17:00:32 #startmeeting ironic 17:00:33 Meeting started Mon Jan 29 17:00:32 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is TheJulia. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:34 o/ 17:00:36 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 17:00:38 \o/ 17:00:45 o/ 17:00:54 O/ reo 17:00:58 \o 17:00:59 o/ 17:01:07 o/ 17:01:07 o/ 17:01:07 o/ 17:01:19 o/ 17:01:20 o/ 17:01:25 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic 17:01:35 As always, our agenda can be found on the wiki 17:01:40 o/ 17:02:06 o/ 17:02:06 #topic Announcements / Reminder 17:02:32 * rloo thinks folks haven't updated their subteam status reports... do it now, quick... :) 17:02:38 #info Feature Freeze started last Thursday 17:02:58 #info Hard freeze starts this Friday, Feburary 2nd. 17:03:44 #info Please expect our release to be cut anytime between Friday February 2nd and Feburary 8th. 17:04:10 TheJulia: really? given our FFE is until Feb 2... 17:04:39 o/ 17:04:45 #info Only bug fixes should be landed after this Friday. All features with Feature Freeze Exceptions must be landed by Feb 2nd. 17:05:03 o/ 17:05:22 Anyone have anything else announcement or reminder wise? 17:05:26 TheJulia: hard string freeze is week of Feb 5. what is 'hard freeze' ^^ ? 17:05:49 TheJulia: https://releases.openstack.org/queens/schedule.html 17:06:27 rloo: Hard freeze as in we're done for the cycle and are ready to cut our branch. 17:06:37 reminder about ptg? ptl election? 17:06:57 TheJulia: rc1 target week is the hard freeze, right? (next week) 17:07:01 Since we don't cut an RC, we need to be ready to cut our branch early unless we want to have fun cherry picking 17:07:40 TheJulia: right, i think that we want ours to be in sync with rc1 17:07:42 o/ 17:07:55 yeah, I believe we did want to cut at the same time that everyone else does rc1 17:07:56 #info PTL nominations start later today \o/ 17:08:48 #info The PTG is coming, please submit topics to the etherpad before Feb 15th. 17:08:50 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-rocky-ptg 17:08:57 jroll: correct 17:09:17 Wow, this was an annoucement/reminder heavy day 17:09:29 If there is nothing else, we should move on 17:09:41 right, so to be clear: feb 2: deadline for landing any feature, FFE or not, to ironic. feb 9: goal to cut stable/queens branch. yes? 17:10:08 jroll: Correct 17:10:16 jroll: yup. although we should try for feb 8 (Thurs). 17:10:17 Unrelated. I have to say I'm glad we have our own 'gate' queue. Otherwise our patches would still be in the process of landing :) 17:10:24 excellent. thanks 17:10:37 thx jlvillal :) 17:10:54 I didn't do it. Someone else did it before me. I was just cleaning up some stragglers. 17:11:07 #topic Review action items from previous meeting 17:11:16 But nothing of ours was in the 'integrated' queue. Which is the really big one. 17:11:17 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2018/ironic.2018-01-22-17.00.html 17:11:42 Our only action item from last week was that mjturek would take care of bug triaging this week. mjturek, anything to report? 17:12:36 TheJulia: should we enable the multinode-grenade job as voting? 17:12:36 TheJulia nothing really, there were a couple of IPv6 bugs that I looked at 17:12:50 mjturek: Awesome, thanks! 17:13:00 np! 17:13:22 (sorry, TheJulia, I'll take that off line about the grenade job) 17:13:23 rloo: Perhaps discussion, although personally I've not had a chance to dig through logs and really evaluate the failure rate with recent gate issues 17:13:33 #topic Review subteam status reports 17:13:40 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard 17:14:04 Starting around line 232 :) 17:15:32 I think the largest thing of note is that we were able to land quite a bit last week, and we were able to release python-ironicclient with client negotiation changes as well as support for traits. Resuce support did not make it into the client :( 17:15:39 TheJulia: could you update version negotiation? i just quickly updated drivers deprecation 17:17:44 jroll: wrt traits, did you push up a patch to test in nova? 17:18:07 jroll: ah, i see it. thx :) 17:18:17 rloo: yeah, we decided just to use functional tests for now 17:18:36 rloo: done 17:18:40 jroll: great. looks like the nova patches have all been approved, just waiting to land! 17:18:46 yep :) 17:18:50 we dun good 17:19:09 * TheJulia shifts out of the slowly shifting day star beam 17:19:29 Okay, I can see again 17:20:10 rloo: I _think_ we are done with the auth rework 17:20:49 TheJulia: ok. i can't even see it on the etherpad. too many things... 17:21:05 Yeah, the etherpad needs a good cleanup 17:21:34 I think we are good to move on? 17:21:39 TheJulia: found it, i updated with DONE 17:21:55 ++ to clean up 17:21:58 ++ to moving on 17:22:04 +1 17:22:24 #topic Deciding on priorities for the next week 17:22:27 TheJulia: darn, i have a question about version negotiation 17:22:32 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard 17:22:37 rloo: ask ? :) 17:22:38 TheJulia: is there anything more that needs to be done for that? in nova? 17:22:49 rloo: at this point, negotiation/discussion 17:23:05 TheJulia: ok, no more patches for queens. thx. 17:23:06 I think we're not doing anything else with that until after the PTG 17:23:11 rloo: correct 17:23:17 TheJulia: do we need to discuss with nova at ptg? 17:23:32 we should be able to discuss it outside of the ptg, but yeah, nothing for queens 17:23:35 Okay, as for priorities, rloo created a list of Feature Freeze Exceptions and patches starting on line 157 17:23:42 I thought we had agreed at some level 17:24:09 jroll: we kind of had, but at the same time the sands have shifted if that makes sense 17:24:31 I guess, I think folks were just opposed to rushing it :) 17:25:44 jroll, TheJulia: I think it makes sense to touch base with nova and make sure we're all in agreement. at or outside ptg :) 17:25:57 yep 17:25:58 jroll: that and the original person that drove the ask has stepped out of the community 17:26:02 i'll make a note of it in etherpad 17:26:18 As for priorities, I think we should work from the FFE list this week 17:27:02 TheJulia: i didn't prioritize that list. it seems like routed networks is the highest? 17:27:03 sambetts did propose a vif locking bug fix I submitted as another thing we would likely want to try and land, since it will help improve gate reliability as well 17:27:26 TheJulia: bugs. yeah... someone needs to go through bugs, see which ones we might want to try to land. 17:27:45 rloo: I think routed networks might be good to have as best because traits is basically at docs at this point 17:27:49 s/best/highest/ 17:28:04 TheJulia: oh. and classic drivers deprecation. 17:28:07 rescue, we're going to need to sift through that list, and we're blocked on any osc-commands due to them not landing in the client 17:28:13 ++ 17:28:17 TheJulia: that might be #1 if we don't want to delay the deprecation etc. 17:28:39 rloo: I agree with that 17:29:30 TheJulia: do you want to massage that for the priorities or do you want me to do it. nowish i guess... 17:29:44 rloo: sure 17:30:08 and by the way, there are a lot of patches for routed networks. would be good if someone could indicate which 'need' to land. 17:30:50 Oneview and ilo uefi iscsi boot just need follow-ups it looks like. 17:30:59 for routed networks at least 521838, 536040 and 537353. since we landed the agent, we need the mech driver updated to actually use the agent_db data. 17:31:16 hjensas: would you tag those as needed in the list? 17:31:35 TheJulia: yes. 17:32:17 I've updated the rescue item to note that we need to review that and block at devstack changes 17:32:28 I can do that after the meeting 17:32:34 Thx TheJulia! 17:32:59 TheJulia: do you have a link to the vif bug? 17:33:08 #action TheJulia to review rescue patches and block at appropriate place for devstack to hold for the next cycle. 17:33:43 rloo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534441/4 17:33:44 patch 534441 - ironic - Don't try to lock upfront for vif removal 17:34:24 Is anyone else aware of any bugs that we need to address this week? 17:35:03 * TheJulia guesses not at this time 17:35:06 TheJulia: I added that bug to the prioriites. we can add more if there are any. 17:35:12 TheJulia: but we don't really have bugs in our code so ... 17:35:35 never 17:35:39 rloo: Thanks! I think the priorities for this week are good, lots of patches, but many of them are smaller changes 17:35:41 rloo: only features 17:35:48 heh 17:36:06 I think we're good to move on 17:36:15 Any objections? 17:36:24 ++ I'm good with the priorities and to moving on 17:36:58 #topic Appointing a bug triaging lead for the coming week 17:37:07 Anyone up for volunteering this week? 17:37:10 I'm good with continuing 17:37:20 mjturek: Awesome, thanks! 17:37:33 np 17:37:40 #action mjturek to lead bug triage this next week. 17:38:36 Since we have no discussion topics, I think we should just skip to Open Discussion, unless someone has RFEs that need review? 17:38:52 * TheJulia will accept the crickets as confirmation that we can move to open discussion :) 17:39:00 ++ 17:39:15 ++ 17:39:53 Okay, moving on! 17:40:04 #topic Open Discussion 17:40:16 Does anyone have any topics to bring up for discussion today? 17:40:31 * jroll does not 17:40:40 are these meetings useful? 17:40:52 wait, let's not discuss that. 17:41:00 heh 17:41:17 crickets 17:41:17 I suspect they're more useful for people like me that are not plugged in 40+ hours/week 17:41:27 lol 17:41:48 good, i thought maybe it was only useful for more 'project management' related folks. 17:41:53 jroll: Yeah, very much so, and force a checkpoint for those of us who are plugged into it 17:42:21 nod 17:42:44 are we waiting now for ... crickets... 17:43:03 Yes, the creation of crickets as a service :) 17:43:18 Well, thanks everyone! Have a wonderful week! 17:43:35 #endmeeting