16:18:10 #startmeeting Hierarchical Multitenancy 16:18:11 Meeting started Fri May 23 16:18:10 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vishy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:18:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:18:14 The meeting name has been set to 'hierarchical_multitenancy' 16:18:33 #topic next steps 16:18:49 so I’m wondering if we can modify the nova prototype 16:19:14 and just have a dummy call to keystoneclient 16:19:31 i.e. fakekeystoneclient.get_hierarchy(project_id) 16:19:43 vishy, that wouldn't be a bad approach for now. 16:19:46 which returns parents, children 16:19:53 sounds good to me 16:20:10 that is good 16:20:17 where each one is a tuple of (id, name) 16:20:20 I have to change the implementation of inherited roles in keystone 16:20:46 morganfainberg: could you use raildo1’s help with that one? 16:21:05 so I wouldn’t mind doing the nova prototype 16:21:14 we also need a list matcher in policy 16:21:30 instead of a prefix matcher 16:21:43 vishy, yeah i could use help there as I'm really impacted over the next week or 2 16:22:19 #action raildo1 to help morganfainberg on role inheritance 16:22:37 can you give raildo1 some tips as the best way to implement it? 16:22:57 unfortunately i won’t have time to prototype stuff for a week or two 16:23:07 doing too much nova-network hacking at the moment 16:23:17 yeah i'll work with raildo1 to get some general guidelines 16:23:23 so if anyone else wants to tackle that part in the meantime i don’t mind 16:23:27 we can work from there. 16:24:11 I'm glad to help in this projects. 16:24:11 Sajeesh: summit decision was domain related stuff does not belong in the projects 16:24:12 once i have some more spare time i'll be working more directly on the real implementation within keystone i think as well. so however we start it here for POC purposes will help direct that work 16:24:19 project* 16:24:37 vishy:ok 16:24:50 so it will have to be nested project quotas 16:25:17 so basically it will look like checking the quota for all of the parent projects 16:25:21 jaypipes: ping 16:25:37 ok 16:25:54 jaypipes: was talking about optimizing the quota code during this cycle to do multiple reservations in one request 16:26:19 we probably will need to do multiple projects in one request as well to get any kind of reasonable perf out of this 16:26:58 vishy, hm. yeah. 16:33:30 vishy:I am glad to work in this poject....in which area should I work? 16:36:23 .away 16:48:40 vishy: on phone... wil be with you in a bit 16:51:43 vishy, jaypipes, need to run i'll read back logs here/nova channel/etc when i'm back. 16:53:28 Sajeesh: sorry had to relocate 16:53:52 Sajeesh: want to try redoing the nova poc with the new call? 16:54:09 that i mentioned above? 16:54:27 #endmeeting