07:00:04 <skraynev> #startmeeting Heat
07:00:05 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Mar  2 07:00:04 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is skraynev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
07:00:06 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
07:00:08 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'heat'
07:00:57 <shardy> o/
07:01:03 <ochuprykov> hi
07:01:08 <KanagarajM> hi
07:01:09 <ricolin> o/
07:01:11 <tiantian> o/
07:01:38 <skraynev> hi folks :)
07:02:45 <skraynev> #topic Adding items to agenda
07:02:51 <skraynev> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282016-03-02_0700_UTC.29
07:03:45 <skraynev> any suggestions?
07:05:17 <skraynev> ok.
07:05:57 <skraynev> #topic heatclient 1.0.0 release
07:06:16 <skraynev> According this etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient
07:06:37 <skraynev> there are three patches, that will be good to merge. So please review them.
07:07:08 <skraynev> I plan to post 1.0.0 release tag, when all these patches are landed
07:07:27 <skraynev> shardy KanagarajM ricolin tiantian ^
07:07:50 <tiantian> sure, will have a look:)
07:07:51 <ricolin> on it
07:08:48 <KanagarajM> morning i have looked at +2 most of them.
07:09:05 <pas-ha> o/
07:09:08 <skraynev> Yeah. I have seen ;)
07:09:22 <skraynev> pas-ha: welcome ;) nice to see you
07:09:37 <skraynev> #topic M3 status
07:10:23 <ricolin> 16 hours to go
07:11:34 <skraynev> after looking on status for patches https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/sfc-heat
07:11:51 <shardy> https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1539069 looks like it should probably be marked as not affecting heat instead of wont fix?
07:11:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1539069 in Aodh "CeilometerAlarmTest is failing intermittently" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Julien Danjou (jdanjou)
07:12:07 <shardy> it's a bit confusing saying we won't fix an issue with our own tests ;)
07:12:50 <ricolin> +1
07:13:05 <ramishra> hi all
07:13:07 <skraynev> I think, that it's very risky to wait this BP. Also LBaAS v2 mostly is merged, but I'd like to see release notes for it plus functional test. So I think it may some kind of FFE, because the main part of code is merged
07:13:28 <skraynev> shardy: ok. could you please set the coirrect status?
07:13:32 <skraynev> *correct
07:13:50 <skraynev> I had a doubts when set it.
07:13:58 <skraynev> ramishra: hi.
07:14:00 <shardy> skraynev: sure, done!
07:14:07 <skraynev> shardy: thx ;)
07:14:12 <ramishra> sorry I'm little late
07:17:14 <skraynev> ramishra: np. you did not miss something important
07:17:28 <shardy> There are a lot of triaged/confirmed bugs which are medium, I guess we can start bumping those not in-progress to RC1?
07:17:56 <skraynev> shardy: yeah. You read my thoughts :)
07:18:16 <skraynev> I wanted to ask; is it ok to move the not Inprogress bugs to Rc1
07:18:42 <skraynev> and also other In Progress ,which is not merged till todays evening
07:19:09 <ramishra> skraynev: for sfc-heat, I don't see a spec, is the bp approved? Did we agree to introduce new resource plugins using spec-lite rather than full spec?
07:19:49 <ramishra> or no spec;)
07:20:17 <skraynev> ramishra: it has not spec in Heat, Mohankumar told, that he did not do it, because he Mentioned neutron spec.
07:20:46 <skraynev> I asked him to do it, but I am not sure, what he decided about it
07:20:53 <shardy> skraynev: we need to evaluate each of the high in-progress bugs to check which are important enough to block m3 on, then bump everything else to RC1
07:21:34 <shardy> we've got 46 not-landed bugs, so we'll have to bump a lot of them I think ;)
07:22:05 <stevebaker> hi, sorry I'm late
07:22:12 <shardy> hey stevebaker
07:23:07 <skraynev> stevebaker: hey. we already discussed heatclient. there are 3 patches on review with one +2. and I think, when they be merged I will propose 1.0.0
07:23:16 <skraynev> shardy: agree.
07:23:58 <stevebaker> skraynev: releasing on those 3 sounds good
07:25:17 <stevebaker> reviews on the High bugs in m-3 would be good
07:28:35 <skraynev> stevebaker: shardy: I have moved most part of bugs to rc1
07:28:45 <skraynev> fuh... not it looks better ;)
07:29:17 <stevebaker> heh, its not so bad ;)
07:29:38 <shardy> heh, nice :)
07:30:56 <ricolin> cheers!
07:31:53 <ramishra> what about some convergence High bugs, can we not move them to RC1 too or we want them to be fixed in m3? some have patches  with merge conflicts.
07:31:55 <skraynev> I think, that we have time before the todays evening , i.e. Wed 17.00 UTC
07:32:11 <skraynev> I think, that I will propose m3 near of this time
07:33:14 <skraynev> ramishra: if patches are in merge conflict - then we need to move to rc1, because imo it may take more time for fixing/re-review/merging
07:33:31 <skraynev> ramishra: could you please move such bugs?
07:34:45 <tiantian> https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1533074 about this bug, only need to approve the patch for backport to liberty
07:34:46 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1533074 in heat "Can't create nova server with subnet and fixed_ip" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to huangtianhua (huangtianhua)
07:36:26 <tiantian> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274307/
07:36:37 <ramishra> shardy: can we move this https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1528958 to RC1?
07:36:38 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1528958 in heat "SoftwareDeployments -> SoftwareDeploymentGroup update is destructive" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Rico Lin (rico-lin)
07:36:43 <skraynev> tiantian: hm.. IMO it should be Fix released already. if it's merged in master
07:37:24 <shardy> ramishra: Yes, although I'd like to see it fixed before we cut the RC if possible
07:37:31 <shardy> IIRC ricolin has a patch up already
07:38:04 <skraynev> tiantian: +A, also I have updated status for bug. thx
07:38:05 <ricolin> true
07:38:20 <shardy> without that it's impossible to move away from the deprecated SoftwareDeployments name, and I'd like to change all the names in the tripleo-heat-templates to non-deprecated ones
07:38:58 <skraynev> ramishra: let's try to review it during today
07:39:15 <ricolin> skraynev: there is actually four patchs need to be merge in OSC bp
07:40:01 <skraynev> ricolin: hm... I am not sure, because the main patches are mentioned here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient
07:40:53 <ricolin> check the end of that file:)
07:41:15 <ricolin> openstack orchestration service list : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285909/
07:41:26 <ricolin> four!
07:41:53 <ricolin> :)
07:44:17 <skraynev> ricolin: lol. it's bonus
07:44:35 <skraynev> why is it at the end of list ?!
07:44:48 <skraynev> #topic Open discussion
07:44:49 <stevebaker> ricolin: its done, anything else now is a bonus
07:45:02 <ricolin> lol
07:47:54 <skraynev> So plan to bump m3 todays or tomorrow early morning (depends on rate of review in releases repo)
07:47:58 <skraynev> same for 1.0.0
07:48:38 <stevebaker> +1
07:48:47 <ricolin> +1:)
07:48:52 <skraynev> if you have any suggestions/questions, please do it now or to be silent forever ;)
07:50:16 <shardy> +1
07:52:22 <skraynev> nice.
07:53:04 <skraynev> if we have not something else ,I suggest to finish and go to review remains patches ;)
07:53:34 <shardy> +1
07:53:46 <ricolin> +1!
07:54:29 <skraynev> ok ;)
07:54:33 <skraynev> #endmeeting