. 16:09:22 I didn't bring it up at the PTG. 16:09:28 o/ sorry :) 16:09:47 o/ mjturek 16:10:06 When i got the BP approved at the last nova meeting, they told: not too bad. 16:10:33 regarding driver interfaces 16:11:07 Okay, I think it was largely sdague's concern, but I remember he more-so was hoping for discussion. Given the separate bp approval, I think we're likely good then. 16:11:25 mjturek: already mentioned the dib element, thanks! 16:11:36 mjturek, thanks! 16:11:41 awesome! I haven't tested it yet, but I think it'll work 16:11:47 heh, okay 16:11:58 wanted to push something though lol 16:12:07 Understood 16:12:24 Do we have anything else status-y that we need to discuss 16:13:31 i have nothing 16:14:12 nothing on my end 16:15:47 Okay 16:16:05 I don't have anything for us to discuss planning/priorities wise right now 16:16:08 To open discussion? 16:16:15 sure! 16:16:41 #topic Open Discussion 16:16:48 Do we have anything to discuss in open discussion today? 16:17:34 nothing today 16:17:51 I still haven't talked to our lab folks about test hardware for FCoE, will do that though. 16:18:12 I'll get some kinda status about that for next week's meeting 16:19:40 or FC I guess :) 16:19:43 Okay, thanks mjturek 16:19:47 right :) 16:19:51 np! 16:21:47 I really have nothing else, so I guess we can call it a day 16:21:50 Thanks everyone! 16:21:55 actually 16:22:06 thanks! 16:22:26 mjturek: Let me know what the lab people come back and say, I think implementing hardware HBA support logic wouldn't be hard at all 16:22:36 so if it is all hardware HBAs, then eas() 16:22:38 easy() 16:22:55 nice, will see, they often have stuff floating around 16:24:42 okay, well, thanks everyone! 16:24:49 #endmeeting