15:00:10 #startmeeting ironic 15:00:12 Meeting started Mon Nov 2 15:00:10 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dtantsur. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 15:00:31 let's see how many people get mislead by their calendars :) 15:00:35 o/ 15:00:39 o/ 15:00:42 o/ 15:00:48 hi everyone 15:00:48 o/ 15:01:12 o/ 15:01:16 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic is our agenda 15:01:31 o/ 15:01:48 #topic Announcements / Reminder 15:02:01 Thank you everyone for the great Forum and PTG! 15:02:57 #info Initial Wallaby proposed priorities document up for review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/760460 15:02:58 patch 760460 - ironic-specs - Add Wallaby priorities - 1 patch set 15:03:09 I think this is the top priority this week. just keep in mind that: 15:03:16 #info PTL on PTO first week in November 15:03:25 o/ 15:03:42 Julia is enjoying the well deserved PTO, but it shouldn't prevent anyone from thinking about priorities 15:04:06 \o 15:04:27 anything else to announce or remind of? 15:04:33 dtantsur: perhaps someone could take over/update that PR to get it 'moving'? 15:04:34 o/ 15:04:53 rloo: yeah, I can try take a look later this week 15:05:11 ++ (might be a nice surprise for julia if we approve it this week!) 15:05:26 not bad indeed :) 15:05:44 anything else? 15:06:49 no action items last time and statuses don't make much sense yet, so 15:06:56 #topic Deciding on priorities for the coming week 15:07:16 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard line 123 15:07:27 I think we can all agree that the priorities is the priority :) 15:07:45 yeah 15:07:49 yes 15:08:35 ++ 15:09:17 dtantsur: one thing i asked in the priorities PR -- community goals. I wasn't even sure what the wallaby goals were. 15:10:13 privsep, I think* 15:10:15 ? 15:10:20 I don't remember for sure 15:10:37 yes 15:10:40 correct dtantsur 15:10:48 whatever/if there are others, we might need to discuss as a team 15:12:01 yeah 15:12:49 oh. spuc. is there one this friday? 15:12:54 okay, I've put a few patches on the list, is there anything else people want to see there 15:13:04 rloo: yes! I'll announce on the ML once I'll calculate the votes 15:13:19 thx 15:13:30 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-October/018393.html SPUC 15:13:40 Fedor Tarasenko proposed openstack/ironic-python-agent stable/victoria: Support using LABEL as identifier for rootfs https://review.opendev.org/760940 15:14:47 o/ 15:14:51 freaking winter time 15:14:58 hehe 15:15:01 yeah 15:15:04 sorry :/ 15:15:53 no worries 15:15:57 does the list look good? 15:16:52 ++ 15:17:06 yep 15:17:42 #topic Baremetal SIG 15:17:50 #info Next meeting scheduled for Tue Nov 10 2pm UTC 15:17:53 arne_wiebalck: anything else? 15:18:09 TheJulia will be our first presenter :) 15:18:16 Nothing else, no. 15:18:26 don't miss a chance to see Julia presenting! 15:18:30 lol 15:18:33 ++ 15:18:39 :) 15:18:50 #topic RFE review 15:18:54 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008023 15:18:59 xinliang: hi, around? 15:19:04 yeah 15:19:09 the mic is yours 15:19:12 hi Ironic team 15:19:59 Yeah, just want to know this RFE is reasonable for Ironic community 15:20:22 it looks sane from a quick glance. I see that kaifeng wanted to have a spec? 15:20:40 in this case you need to write a new one rather than updating https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759839/ 15:20:41 patch 759839 - ironic-specs - Add PXE boot from iSCSI volume scenario - 2 patch sets 15:21:04 Yeah, so I add a scenario 15:22:03 dtantsur: I agree with you that track it in RFE 15:22:20 I'm fine with RFE only but I'd like to hear from other folks 15:23:04 kaifeng said: this is a new workflow of pxe based bfv, this might not fit into current ipxe implementation thus needs structural considerations 15:23:30 Fedor Tarasenko proposed openstack/ironic-python-agent master: Support using LABEL as identifier for rootfs https://review.opendev.org/760946 15:24:16 I just finished reading the rfe and the comments 15:24:28 In fact, it just not a big feature, just enhance PXE boot interface, seems all other logics are same as iPXE 15:24:39 dtantsur: kaifeng said this on the chat or is there another doc besides the RFE? 15:24:40 if there is a new workflow we may need a spec 15:25:06 arne_wiebalck: in the RFE comments 15:25:27 dtantsur: yes, found this meanwhile, sorry 15:27:13 I think two people requested a spec, kaifeng and iurygregory? 15:27:27 so, is the consensus that xinliang writes a new spec? 15:27:33 make 3 15:27:34 yeah 15:27:43 dtantsur: Sure, I can write a new one 15:28:00 thank you xinliang! 15:28:04 i think a spec may help with the discussion, judging by the initial patch I am still not very clear on the path 15:28:50 tks! 15:28:53 anything else on this topic? 15:29:01 Yes, I will document everything in the spec 15:29:07 great 15:29:17 #topic Open discussion 15:29:34 There is one item about 'baremetal' vs 'openstack baremetal', but I think we already discussed it? 15:29:42 and the patch in question has merged 15:29:52 old meeting =) 15:29:58 sorry I didn't remove 15:30:31 no worries, I'll clean up afterwards 15:30:40 anything else to discuss? 15:31:07 if not, I'll give you half an hour back 15:31:46 half magic hour 15:31:52 :) 15:31:54 #endmeeting