16:01:05 #startmeeting Horizon 16:01:05 Meeting started Tue Mar 11 16:01:05 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is david-lyle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:10 The meeting name has been set to 'horizon' 16:01:17 Hello everyone! 16:01:19 hi everyone 16:01:20 o/ 16:01:27 hey 16:01:33 o/ 16:01:48 Hey 16:01:52 hi all 16:02:13 o/ 16:02:18 hello o/ 16:02:52 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon 16:03:07 #topic Welcome Radomir to Horizon Core 16:03:39 As of yesterday, Radomir was officially added to Horizon core. 16:04:07 Radomir is not here, but I am happy for him! :) 16:04:11 thank you david-lyle ! and well deserved Radomir! 16:04:11 Radomir has made many contributions, reviews and is highly involved in the tuskar-ui effort. 16:04:15 yes, congrats to Radomir!! 16:04:25 A welcome addition 16:04:30 Agreed 16:04:32 definitely well deserved 16:04:38 So congratulations to Radomir and thanks. 16:05:05 congrats to Radomir! 16:05:08 #topic Icehouse RC1 16:05:24 https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-rc1 16:05:48 we're looking good on the FFEs 16:06:28 david-lyle: Isn't the Django 1.6 one pretty much implemented now that the requirement change has gone through? 16:06:33 congrats radomir! 16:06:34 the django 1.6 patch just merged into Horizon and I'm going to post a patch to run the new tox env py27dj15 to maintain 1.5 testing 16:06:57 we can probably call it implemented 16:07:21 I also will release openstack_auth with a tox env to test 1.5 still 16:07:44 great, david-lyle! good that it landed 16:07:58 mrunge: was worried for a while :) 16:08:00 Great 16:08:13 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/per-user-quotas is the last FFE open 16:08:36 david-lyle: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32884/ (the django 1.4 job) may provide a few hints for the infra job, fwiw 16:09:34 ooh, nice, I just tracked down the yaml file thanks to infra, but looks like I needed another piece 16:09:49 thanks jpich 16:09:51 david-lyle: For my FFE - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/neutron-subnet-mode-support.. I had to update my review today 16:10:08 the neutron side is still in review.. but some changes had been made 16:10:30 absubram___, I think this will slip until Juno 16:10:44 FFEs should be merged by today 16:10:56 ok.. that's fine 16:11:03 since neutron is not there, we can't really do much 16:11:14 sure 16:11:25 I think they are still targeting I :) 16:11:33 sure 16:11:55 everybody is targeting Icehouse... 16:12:07 they _may_ land it today, or get more time, but that puts us out pretty far 16:12:07 but they made some changes to the update side.. and so I had to also.. but I have some Q's about the Horizon side for the update - sent out an email about it 16:12:29 and that change is breaking UT :(.. so need to fix it.. 16:12:56 but yeah.. pushing this out to J makes sense 16:13:16 mrunge: lol 16:13:32 absubram___, thanks for your effort here, unfortunately things didn't line up right 16:14:36 absubram___, I'll wait til the program status meeting today to push to Juno based on neutron team feedback 16:14:45 david-lyle: np.. thank you.. will continue working on getting it ready.. and it get's in J when the neutron side is also hopefully stable 16:15:19 sounds good.. thanks david 16:15:44 the per-user-quota FFE needs to either merge today by the program team meeting 21:00 UTC or it too will push to Juno 16:16:06 I have not had a chance to review it yet 16:16:30 seems to be a common theme on that bp 16:18:00 and last for rc1, are there any bugs that aren't assigned to the milestone that should be? 16:18:52 I must admit, I'm behind on the bug triage, so please target any that are high priority 16:19:19 or feel free to ping anyone else than david-lyle 16:19:23 e.g me 16:19:25 yes please :).. I have a few reviews out.. all are specific to the 'router' dashboard side 16:19:26 Or leave a comment so that people with triaging powerz can set it accordingly 16:20:17 can we target this one please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1288698 16:20:17 oh yes absubram___ you should use that plugin style for the router dashboard 16:20:29 (fix is already implemented, just needs one more core review) 16:20:49 akrivoka, done 16:20:53 mrunge: thanks! 16:20:53 yes I am.. and I like the new accordion style display too.. looks good :) 16:21:08 but these are bugs in code that went in during Havana.. minor nits 16:21:26 well… not very minor :) 16:21:32 regarding the accordion style, should we those minor things and smaller styling consider as bugs for Havana? 16:21:43 sorry 16:21:45 Icehouse :) 16:22:08 I am obviously one milestone behind :) 16:22:28 jcoufal, a release behind? 16:22:34 jcoufal, can you be more specific? 16:22:37 oh dear 16:22:55 david-lyle: sure 16:22:57 well 16:23:27 if there are errors we should certainly fix them 16:23:51 there were no errors more smaller corrections which you also mentioned previously 16:24:08 and we also discussed the styling enhancements in time 16:24:17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1229811 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1285298 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1260438 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1260435 https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1260436 16:24:28 all are in review.. and would love to get them into rc1 if possible :) 16:24:38 so I was just wondering if those are considered as bugs or features for Juno 16:25:25 like project picker 16:25:30 jcoufal, could you please be *more* specific? 16:25:36 likely features for Juno, as we are really in the hardening phase of the release cycle, but it's likely a case by case basis 16:25:47 jcoufal, or do you have a patch ready? 16:26:17 jcoufal, I would like the picker improved, to match the design, but at this point, it's not a small change 16:26:26 mrunge: nope, I was just wondering how it is considered, so case by case is valid answer 16:26:29 david-lyle: sure thing 16:26:43 absubram___, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48255/7 is waiting on your input.... 16:27:08 yes.. Working on responsding 16:27:39 jcoufal: let's concentrate on getting it right in Juno, if there are some minor fixes to improve/aid usability let's consider them 16:27:44 now 16:28:43 any other items for RC1? 16:29:37 #topic Design Summit Session Topics 16:29:52 Summit topic suggestion is open for the Juno summit. http://summit.openstack.org 16:30:09 how many slots do we have for horizon? 16:30:13 anyone is free to propose session topics 16:30:32 jcoufal: unclear, I would imagine the 6-8 16:30:49 I think maybe one less than last summit to allow for the cross-project sessions 16:30:59 but the total has not been communicated yet 16:31:25 alright it makes sense 16:31:31 Cross-project topics are also acceptable for the first time in a while 16:32:13 So please propose any topic ideas, I have a few, but would like to let others post theirs 16:32:31 jcoufal: I entered a "Other Project" session for a UX designers/developers gathering 16:32:53 jcoufal: happy to update this is you think it needs additions! 16:33:06 lblanchard: seen that, I wanted to do the same, but I am happy it's covered 16:33:19 jcoufal: cool 16:33:22 will definitely post some ideas what we can cover 16:33:27 jcoufal: perfect 16:33:37 thanks for thinking of this ;) 16:34:08 then one other session I proposed is around the usability test results that we've gotten from the testing over the last 2 weeks 16:34:14 I think UX overflow may need to use the unconference schedule, but not a bad idea to get the topics proposed 16:34:32 it went very well and we hope to have a bunch of design proposals and blueprints to share in a Horizon session if it's accepted! 16:34:50 david-lyle: yeah, we can definitely use unconference for topics too 16:34:52 david-lyle: I think at least one general topic is needed 16:34:57 the one liz proposed 16:35:07 jcoufal, I'm not disagreeing 16:35:29 but UX has a lot to talk about :) will take more than 40 minutes 16:35:37 david-lyle: we hope to do some lightening talks too if they are available just to get people to have awareness of UX, usabillity testing, personas, etc 16:35:47 great idea 16:36:09 david-lyle: yeah, we do :) 16:37:21 #topic Open Discussion 16:37:26 maybe we can have a short session for this - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/api-capability-detection 16:37:29 at the summit 16:38:25 absubram___, yes, we need to handle that for the keystone api in Juno as well as other services 16:38:29 and I also had some questions about UT that I wanted to bring up 16:39:21 general questions or specific? 16:39:40 specific would be better to go through in the regular room 16:43:51 Anyone have anything else? 16:44:08 Quick update on the Sparklines design…sayali, lsmola, and I have been discussing and this is one of the latest designs I put together. The hope is that we might be able to stack sparklines in the table and save some horizontal space…we are just targeting these two sparkline metrics for now: http://people.redhat.com/~lsurette/OpenStack/Sparkline%20Ideas 16:44:37 this image is missing the actions column…sorry about that :) But the general idea is consolidation of the sparklines 16:47:24 lblanchard: power state column is still present, and charted? 16:47:47 david-lyle: great question…might not need to have a column 16:48:11 david-lyle: I also asked about all of the possible states here…we might need more than just UP/DOWN 16:48:25 isn't sparklines a new feature and not a bug? 16:48:43 mrunge, yes would merge in Juno 16:48:43 mrunge: yes, sorry this is design work happening for a feature that will be pushed 16:50:06 lblanchard, yes some states are more than binary 16:50:35 I do like the idea 16:50:39 david-lyle: right 16:50:57 david-lyle: thanks…still a work in progress, just wanted to update everyone 16:51:15 thanks lblanchard 16:51:21 yes thank you 16:54:03 Let's end a little early today. Thank you everyone. 16:54:09 #endmeeting