20:00:22 #startmeeting horizon 20:00:23 Meeting started Wed Sep 27 20:00:22 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ying_zuo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:26 The meeting name has been set to 'horizon' 20:00:35 Hi everyone :) 20:00:51 Hi 20:00:59 o/ 20:01:01 o/ 20:01:07 o/ 20:01:56 o/ 20:02:00 #topic Notices 20:02:05 #info Stable Releases 20:02:12 There have been a few patches merged since the last release of stable/ocata and stable/pike, so I am planning to cut another release for them in a few days. 20:02:20 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497739/ 20:02:26 This will be the last patch included in the next stable/ocata release. 20:02:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/505986/ 20:02:49 If this one looks good to other cores, it will be the last one included in the next stable/pike release. 20:04:07 #info Forum Sessions for Sydney Summit 20:04:16 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-sydney-forum-topics 20:04:23 I will propose a session to gather user feedback for Horizon. If you have any questions or suggested topics for the session, please add them on this etherpad. 20:04:23 o/ 20:04:58 Other than this feedback session, are there any other sessions that anyone wants to suggest? 20:05:49 are they doing onboarding sessions again? 20:05:58 I think so 20:06:07 we skipped last time, might be worthwhile 20:06:13 we can propose that 20:06:20 I think attendance was hit or miss 20:06:22 yes, I think that will be good too 20:06:26 i don't find any in the schedule, guess not posted yet? 20:06:33 I'm afraid of not many developers will attend this Summit :( 20:06:46 schedule for the summit is posted on the website 20:07:04 the schedule for forum has not been set 20:07:06 these may be separate, not sure 20:07:34 the deadline to propose the forum sessions for all the teams is this Friday 20:07:37 yeah, i mean the on-board sessions. last time was there 20:07:51 okay. 20:08:14 ok, they may have done away with those, I haven't seen an email about them either 20:09:00 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-September/121783.html 20:09:55 it's not tagged properly so I missed initially with my email filter too 20:09:55 o/ Sorry I'm late 20:10:16 I don't that type mentioned in there 20:10:23 *don't see 20:10:36 onboarding session? 20:10:42 yes 20:10:55 I think that's considered as a forum session 20:11:02 may have quietly killed the idea 20:11:29 I will go ahead and propose that :) 20:11:34 ying_zuo: Right, but they dont mention it in the email either 20:11:42 Can't hurt to ask though. 20:12:53 yes 20:13:09 it's still up to them to approve it or not 20:15:08 okay. I will propose the feedback session and onboarding session 20:15:26 #topic Bugs Review 20:15:35 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1713724 20:15:36 Launchpad bug 1713724 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Edit project validates quota against resources used in current project instead of edited project." [High,Confirmed] 20:16:46 Marked it as high because I didn't see a great workaround for it 20:17:28 I think it's high too 20:18:47 Whats the workaround, just scope to that project then edit? 20:19:35 that sounds like one 20:20:08 not necessarily 20:20:25 you would have to have the right role on that project scoping 20:20:39 that was my thought as well. Might not have the right role 20:21:12 passing the project id as an argument shouldn't be too complex 20:21:17 you mean the admin role? 20:21:32 ying_zuo, not necessarily 20:21:33 :) 20:21:35 Oh, but thats just a case of needing a more accurate error message if your role is incorrect then? Or filtering that info 20:21:56 but could be, whatever role enables you to edit quotas on a project 20:22:25 As in, we need to make sure we pass the right ID, but also return a useful message if they dont have the right role even when we do pass the right ID. 20:22:52 I am not really sure where there error is, now that I reread 20:23:06 we don't set quotas in the admin views 20:23:09 other than defaults 20:23:15 and those are cross-project 20:23:36 I'm guessing they mean the identity dash? 20:24:12 That's where I saw it. Identity > Projects > Modify Quotas 20:24:12 I assume so 20:24:29 (for a particular project) 20:24:36 I think they're using "admin interface" as a generic term, not meaning the Admin dash. 20:25:11 Luckily, neither "admin" nor "interface" are overloaded terms :p 20:25:11 yup, that's how I interpreted that term 20:29:03 if the user doesn't have the right role, then the manage quotas action shouldn't be visible 20:29:41 assuming the user has the right role, what can be cause for this issue? 20:30:08 project id not being passed in? 20:30:11 gary-smith, you could repro this? 20:30:17 ying_zuo, yes 20:30:33 If they have the role to manage the quota does it mean they have the ability to see and choose the project? 20:30:44 david-lyle: yes. it's pretty simple 20:30:49 quotas is a mess 20:31:04 +1 :( 20:31:06 it's a mix of project scope and admin scope 20:31:20 s/admin/domain/ 20:31:42 so we're making project scoped token calls when all other data is domain scoped 20:32:08 so you have to have the correct domain role and correct project role 20:32:23 I'll take it 20:32:52 thanks david-lyle 20:33:12 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1280094 20:33:14 Launchpad bug 1280094 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "admin password treachery" [Medium,Confirmed] 20:33:20 that relationship is why we don't show quotas for domain admins 20:33:25 fwiw 20:34:13 wow, 3.5 years old 20:34:17 :) 20:34:24 let's home the state of master is better ? 20:34:28 *hope 20:34:41 I'm sure they talked about axing this... 20:35:03 I know we added the ability to hide setting the admin pass 20:35:13 I'm not sure our documentation is any better 20:35:35 I'm fine with moving that to low at this point 20:35:48 hasn't seemed to be highly demanded 20:36:08 david-lyle: +1 to set lower priority for this 20:36:54 It looks like an improvement, not a bug, IMO 20:37:26 +1 20:38:06 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1288386 20:38:07 Launchpad bug 1288386 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Heat status column incorrect in horizon" [Medium,Confirmed] 20:39:38 Aren't we going to move Heat-related things to plugin? 20:40:03 yes. I guess we will skip those for now 20:40:15 tag it "heat" though 20:40:19 if it isnt already 20:40:26 +1 20:40:33 it is 20:40:40 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1292624 20:40:41 Launchpad bug 1292624 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "horizon messages not shown on redirect to logout" [Medium,Confirmed] 20:40:45 It has heat tag already 20:42:50 This bug clear for me 20:42:51 we add a logout reason now 20:43:01 not sure what the bug is 20:43:39 Mark it as incomplete? 20:43:54 yes, not sure how that will cause issue for logout 20:44:44 the last one for today 20:44:47 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1312781 20:44:49 Launchpad bug 1312781 in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) "Inconsistent data in the Overview Usage Summary" [Medium,Confirmed] 20:45:00 https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/horizon/middleware/base.py#L162 20:47:51 radomir did a bunch of work on the overview a little while back 20:47:53 ying_zuo: IMO, such things should be done using some monitoring tools, not horizon 20:47:57 dont know how much difference that made 20:48:11 e0ne_: It just hits the Nova API for some basic info iirc. 20:48:43 Its a bit of a weird API tbh, the stats it gives back aren't terribly useful in some regards 20:49:12 robcresswell: +1. We should show only that data, which is available via API's 20:49:37 not sure there is much to do on our end 20:49:57 david-lyle: that's what we're talking about 20:50:07 I know, agreeing :) 20:50:14 e0ne_: I agree, I'm just not sure the bug is saying we should do any more. I think, if anything, its saying show less of the API data to make it less confusing. Hard to tell. 20:50:15 :) 20:50:53 alrighty 20:50:57 wish list? 20:51:03 we got 10 minutes left 20:51:08 I don't think Nova API has something like requested in the bug 20:51:11 or incomplete? 20:51:20 tbh, mark wont fix 20:51:23 Won't fix 20:51:28 WFM 20:51:31 robcresswell: I did? 20:52:15 deshipu: I thought you looked at simple-tenant-usage a while back? 20:52:23 After some microversion / pagination change 20:52:33 robcresswell: ah, but that was just pagination 20:52:40 robcresswell: no user-visible changes 20:52:49 Yeah, I just thought you may have more input on the bug, thats all :) 20:52:53 But no worries 20:53:12 sorry I've been quiet, but I really don't have a clue 20:54:28 I guess we don't have time to start the open discussion today 20:54:40 5mins reminder 20:54:49 If you have any questions, please bring it up in #openstack-horizon 20:55:06 thanks everyone for joining :) 20:55:31 See you next week 20:55:35 o/ 20:55:37 bye 20:55:47 #endmeeting