16:00:33 <mjturek> #startmeeting ironic_bfv
16:00:33 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jun  1 16:00:33 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mjturek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:34 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ironic_bfv'
16:00:44 <hshiina> o/
16:00:51 <mjturek> Hey everyone, welcome to the Ironic-BFV weekly meeting
16:01:11 <mjturek> As always our agenda is here
16:01:14 <derekh> o/
16:01:14 <mjturek> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic-BFV
16:01:51 <mjturek> #topic Announcements/Reminders
16:02:13 <mjturek> So it looks like our agenda this week hasn't been updated. Sorry about that
16:02:19 <dtantsur> just wanted to ask :)
16:02:29 <mjturek> :)
16:02:47 <mjturek> Does anyone have anything they'd like to announce?
16:03:05 <dtantsur> well, we're approaching Pike-2
16:03:21 <dtantsur> which does not affect us directly, but is a sign that we should speed up :)
16:03:46 <mjturek> agreed, we do have a patch on the nova side that we might need to focus on
16:04:06 <dtantsur> yep
16:04:19 <dtantsur> and it's blocked on ironicclient change, which is blocked on API
16:04:28 <mjturek> oh right
16:05:09 <mjturek> alright, let's move on to planning. Any objections?
16:05:20 <dtantsur> not from me
16:05:42 <mjturek> #topic Planning/Priorities
16:06:10 <mjturek> Looks like we still need to push on the next two patches in the chain. Not sure we need to adjust
16:06:28 <mjturek> personally I'm going to try to focus more on reviews
16:06:50 <mjturek> does anyone have any input here?
16:07:37 <mjturek> also, I'm still looking into moving out the storage operations. Read through vdrok's spec which is pretty straight forward, but still need to talk to him
16:07:56 <mjturek> *moving the storage operations out of the driver level to the conductor that is
16:08:13 <dtantsur> yeah
16:08:17 <derekh> Thats to address the comments in the first patch?
16:08:41 <mjturek> derekh: correct though there might be some other operations further down the chain I need to check
16:08:51 <derekh> ok
16:09:13 <mjturek> TheJulia's patch to skip deployment comes to mind
16:09:52 <hshiina> i added the patch to the chain
16:09:58 <hshiina> it got non-wip
16:10:22 <mjturek> hshiina: looking
16:10:33 <derekh> is there any piece of work that needs doing that isn't already being worked on? /me has a better handle on how everything is glued together now
16:11:11 <mjturek> derekh: Tempest tests have fallen to the backburner if you'd like to take a look there
16:11:36 <derekh> mjturek: can do,
16:11:39 <mjturek> cool
16:11:46 <mjturek> #info derekh to look into tempest tests
16:11:55 <hshiina> i posted a few patches for devstack
16:11:56 <mjturek> thanks!!
16:12:10 <mjturek> hshiina: I'm not finding the other patch you mentioned, can you link?
16:12:30 <derekh> hshiina: I've tried out the devstack stuff and successfully booted from volumes
16:12:46 <hshiina> mjturek, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466333/
16:12:50 <dtantsur> w00t
16:13:02 <derekh> I also stumbled accross the workaround patch, might be worth mentioning it in the etherpad
16:13:03 <mjturek> derekh: that's awesome!
16:13:47 <mjturek> hshiina: I was actually trying this out the other day but didn't get it to stack properly.
16:13:55 <derekh> this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441944/
16:14:35 <mjturek> maybe we should continue this in discussion
16:14:43 <mjturek> any objections for moving on to that?
16:15:16 <mjturek> cool
16:15:21 <mjturek> #topic Discussion
16:15:51 <mjturek> derekh: hshiina: have you tried stacking with the devstack patches recently?
16:16:15 <mjturek> wondering if we need to rebase of if it's something on my end
16:17:06 <derekh> mjturek: my working devtest is from yesterday I think
16:17:17 <mjturek> hmm what distro derekh?
16:17:45 <derekh> mjturek: fedora
16:17:53 <mjturek> ahhh okay, I'll give that a shot
16:17:57 <derekh> F25
16:18:02 <mjturek> thx
16:18:17 <mjturek> hshiina: Thanks for the devstack patch, it looks great!
16:18:33 <hshiina> mjturek, you're welcome
16:19:32 <hshiina> my colleagues also started working for tempest
16:19:40 <hshiina> they will give some output
16:20:01 <mjturek> hshiina: do you have their nick on hand so derekh can reach out to them?
16:20:29 <tiendc> Hi that is me
16:20:31 <hshiina> mjturek: phuongnh and tiendc
16:20:45 <mjturek> cool hi phuongnh and tiendc
16:21:07 <derekh> tiendc: hi, if there is anything you want me to help out on please ask (or test or however I can help)
16:21:22 <mjturek> #info phuongnh and tiendc are looking into tempest tests as well.
16:21:24 <tiendc> Thanks. Sure.
16:22:01 <mjturek> hshiina: I was wondering if you could elaborate on your comment here
16:22:05 <mjturek> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454243/
16:22:22 <mjturek> specifically Line 394
16:23:04 <mjturek> when does this happen in a normal deployment?
16:23:24 <mjturek> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454243/3/ironic/drivers/modules/agent.py@394
16:24:01 <hshiina> usually pxe is set up in boot.prepare_ramdisk and boot.prepare_instance
16:24:14 <phuongnh> yes, sure
16:24:18 <mjturek> ahhh understood
16:24:28 <mjturek> which we obviously skip in BFV
16:25:27 <mjturek> actually.. nvm I'm not sure of that
16:26:58 <mjturek> anyway - thanks for shedding some light there
16:27:03 <mjturek> does anyone else have anything?
16:27:39 <mjturek> alright moving on!
16:27:46 <mjturek> #topic Open Discussion
16:28:00 <mjturek> anything else people would like to discuss?
16:28:31 <mjturek> I'
16:28:44 <mjturek> ll give it 2 minutes
16:28:51 <mjturek> otherwise we can end early
16:29:43 <tiendc> Hi I want to ask about CI gate. Do we need to add a new CI gate for bfv?
16:29:55 <mjturek> that's a good question
16:30:05 <dtantsur> if you mean a CI job, yes
16:30:07 <tiendc> I am learning about that
16:30:31 <mjturek> #info tempest tests will require seperate CI job
16:31:01 <dtantsur> What is not tested cannot be considered working :)
16:31:01 <tiendc> Ah, thanks
16:32:15 <mjturek> alright do we have anything else to discuss?
16:32:32 <derekh> tiendc: I've done this before, I'f you want I'll propose one tomorrow
16:33:12 <tiendc> Thanks derekh
16:33:35 <mjturek> #info derekh to propose CI job
16:33:36 <tiendc> Yes please do
16:33:51 <derekh> tiendc: ok, I'll let you know when its up and you can see if its what your expecting
16:33:54 <dtantsur> I can help with project-config, if needed. I spent quite some time there..
16:34:17 <mjturek> :)
16:35:27 <derekh> dtantsur: I'll take a first stab at something and point you at it
16:37:13 <mjturek> alright so conversation seems to be slowing down
16:37:31 <dtantsur> cool
16:37:46 <mjturek> so thanks for joining everyone! ttyl
16:37:52 <dtantsur> thank you
16:37:54 <derekh> ty
16:37:58 <hshiina> thanks
16:37:59 <mjturek> #endmeeting