15:00:00 #startmeeting ironic 15:00:00 Meeting started Mon May 2 15:00:00 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is iurygregory. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 15:00:12 Hello ironicers o/ welcome to our weekly meeting! 15:00:16 o/ 15:00:21 o/ 15:00:23 o/ 15:00:37 o/ 15:00:41 Verification of a change to openstack/metalsmith stable/xena failed: Add a workaround to fix the CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/metalsmith/+/839925 15:00:52 o/ 15:01:12 o/ 15:01:21 o/ 15:01:24 ok, let's get started \o/ 15:01:39 you can find our agenda in the wiki 15:01:41 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_next_meeting 15:01:54 #topic Announcements / Reminder 15:02:07 #info Victoria is in EM 15:02:23 #info Creating 1st bugfix branches for Zed this week 15:02:48 #info Drop Lower Constraints Maintenance 15:02:56 #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20220414-drop-lower-constraints.html 15:03:24 o/ 15:03:25 Based on a TC resolution we will be dropping the l-c jobs 15:03:35 o/ 15:03:46 * iurygregory is wondering if this is the final drop =P 15:04:05 I'm adding the patches to our prio list =) 15:04:30 #info [all][tc] Change OpenStack release naming policy proposal 15:04:38 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028354.html 15:04:53 For those who might be interested on it =) 15:05:24 interesting 15:05:29 we're almost like going back in time 15:05:38 yeah, I also have this feeling 15:06:45 #info 5 weeks for the Open Infrastructure Summit 15:07:24 \o/ 15:07:55 does anyone have anything else to add for announcements/reminder? 15:08:17 Nothing from me 15:08:58 ok, moving on o/ 15:09:01 #topic Review action items from previous meeting 15:09:29 there was one action item from last meeting (for me) "iury to check if we have releases in victoria before moving to em" 15:10:00 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/839524 done and we already have victoria in EM 15:10:36 #topic Review subteam status reports 15:10:38 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard 15:10:44 Starting around L65 15:11:03 I've added the main topics from the Zed PTG that I know we have folks already working on 15:11:22 or topics I know we will cover already 15:12:15 iurygregory: sorry, I may have forgotten. Do we want to update our docs wrt zed priorities? 15:12:41 The priorities doc got drowned - downstream customer cases .-. 15:12:58 (referring to this page: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/#priorities) 15:13:07 last 4 weeks were a bit crazy here 15:13:13 :-( 15:13:17 yeah, I will push this today 15:13:27 thx iurygregory! 15:13:32 I added a few topics to the etherpad so we can start getting status etc 15:13:46 and not skipping because we don't have the patch with the priorities up 15:14:08 * arne_wiebalck thinks this is a nice plug for the SIG meeting next week: "Looking back and forward for Ironic" feat. iurygregory :-D 15:14:22 :D 15:16:29 we don't know power state :) 15:16:55 but https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-python-agent/+/839095 seems super simple/easy 15:17:23 nice! 15:17:48 I've needed brain unwind time on Fridays so I've been curning out WIPs 15:19:02 cool 15:19:05 iurygregory: w/r/t https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/836966, I'm kind of wondering if I can get multinode happy to let that be the skip job 15:19:19 I'm surprised it took so long for even me to look at the neutron logs though :( 15:19:46 I think it should be possible 15:20:00 but this would require us fixing multinode till wallaby I think? 15:20:04 then again, maybe phasing might make sense 15:20:11 possibly, but totally doable I think 15:20:26 just need to land base fixes before the actual next branch will work 15:20:28 we can totally give a try, let me know if you need any help in the multinode 15:20:34 well, the more recent branch 15:20:52 Okay, I think right now it is mostly poke it and run and diagnose, but I did a lot of that last week 15:21:01 ended up getting infra to hold nodes to dig through a failed deploy 15:21:28 wow, nice! 15:21:42 I didn't know we could ask them to keep the nodes 15:21:56 They are more than willing :) 15:22:43 good to know :D 15:22:55 ok, moving to our next topic o/ 15:23:18 #topic Deciding on priorities for the coming week 15:23:21 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+hashtag:ironic-week-prio 15:24:23 Does anyone have any patches that needs attention? 15:25:04 I've added the l-c ones, I also saw some possible fixes for CI in other branches, so I will be checking some projects and adding them 15:25:47 I've got nothign at the moment 15:27:05 maybe https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/839369 even if I need to understand why it's failing, and it looks like it's infra and not he job itself 15:27:27 rpittau, sure 15:27:44 A second vote on this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/837234 15:28:44 ebbex: +A 15:28:56 I thjought I approved that already :) 15:29:09 thanks :) 15:30:43 are we good to move to the next topic? 15:31:10 I think so 15:31:11 let's ! 15:31:24 #topic Baremetal SIG 15:31:30 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/bare-metal-sig 15:31:33 arne_wiebalck, o/ 15:32:19 Meeting planned for next week: 15:32:37 iurygregory with a retrospective and plans for Zed 15:32:54 thanks iurygregory for "volunteering" :-D 15:33:10 np =) happy to help :D 15:33:22 then, the meeting for June we probably cancel due to the summit 15:33:38 do you have any updates regarding the forum session? 15:33:42 ++ 15:33:53 any objections to drop the June meeting (i.e. volunteers to present)? 15:34:07 forum session ... no, I have not heard anything 15:34:18 were notifications sent already? 15:34:38 ack, no objections from me (except if we have someone to present something) 15:34:41 maybe I missed it ... TheJulia you saw anyting? 15:34:53 I've seen nothing 15:34:58 hmm 15:35:13 TheJulia: but you saw I filed it, right? 15:35:46 I did 15:35:53 ok, phew 15:36:15 ohhh for those who are planning to go to the OIS and join the OPS meetup tickets are already available https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-meetup-tickets-322813472787 15:36:41 #info OPS meetup Berlin 15:36:44 #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-meetup-tickets-322813472787 15:36:45 I can try to find out what the status is for the SIG forum session 15:36:54 arne_wiebalck, tks! 15:36:57 since I know some sessions have been refused already 15:37:04 * arne_wiebalck is confused 15:37:13 It doesn't look like there are any forum items on the schedule yet 15:37:21 ok 15:38:05 FWIW, the ops meetup has a capped attendance 15:38:22 So, unless there is a really good reason or two, migh twant to think about it before just signing upf or it 15:38:28 It is also at a different venue 15:39:10 arne_wiebalck: want me to reach out to the foundation, I already have a long thread with foundation staff on some other stuff so its not a big deal for me to bring up? 15:39:18 w/r/t forum 15:39:24 that would be great, thanks! 15:40:01 ops meetup: will the late announcement be a problem for those having more complicated travel? 15:40:52 not SIG related, I was just thinking when I saw the announcement that people may have made their plans already 15:41:28 I need to talk with my manager about attending the OPS meetup 15:41:28 anyway ... I am good for the SIG :) 15:41:35 email sent 15:41:35 I did take this possibility into account while booking the travel 15:41:57 but yeah, formally speaking, it has an entrance fee, and I don't feel right to pay it out of my pocket :) (although I may) 15:42:09 I also took it into account, but also I had to add a couple days for sane return ticket prices 15:42:13 dtantsur: right, I was mostly thinking about folks from the U.S. which may had to book some months ago 15:42:16 same ^ 15:42:34 * TheJulia booked flights on Friday 15:42:50 The ops twitter account if memory serves did ask for folks to save the date 15:43:00 U.S. or anywhere else a little farther away 15:43:27 could be planned/announced together maybe 15:43:44 Possibly 15:44:35 we don't have items in RFE review, skipping 15:44:41 #topic Open discussion 15:44:54 this is probably what we are already doing :D 15:44:58 I suspect there is going to be a drive to try and more integrate/tightly couple feedback/interaction between developer and ops 15:45:16 but only time will tell 15:46:28 I need to drop but I just wanted to point out that the grenade job in inspector is failing, didn't have time to investigate too deep, just saw an error in nova not able to allocate more ports 15:46:55 wtf 15:46:59 rpittau, tks for the heads-up! I will try to look 15:47:25 you can see the failure in the drop l-c patch 15:47:37 see you tomorrow o/ 15:47:47 o/ 15:49:00 bye rpittau 15:49:12 ok I think we can end our meeting today =) 15:49:51 I will run the meeting next week o/ 15:49:55 Thanks everyone! 15:50:06 thx iurygregory! 15:50:10 #endmeeting