15:00:18 #startmeeting heat 15:00:19 Meeting started Wed Sep 20 15:00:18 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ricolin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:19 #topic roll call 15:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:22 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 15:00:52 hi o/ 15:01:12 o/ 15:01:15 o/ 15:01:18 hello everyone 15:01:30 hi 15:01:35 zaneb, how's your little girl doing:) 15:01:49 ricolin: she's doing great, thank you! 15:02:13 #topic adding items to agenda 15:02:24 zaneb, cool! 15:02:31 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282017-09-20_1500_UTC.29 15:03:12 hello 15:03:54 gaborm, hi! 15:03:56 #topic PTG recap https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-queens-ptg 15:04:35 So we have some discussion cross PTG including try to make some goal for Queens 15:05:21 With in each topics, we set up some goal/actions to do 15:06:08 And put targets in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-queens-ptg-conti-for-topics 15:06:17 Did the separate repo for tempest plugin still in the final list of goals for queens? 15:06:57 yes, at least for me and therve 15:07:56 But please help on put more inputs in etherpads:) 15:09:06 ricolin: I mean I wanted to avoid it till we're forced to do it;) 15:09:44 ramishra, why?:) 15:10:45 ricolon: I'm pesonally not convinced with the benefits vs effort 15:13:14 it's agreed as a community goal now, so we probably have to do it anyway 15:14:17 ramishra, I guess we can try to make it easier as we can, like not separate functional tests out? 15:15:50 We can separate common lib in integration test and scenario to now plugin 15:16:12 ricolin: I've not thought about it in detail, but yeah keeping the tests in heat repo would be simpler I suppose 15:17:51 because the plugin repo would be branchless I suppose 15:18:18 and more light weight for others who try to use it 15:19:11 anyway, we can move to the next item 15:19:51 ramishra, cool, anyway please help to put inputs in as that's just few people 15:20:04 's discussion, and we need more:) 15:20:12 #topic Move Meeting schedule 15:20:44 ricolin: I had added a topic about cloudwatch 15:21:01 ramishra, okay 15:21:17 may be we can discuss that after this 15:21:22 so this one is about suggest we reschedule our meeting time 15:21:30 ramishra, NP!:) 15:22:05 Maybe like two hour earlier? 15:22:24 yeah if that works for people in the US:) 15:22:29 two hours earlier would be 9am for me, so that's no problem from my perspective 15:22:53 although daylight savings will end on Nov 5th, and after that it will be 8am 15:23:30 which is earlier than I prefer but at least this isn't a video meeting ;) 15:24:01 do we have any other US-based regular contributors? 15:24:05 zaneb, or maybe one hour? 15:24:13 nope:) 15:24:15 it seems that the center of gravity has shifted East again :) 15:24:31 zaneb, you're alone:)LoL 15:24:50 1 hr is great, 2hrs is OK 15:25:13 +1 one or two hours earlier, both is great with me 15:25:19 1 hr should be fine, much better than the current time. 15:25:27 +1, from 0am Thu to 11pm Wed :) 15:25:44 ramishra, any idea?:) 15:26:18 kazsh: I admire your commitment :) 15:26:33 2 hrs is better for me, but 1 is still better than now 15:26:34 * zaneb did a lot of 10pm meetings while living in Europe 15:27:08 zaneb: ;) 15:27:15 zaneb, will 1 and half better for you?:) 15:27:21 ricolin: let's go 2hrs earlier 15:28:11 Also as it's allowed right now, shall we move to use #heat for meeting? 15:28:13 most contributors are in asia, we should organise around y'all 15:28:18 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485117/ 15:29:20 we are getting zero benefit from being in the meeting channel as long as it's #openstack-meeting-5 15:29:42 zaneb, let's try -2hrs and see if that works for all 15:30:23 zaneb, yeah, still same group of people from #heat 15:31:17 if we can get #openstack-meeting or #openstack-meeting-alt at that time then maybe worth it, otherwise move to #heat imho 15:31:46 Also we don't have much going on in #heat most of the time, so we should be ok there too;) 15:32:13 zaneb, question for you #openstack-meeting > #heat? 15:33:14 ricolin: I don't really care either way 15:33:40 in principle it's nice to be able to ping people who are in the meeting channel, but how often do we actually do that? 15:34:03 zaneb, like zero:) 15:34:12 So 15:34:19 #heat it is then ;) 15:34:32 We will try to move two hour and host in #heat 15:34:39 start from Next one 15:34:43 Done:) 15:35:01 I mean Two hour earlier 15:35:08 #topic Removing CloudWatch service completely 15:35:38 ramishra, ^^^ 15:35:46 how is this thing still allive? 15:35:54 I was thinking of removing everything about cloudwatch from heat 15:35:55 *alive 15:36:10 ramishra: do it 15:36:11 Does anyone see/have any issues with it 15:36:15 ? 15:36:39 Maybe remove it from puppet/tripleo first 15:36:54 therve: yeah I was thinking about deployment tools 15:37:01 and the impact there 15:37:10 ramishra: iiuc it doesn't actually work with multiple heat engines does it? I can't imagine that anybody is still relying on it 15:38:04 zaneb: yeah no one probably uses it, but I've seen some issues when they tried to remove it from TripleO 15:38:05 we should send out a ML first and ask tripleO to remove it if they still using it 15:38:29 But those are due to what we do in heat 15:39:45 yeah, I'll probably start a ML thread to see if any other project see any issues 15:41:06 ramishra, +1 we can give others few milestones and remove it:) 15:42:29 ricolin: it's actually a defunct service, I am worried about deployment tools (probably there would be no impact though) and not the users of it 15:43:36 but yeah, we can take the full cycle to do it:) 15:44:33 sounds great to me:) 15:45:53 ramishra, move on? 15:46:03 ricolin: yep 15:46:06 #topic Open discussion 15:46:17 Anything else?:) 15:46:38 o/ for heat-dashboard 15:47:16 ricolin: I need your review & + 1 to move forward, pleae check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504104/ 15:47:32 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504166/ 15:47:52 there are two change request to make a new project. 15:48:42 and Infra team will not give +2 unless PTL's + 1 15:49:28 so I think there still something short 15:50:13 kazsh, you need to import from other git repo to create this new one 15:50:42 kazsh, or maybe I missing something in patch 15:51:19 ricolin: regarding that adopt-related bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1700744) I believe I spotted the bug, wish I had time for doing a fix... 15:51:20 Launchpad bug 1700744 in OpenStack Heat "Stack adopt does not work for nested stacks on command line" [Medium,Triaged] 15:51:56 ricolin: yea I will keep git logs as we discussed but beforehand just preparing a new repo by following up https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html 15:52:42 ricolin: Could you abandon the follow patch for me? Due to some very dumb troubles with config, I'm unable to abandon it now :( 15:52:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475364 15:53:10 kazsh, see here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416244/3 15:53:20 kiennt, sure:) 15:53:32 ricolin: thank you :) 15:54:23 gaborm, I can help to give it a test 15:54:33 ricolin: Thank you, that looks almost same as what I'm doing :) 15:54:39 gaborm, I think it's a bug too 15:54:51 ricolin: that would be great, thanks a lot in advance :) 15:55:24 kazsh, did your patch contain git repo link? 15:55:36 ricolin: ah gotcha 15:55:59 you mean.. upstream: https://github.com/xxxxx ? right ? 15:56:11 kazsh, yeah:) 15:56:39 kazsh, it needs to know where it can folk from 15:56:54 ricolin: very helpful, thanks a lot mate :) will update this change tomorrow & get back to you soon! 15:57:36 kazsh, cool! 15:57:53 3mins left 15:57:57 Anything else? 15:58:17 Anyone would like to give a Forum topic Brainstorming?:) 16:01:04 Okay thanks all for join meeting today, please provide your inputs to PTG etherpads and notice that we move to 13:00 UTC at #heat next time. I will make ML out 16:01:09 #endmeeting