15:00:53 #startmeeting heat 15:00:54 Meeting started Wed Apr 12 15:00:53 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ricolin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:59 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 15:01:03 #topic roll call 15:01:35 hi 15:01:42 hi:) 15:01:43 o/ 15:01:50 hello 15:01:52 o/ 15:02:58 #topic adding items to agenda 15:02:59 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282017-04-12_1500_UTC.29 15:04:33 okey first topic! 15:04:35 #topic Announcement 15:04:57 so we have release heat pike-1! 15:05:01 yeah! 15:05:15 ricolin: great 15:05:25 all looks clean 15:05:38 also will release python-heatclient 1.9.0 15:05:59 I was hoping to land the translation patches before that but anyway it does not matter 15:06:09 and heat-agents from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1 15:06:21 yeah, me to 15:06:33 will get it landed as soon as we can :) 15:06:37 reg heat-agents, we did a release just a few days back right? do we need one more? 15:07:50 there actually only increase one commit between, so I'm free to release or not:) 15:08:10 that's why I only jump from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1 15:08:24 what guys think about it? 15:08:29 Sorry I have to leave, next time we should speak about non floating IP providers ;) 15:08:44 pilgrimstack1 15:08:47 pilgrimstack1 ok 15:09:04 pilgrimstack1 ok I will help to add to agenda next week:) 15:09:25 This was on 5th April https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452986/ 15:10:03 So not sure if we want one more now 15:10:25 sure, then I can abandon this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455876/ 15:11:13 ramishra abandoned:) 15:11:22 ricolin: :) 15:11:27 how about python-heatclient? 15:11:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455873/ 15:12:20 I think that one was not done after ocata, so should be ok I think 15:12:45 ramishra thx:) 15:13:20 Also I have send goals response to release 15:13:25 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455121/ 15:13:39 s/release/governance/ 15:14:07 ricolin: yeah, I have seen that 15:14:08 would like guys can help to review and correct any mistake before it merged 15:15:04 does it mention about the py35 dsvm job? 15:15:17 I think so 15:15:31 but anyway, it's just to agree that we're doing it this cycle 15:15:36 I can update more words if it's not clear 15:15:58 ramishra yeah:) 15:16:26 so on top of that 15:16:28 #topic py35 gate jobs 15:16:53 So it seems to green most of the time, I've not seen many failures 15:17:08 I've the project-config patch ready to make it voting 15:17:13 I think it's all green 15:17:20 but there are few things to consider 15:17:40 like what?:) 15:17:45 1. We've disabled swift related tests 15:17:59 yes 15:18:11 2. There are some infra changes planned in this and next week 15:18:27 So may be we wait for some more time before enabling it 15:18:40 but If we all agree I can push that change though 15:18:47 oh, I see what you talking about now 15:18:55 agree with you 15:19:11 also can you share your patch about voting? 15:19:28 I've not pushed it yet:) 15:19:35 okey:) 15:19:51 Let me do that with WIP 15:20:06 just like to make sure we do that with your patch 15:20:16 ok:) 15:20:54 #action ramishra will send the voting patch for heat py35 test later 15:21:31 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456253/1 15:21:37 done:) 15:21:55 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456253 15:21:59 nice:) 15:22:06 also I would like to propose about adding py35 job for python heat client and heat cfntools 15:22:39 I already have patch wip, but would like to know what guys think about it 15:22:46 before I send it out 15:23:44 we already have gate-python-heatclient-python35? 15:24:04 right I mean heat-agents:) 15:25:19 I think therve wanted to land https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425057/ before adding the py35 job for heat-agents 15:25:26 Thomas already have some py35 fix (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425057/) 15:25:45 So that we can simply add a voting job 15:26:01 Yeah steve wasn't super nice 15:26:11 yeah, I'm totally +1 with that:) 15:26:17 lol 15:26:19 Blocking my patch and not proposing the project-config patch is not cool 15:27:00 that's why I would like to make it a team's call to make it land first or not:) 15:27:29 I'll check with stevebaker tomorrow morning if he can unblock it then:) 15:27:44 ramishra thx 15:29:19 okey 15:29:23 #topic Open discussion 15:30:15 therve ramishra I would like to know is this the basic define test we talk about in PTG? 15:30:19 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454222/ 15:30:41 ricolin, What does "define test" mean? 15:31:38 therve we have agree about to give out a test list for refstack team for define if the environment contain `heat service` 15:32:02 in the list we agree about basic api tests (which rabit implemented) 15:32:44 and a basic sceniro test which use the basic core services(nova, cinder, neutron, etc) 15:34:05 so I write that test for team to make sure if that's what we talking about 15:35:30 as long as we can running all those test well in tempest command, I think refstack team is okey with it 15:36:17 guys, any idea? 15:36:27 I don't care 15:37:48 okey! 15:38:13 ricolin: I'll check, but I'm not very clear about the refstack team expectations 15:38:57 I think it's about to let them have something to propose to TC about making heat a core project 15:39:34 they actually don't might with the detail of tests as long as it's okey by heat 15:40:34 Any other topic to discuss this week?:) 15:42:26 I think we can end the meeting if no other topic this week:) 15:43:02 +1 15:43:08 thanks all:) 15:43:10 #endmeeting