16:01:48 #startmeeting interopwg 16:01:49 Meeting started Wed Jul 25 16:01:48 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is eglute_s. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:53 The meeting name has been set to 'interopwg' 16:01:54 hi! 16:01:57 Hi 16:01:59 o/ 16:02:03 #chair hogepodge markvoelker 16:02:04 Current chairs: eglute_s hogepodge markvoelker 16:02:16 #topic agenda 16:02:24 Hello Everyone! 16:02:41 Today's agenda, please update as needed: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropWhistler.15 16:03:50 #topic PTG 16:04:21 hogepodge do you know if interop already scheduled for PTG? 16:04:47 yes, I'll dig it up 16:05:15 #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/#tab_schedule ptg schedule 16:05:15 that would be great 16:05:48 Thanks, looks like interop is on Tuesday 16:06:05 will it be shared with refstack again? 16:06:57 eglute_s: Would make sense, no? 16:07:27 yes, that's what we have done in the past 16:07:45 I am not planning on attending PTG this time 16:07:56 but i know hogepodge and markvoelker will be attending 16:08:07 yep, will be there 16:08:20 I'll be there 16:08:45 great! 16:09:05 anything else regarding ptg? 16:09:16 #topic Deprecate volume reserve/unreserve capability 16:09:26 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583970/ 16:09:36 if you haven't reviewed it yet, please do so 16:10:03 looks like i missed the part that it needs to be deprecated 16:11:42 #topic Scoring 2018.08 16:11:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/585772/ 16:12:03 thanks markvoelker for creating that 16:12:07 i will review it soon 16:12:12 sure thing 16:12:47 markvoelker any updates on nova scoring? 16:13:44 Nope, it's been quiet thus far. MultipleCreateTestJSON is one I'm looking at 16:13:58 #link https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/306be6ce35652ca6273745b692aed3e681b30d8c/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_multiple_create.py#L21 16:14:27 what does that do? 16:15:05 creates multiple servers at once? or something else? 16:15:51 It deals with creating multiple servers (which also happens to be a thing that happens in the NFV world quite a bit) 16:16:17 ah ok 16:16:51 doesn't seem too promising htne 16:16:57 I frequently use it in my home lab to bring up a batch of bare metal servers to deploy things on. 16:17:24 ok... markvoelker do you think it might make it as advisory? 16:17:27 YEah, it's been around forever and is not specific to any particular backend, so I suspect it'll easily meet several of our criteria. 16:17:49 Just need to dig into things like used by tools a bit more 16:17:57 It's actually a nice feature to have when you need to bring up a service cluster. 16:18:25 nice 16:18:27 cool 16:19:29 markvoelker any updates on neutron scoring? 16:19:30 so we don't have any other test case that creates 2 servers with one API call yet 16:19:33 ? 16:20:23 Looks useful to me then, yeah 16:20:43 nope, nothing new there so far 16:21:19 cool, thanks 16:21:34 for glance, I submitted scoring update 16:21:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/585606/ 16:22:02 According to PTL the Image Import is now fully supported (the work was done specifically as request by the interop group), and will be available in Rocky. It was experimental in previous releases. The tests are not yet available, but might be ready by the fall. 16:22:29 so i am not sure if we want to push for advisory for this time around, even if the tests are available in tim 16:22:31 in time 16:23:28 thoughts? 16:23:46 No tests and it only scored 44 which is well below the cutoff score we typically use...I would say wait. 16:24:48 yeah, that's what i was thinking. Likely the score could go up a little, was being conservative. 16:25:17 It is relevant to InterOp though - adding the ability to move images from one env to another one .. 16:25:34 kgarloff agree... but the feature is barely being released. 16:25:54 they did add it because we asked for it, but it is too new 16:26:12 eglute_s: Fair point. I guess we need to wait then ... 16:26:35 advisory in 2019.0x then hopefully 16:26:51 kgarloff yes... hopefully people start using it immediately and adopt it :) 16:27:13 hogepodge do you know if mguiney has any updates for cinder? 16:27:57 no updates, she's also moved on to a position at Intel, so I should take over that patch. 16:28:47 hogepodge thanks for the update 16:29:33 hogepodge how about keystone? 16:29:53 noting new on my side, I need to put the work in 16:30:46 cool thanks 16:31:06 same for swift? 16:31:14 yup 16:31:25 markvoelker do you think there will be any changes for Heat? 16:32:53 Well, there are definitely some things to move status on...e.g. from advisory to required, etc. 16:33:43 ok, cool. I accidentally skipped the topic on when the next guideline is, so i think we have time to follow up on all the outstanding tasks 16:33:53 regarding DNS add-on, I pinged PTL again, waiting to hear back 16:34:22 markvoelker no updates on NFV either? 16:34:52 Nope, none today 16:35:12 cool 16:35:26 #topic next guideline 16:35:34 so i accidentally skipped it 16:35:54 but i think it is best if we move it to november, for the board to approve it then 16:36:04 since thats when the next in-person meeting is 16:36:12 will you all come to Berlin? 16:36:26 I'm planning to be there 16:36:52 yes, i am planning. I am sure the weather will be nice and balmy mid november. 16:37:33 eglute_s: currently we sweat at >35C, I can guarantee that not to be the case in Nov :-) 16:37:57 kgarloff heh, i will be happy if we don't get snowed in! :D 16:38:08 I'll be in Berlin 16:38:17 Unlike Dublin, the folks are able to handle it in Berlin ... 16:38:36 Good to see zou all there! So then we probably should do the board vote there as well, yes 16:39:24 kgarloff glad to hear it! 16:39:42 anything else for today? I am on vacation next week 16:39:53 but should be back in time for the next meeting 16:40:35 thanks everyone! 16:40:38 #endmeeting