08:00:06 #startmeeting heat 08:00:07 Meeting started Wed Aug 24 08:00:06 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ramishra. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:00:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 08:00:20 #topic roll call 08:00:24 o/ 08:01:39 hi all 08:02:09 0/ 08:02:11 o/ 08:03:14 hi 08:03:18 ok let's move on we can finish this quickly and get on with the reviews;) 08:03:28 #topic Adding items to agenda 08:03:39 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282016-08-24_0800_UTC.29 08:05:16 anything else we want to discuss? else it's all about the n3-status. 08:05:23 #topic n3-status 08:05:32 #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/newton-3 08:06:02 ramishra: when do we plan release n3 ? 08:06:09 at the end of this week? 08:06:10 next week I assume 08:06:17 I know, that there is document with high priority reviews, that should be landed in n-3 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-newton-reviews 08:06:30 Oh. then it's ok, because we plan to review more patches during this week 08:06:48 hi! 08:06:50 https://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html 08:07:14 this says Aug29-02 08:07:29 prazumovsky , ramishra: I suppose, that we may move it out from the n3 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/get-reality-for-resources . am I right? 08:07:47 yeah and lbaas-l7-rules-support too 08:07:51 ramishra: ok, middle of the next week sounds ok 08:08:08 it seems it's stuck with some neutron patches yet to merge 08:08:16 Think, you're right, but nova and cinder resources prefer to land to n-3 08:08:17 ramishra: yeah, AFAIk it is blocked by some changes in lbaas project 08:08:32 prazumovsky: I beleive we may land them without BP 08:08:45 just want to be sure, that it's not blocker for n3 08:09:05 No problems 08:09:21 I'd really like this to land so I can do the downstream packaging https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/tempest-plugin-support 08:09:24 yeah, I agree we can land them as they get reviewed, there are too many patches to get in before next week:) 08:10:00 I think the other bps should land before next week including the tempest plugin 08:10:12 stevebaker: I assume there is one left in the series, right? 08:10:18 2? 08:10:22 k 08:10:31 stevebaker: we will take a look it ;) 08:10:33 oh, 1. sweet 08:10:44 coul you please share the link ? 08:10:48 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349741/ 08:10:48 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/support-conditions-function+status:open I hope these patches merged before n3:) 08:10:50 stevebaker: ^ 08:10:52 stevebaker: I checked it this morning;) 08:11:22 yes, lets get support-conditions-function in too 08:11:38 stevebaker: phew.. removed 200 lines ;) it looks like easy job for review. 08:11:50 stevebaker, thanks:) 08:11:52 thats the kind we like 08:11:55 I think rest of the bps are exected to be reviewed in time to land. 08:12:12 I haven't looked into why the gate fails so often, but its been real bad 08:12:37 stevebaker: there are 2/3 known issues. 08:12:45 ramishra: looks like this is completed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/convergence-migrate-stack ? 08:12:56 yep landed this morning. 08:13:19 it suffer in gate for hole week 08:13:20 unfortunately ochyprikov in vacation, so could you update it ? 08:13:41 ricolin: one patch ? :) 08:13:45 awful 08:14:32 ya, one patch 08:15:13 that sql command out of sync issue is the major reason and there is autoscaling/loadbalancer issue I've seen frequently in the last few days. 08:15:30 ramishra: I see ,that also half work was done for merging envs BP 08:15:37 other than these two I've not seen anything that needs investigation though. 08:15:48 I supose, that you expected, that it be merged too, right? 08:16:10 yes, it would be, I would push shardy for review tomorrow. 08:16:18 merge it all! 08:17:02 stevebaker: lol 08:17:05 yes:) 08:17:37 stevebaker: need mobile app with one button: "Merge them all" ! :) 08:17:52 We've some convergence patches that need to land too. 08:18:24 Else, we would have to remove from default. 08:18:28 ramishra: do they mentioned in bugs? 08:18:34 keep the etherpad up to date if you want it reviewed https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-newton-reviews 08:18:59 I assume that can land after FF as I don't see any bp for that, they are all bugs 08:19:03 ramishra: could we add section to etherpad about these patches ? 08:19:33 like "should be merged for converge" - otherwise disable convergence by default 08:19:51 yes I'll add them 08:20:06 yeah, we can push bugs off to make way for feature reviews 08:20:47 zaneb is reviewing those patches and conditions patches for them to land before next week. 08:21:20 so we seem in good shape:) 08:21:54 #topic Design summit spaces ? 08:22:05 it's mine 08:22:26 I just saw several mail about discussion of Design summit topics 08:22:47 so decided to ask: did we get request about spaces ? 08:23:09 probably this question for therve 08:23:17 therve would have got the mail, can anyone else respond? 08:23:17 maybe therve did by he is away. As usual this is a question for the new PTL which we don't have yet 08:23:18 but may be somebody knows 08:23:44 stevebaker: oh. true. 08:23:55 the last allocations seemed fine, and there is less space this time so lets just ask for proportionally less 08:24:14 stevebaker: +1 08:24:36 4+8 was last time right? 08:24:39 just need to ping ttx or somebody else, who is responsiable for it 08:24:59 4 fishbowls and 8 work sessions. 08:25:06 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Newton/Etherpads#Heat 08:25:34 and half day meet-up of course :) 08:25:48 yeah, we may ask for the same and see what we get. 08:26:20 not sure if therve had done this yet. 08:26:38 I do wonder if we're struggling to fill all those slots with meaningful topics 08:26:40 skraynev: would you be able to update ttx about it informally 08:27:02 ramishra: yeah. I will try to ping him today 08:27:03 also care the dependance with other teams 08:27:28 stevebaker: yeah, I also thought about the same, without topics do we know how many we need? 08:27:35 stevebaker: good question. unfortunately we have not answer yet :) 08:28:02 easy is ask for the same as last time;) 08:28:19 its an inversion of what we need to do, PTL first, then topics, then slots 08:28:29 ramishra: based on previous experience we may do brain storm and generate a lot of topics 08:28:36 stevebaker: +1 08:29:00 but I realise we can't do it that way, so lets make the best of it 08:29:26 maybe we can start to collect slots first? 08:29:48 I mean "topics" 08:30:04 stevebaker: I can ask ttx, about end of time for submitting final number of topics. 08:30:18 and we will use this time for investigation 08:30:48 yeah, I'm sure we could give up slots that we don't need and they will be useful to someone - lets just ask for the same as last time 08:30:59 ok 08:32:25 may be add the topics to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-heat 08:33:19 ramishra: +1 08:33:28 #topic open discussion 08:33:46 anything we want to discuss? 08:34:06 I realise everyone is snowed with feature freeze reviews, but... 08:34:48 I've got this series in heat-templates, and once it lands I can do downstream packaging to make it way easier to install the heat agent projects for software deployments https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/heat-templates+branch:master+topic:centos-rdo-boot-config 08:35:33 stevebaker: will look at them this week 08:36:04 ramishra: thanks, this packaging could be used for the agent container too 08:36:28 yep:) 08:37:04 that is all I have 08:37:32 So should we go back to revewing stuff now? 08:37:43 back to #heat 08:37:49 sure 08:37:55 night all 08:38:19 ok then. 08:38:26 #endmeeting