17:00:00 #startmeeting ironic 17:00:01 Meeting started Mon Jun 6 17:00:00 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jroll. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:05 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 17:00:06 ohai everyone 17:00:10 o/ 17:00:10 o/ 17:00:19 o/ 17:00:22 \o 17:00:27 o/ 17:00:36 o/ 17:00:37 * jroll is hungry so will try to keep this short 17:00:46 o/ 17:00:49 o/ 17:00:52 agenda is here: 17:00:54 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_next_meeting 17:00:55 o/ 17:00:57 #chair devananda NobodyCam 17:00:58 Current chairs: NobodyCam devananda jroll 17:01:02 o/ 17:01:02 o/ 17:01:03 * TheJulia thanks jroll in advance for the same reason 17:01:06 #topic Announcements and reminders 17:01:10 o/ 17:01:20 o/ 17:01:29 o/ 17:01:37 o/ 17:01:39 so, as I emailed about last week, I made a trello board to try to get us organized 17:01:41 #link https://trello.com/b/ROTxmGIc/ironic-newton-priorities 17:02:03 thx jroll! 17:02:05 I also made an etherpad for midcycle topics: 17:02:06 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-midcycle 17:02:23 I'll flesh that out with times/etc soon 17:02:27 anyone have other announcements or reminders? 17:03:04 o/ 17:03:04 yes 17:03:14 krtaylor: shoot 17:03:20 here's a link to the ironic social pics 17:03:23 http://www.kurttaylor.com/blog/2016/05/austin-summit-ironic-social/ 17:03:35 nice! :) 17:03:35 #link http://www.kurttaylor.com/blog/2016/05/austin-summit-ironic-social/ 17:03:38 thought ya'll might want to see 17:03:41 cool :) 17:03:44 krtaylor: nice! thanks 17:03:52 thx krtaylor! 17:03:58 (and victoria) 17:04:15 you're welcome, it was fun! 17:04:17 cool! 17:04:37 awesome thank you krtaylor 17:05:17 click the thumbnails for larger pics 17:05:26 * jroll moves on 17:05:28 anyway, that's it for now 17:05:28 #topic subteam status reports 17:05:33 \o 17:05:39 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard 17:05:44 beginning at line 75 this week 17:06:06 * jroll gives folks a few minutes to peruse 17:06:10 FYI: Grenade is down to six patches remaining to be merged. Two of which are Ironic patches. 17:06:37 jlvillal what do you mean grenade is down? 17:06:52 vsaienko1: "down to six patches" 17:07:01 vsaienko1: only 6 left 17:07:07 vsaienko1: Sorry I meant. Grenade work is only needing six patches to complete. 17:07:38 vsaienko1: Down as in decreasing. We are were at 12 patches and now we are down to six patches. As an example. 17:07:38 so, as a note, we might consider replacing this with the trello board, for the priorities things at least 17:07:42 something to think about 17:08:09 jroll: replacing 'this' -- what is 'this'? the meeting? 17:08:13 \o/ for inspector dropping the bash ramdisk 17:08:18 rloo: this topic, the subteam updates 17:08:31 jroll: Add a link to the Trello board in the whiteboard? 17:08:32 jroll: i thought of that but not all subteams are in trello 17:08:57 rloo: right, I'm publicizing your idea, just something to think about for now. hence the "at least for priorities things" 17:09:00 jroll: At the top of the whiteboard. A thought. 17:09:14 jlvillal: i was thinking of adding the trello card links to the subteams. 17:09:18 jlvillal: you can edit etherpad too :) 17:09:19 rloo++ 17:09:21 jlvillal: where appropriate 17:09:22 jlvillal: done in the Dashboards section 17:09:33 sambetts++ 17:09:36 rloo: Sounds good. 17:09:49 jlvillal: will do later when i generate the report 17:10:19 thanks rloo :) 17:10:21 any questions/comments on what's in the subteam updates this week? 17:10:58 wrt the network isolation. any one tested those with grenade? 17:11:17 rloo, I think we did not 17:11:20 rloo probably nope 17:11:22 not that I know of, that would be good 17:11:43 yeah, once i know it has been tested (and passes) grenade, i'll start reviewing again 17:11:46 a usual reminder to review the driver composition spec :) 17:11:58 a couple of folks did it, but I'd love more opinions 17:12:08 link: https://review.openstack.org/188370 17:12:16 #link https://review.openstack.org/188370 17:12:46 anything else? 17:13:08 nothing in the main topics, so 17:13:12 #topic open discussion 17:13:21 hshiina asks "Could we get nova BPs depending on ironic approved as spec-less BPs like serial console one?" 17:13:58 doesn't it depend on the nova BP? 17:14:10 hshiina: you'll need to ask nova folks about that one; I suspect soft power off would be spec-less, not sure about the other two (NMI is a new feature in nova, right? and boot from volume idk what all is involved) 17:14:33 rloo: yeah, it's case by case 17:14:38 yes. 17:14:49 hshiina: the process is to add it to the nova meeting agenda, and be there to discuss 17:15:05 hshiina: though, you should wait until ironic approves those to do so 17:15:11 hshiina: my understanding is boot from volume also had a spec proposed in nova, but it makes little sense to push until we've landed support for it 17:15:43 right, cuz that will be one of the first questions from nova folks; is the ironic-side approved :) 17:15:45 i asked once last nova meeting. 17:15:54 then not approved. 17:15:57 hshiina: what did they say? 17:16:09 hshiina: what did you ask? 17:16:47 jroll, it is necceccary that ironic specs are merged. 17:17:05 and speaking of nova, i noticed they have a 'history' section at the bottom of their specs. something we might want to add in ironic specs? 17:17:26 hshiina: reading the logs, mriedem said that the BP should be updated to show the dependency, and the ironic spec merged, and then he will approve 17:17:37 hshiina: so, once those are done, just talk to mriedem 17:17:49 most (all?) of us here can't approve nova BPs :) 17:18:11 serial console spec was approved though ironic spec is still ongoing. 17:18:31 sounds like a mistake 17:18:38 s/console spec/console bp/ 17:18:51 anyway, nothing we can do about it in this meeting 17:19:07 (and let's get the console spec done ASAP so that mistake is no longer there) 17:19:59 ok. i also hope console spec will be done soon. 17:20:20 agree 17:20:24 anything else for open discussion? 17:20:29 thanks. 17:20:36 hshiina: you're welcome :) 17:20:41 thanks for bringing it up 17:22:05 okay, seems like there's nothing more to discuss, thanks all for the quick meeting :) 17:22:15 I could ask for a review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272658/ 17:22:19 :p 17:22:40 heh 17:22:43 Thanks every one ... good meeting 17:22:47 #endmeeting