13:00:35 #startmeeting heat 13:00:36 Meeting started Wed Dec 20 13:00:35 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ricolin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:37 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 13:00:41 #topic roll call 13:00:56 o/ 13:01:00 o/ 13:01:25 hi 13:01:33 Hi 13:01:53 o/ 13:02:14 #topic adding items to agenda 13:02:16 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282017-12-20_1300_UTC.29 13:02:52 I got integrationtests and Ceilometer resources 13:02:52 two topics 13:04:10 and btw gerrit is quite unstable for now 13:05:08 #topic Ceilometer resources 13:05:25 Ceilometer api and client was retired https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522183/ 13:05:58 Now about our Ceilometer client, Any suggestion on how we deprecate a client plugin? 13:07:09 we don't have any ceilometer resources. it's just threshold alarm(AodhAlarm) resource can't be used and cloudwatch without the ceiloemeter api 13:07:50 ricolin: we can probably leave the plugin around and remove it next cycle 13:08:05 I mean the client plugin 13:08:11 yeah, that part that I'm also wondering maybe we should directly hidden Alarm resource instead of deprecate it? 13:08:23 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517189/ 13:09:08 we can hide it, but if we want to follow the standard process then... 13:10:39 ramishra, yeah, I would hope to go for a standard way, but meanwhile it will be a broken deprecated resource right? 13:12:35 yeah, it would break, but I think people can possibly run older ceilometer with heat and get away, I don't know 13:12:54 ramishra, right, that's a fair point 13:14:37 ramishra, So about cloudwatch, deprecate it first as well? 13:15:12 It's not already? 13:15:42 ricolin: I'm not sure if anyone uses it or it works. I mean the service is deprecated already. I'm fine to just remove it, unless there is any reason 13:16:15 therve, I through it still there 13:16:27 s/through/thought 13:16:52 but anyway, I think we all agree to just remove it out if it is still there:) 13:17:34 I mean I thought it was deprecated already 13:19:13 therve, you're right, I forgot about that 13:19:33 so in action we will deprecate alarm resources 13:19:43 remove cloudwatch 13:20:06 and remove ceilometer client directly in next cycle 13:20:30 sounds good to all? 13:21:09 let's move on:) 13:21:18 +1 13:21:26 therve, thx 13:22:21 #action we should deprecate Aodh::Alarm resources, remove cloudwatch and remove ceilometer client directly in next cycle 13:22:27 #topic integrationtests https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:ci-test-framework+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:22:39 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:ci-test-framework+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:23:23 I have propose patches for change integration tests 13:23:25 ricolin: do we still want to call the in-tree tests 'integration tests'? functional/regression would probably be better name? 13:24:48 ramishra, sure but any suggestion with just one word? 13:25:08 I don't like to call it in-tree as well:) 13:25:33 I would just call them 'functional' tests 13:25:41 okay 13:25:47 I will change it 13:27:04 I current propose add first two categorize to plugin 13:27:40 and directly use tox to run tests for functional tests as we usually do in heat 13:28:01 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-integration-test-categories 13:28:37 Also I think it would be better to revive(leave the tests in-tree) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521263/ after we've the way to test all tests in-tree 13:29:03 but anyway 13:31:44 ramishra, yeah, you can integrate that with rest patch if you like 13:32:20 I think we can also truncate the config for in-tree tests, but that can probably be done later 13:32:43 I think it's good idea 13:34:00 As we expect those to be only used for gate testing, we can possibly do whatever changes we want 13:34:19 ramishra, yeah 13:34:45 Let's land and settle down current tests so other patch can go on 13:35:14 like on multinode grenda job patch is currently block by this 13:35:55 s/grenda/grenade/ 13:36:09 why? I think genade jobs should only use tests from heat-tempest-plugin 13:37:06 ramishra, oh, I mean block by when we try to decide where tests should locale at 13:37:24 use tests from plugin +1 13:38:29 #action please help to review https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:ci-test-framework+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:39:14 It will be better if we can done this this week 13:39:36 so it will catch up with interop team's plan 13:39:51 Anyway, will see 13:40:11 #topic Open discussion 13:40:26 Any to discuss?:) 13:41:12 Nothing from me :) 13:41:34 kiennt26, thx 13:41:37 kazsh, how's heat-dashboard:) 13:42:01 ricolin: I suggested to just change the flavor used in test_server_signal_userdata_format_software_config, that would reduce the failure rate I think 13:42:28 ramishra, I agree with you on that 13:42:43 so raw only fail two times this week 13:42:50 ricolin: going well :) 13:43:09 but 25 times for test_server_signal_userdata_format_software_config, 13:43:34 kazsh, cool!:) 13:44:13 And after few recheck I think it's fine to land fedora 27 image changes 13:45:25 if that's all, I think we can end the meeting, now:) 13:46:05 +1 13:46:08 thx all:) 13:46:12 #endmeeting