07:00:38 #startmeeting heat 07:00:39 Meeting started Wed Feb 17 07:00:38 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is skraynev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 07:00:40 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 07:00:43 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 07:00:53 #topic rollcall 07:01:09 \o 07:01:20 o/ 07:01:21 ramishra, shardy 07:01:36 jdob 07:01:38 o/ 07:01:57 neelashah: ping 07:03:09 #topic Adding items to agenda 07:03:22 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282016-02-17_0700_UTC.29 07:03:38 skraynev: heat osc commands? 07:04:03 stevebaker: do you have updates ? 07:04:25 skraynev: yep 07:04:31 stevebaker: ok. added 07:04:49 hi 07:05:11 ramishra: hi 07:05:24 ok. we can start 07:05:42 #topic Spec-lite review request 07:05:55 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1545857 07:05:55 Launchpad bug 1545857 in heat "Add a heat.type constraint" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Jay Dobies (jdob) 07:06:11 our first spec-lite? 07:06:21 I think about moving it to heat-next and landing in N 07:06:24 stevebaker: yeah :) 07:06:50 a new constraint is fairly low risk though if he can land it for m 07:07:15 +1 07:07:47 I (ahem) may be writing my own spec-lite for M tomorrow 07:08:02 lol 07:08:16 just a tiny little feature 07:08:25 I have not enough time for reviewing all of it ;) 07:09:26 btw, can we get the spec-lite contrib guidelines in too;) reviews appreciated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271177/ 07:09:30 stevebaker; k. let's try. I think, that I may reduce some uncomplete bugs on the next meeting 07:10:04 stevebaker: the another interesting question: can we merge spec-lite after FF ? 07:10:13 ramishra: ^ 07:10:55 skraynev: you mean the feature itself? I'd assume feature freeze rules would apply 07:12:06 stevebaker: yes. it's a bit confusing, that launchpad will show this as a bug, not BP 07:13:30 stevebaker: but I think, that we can deal with it ;) 07:13:38 skraynev: it would be of importance wishlist. IMO we should handle it like a feature with FF. 07:13:51 skraynev: though we can check with glance team how they are doing it. 07:13:52 I guess as soon as we hit ff the spec-lite bugs get kicked to the next milestone 07:14:02 unless they have a ffe 07:14:19 ramishra: stevebaker: kk 07:14:47 stevebaker: do I need ping someone about potential ffe ? 07:15:09 I think its basically up to us these days 07:15:15 us==PTL 07:15:57 heh. ok 07:17:00 #topic LBaaS v2 support in Heat 07:17:10 so it's a good candidate for ffe 07:17:39 I think most of codes for LBaaS v2 are submitted. 07:17:49 Waiting for more reviews. 07:18:00 agreed, its self contained, being actively reviewed 07:18:04 i tested the lbaasv2 and basic things work with the changes i suggested 07:18:10 elynn: yes, but I still wait +1 from Jenkins without -1 from reviewers 07:18:27 ananta: cool. thank you 07:18:44 That's great. 07:19:07 update priority to High 07:19:27 Just make sure this feature can be merged in m-3 :) 07:19:59 Thanks skraynev :) 07:20:28 skraynev: I am following up 07:20:45 #topic OSC commands 07:21:08 stevebaker: it's your show time :) 07:21:26 only 5 commands need to land, but I've been writing some enhancement changes too https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient 07:21:59 stevebaker: I have seen that more then 50 % merged, but I spent a lot of time for reviewing merged patches (to understand how it should looks like) 07:22:17 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient 07:22:32 so stuff is happening, but there is only a week to go 07:22:57 I finally started the "stack failures list" command https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280963/ 07:23:05 will finish the unit tests tomorrow 07:23:10 stevebaker: more over, I think about updating output-show and output list with supporting new API too 07:24:02 skraynev: +1, although if it doesn't change the UI that could be a stable-backportable bug fix 07:25:04 stevebaker: yeah. it's already work for old cli, but we need to use the same approach for osc methods 07:25:26 stevebaker: do you want to land "stack failures list" before 1.0.0 ? 07:25:38 I'd like to 07:25:58 ok. just wanted to clarify 07:26:29 I've got nothing else on this topic, unless someone else has 07:27:47 nothing from my side :) it looks like a really awesome works was done and we need to finish it and then drink a beer 07:28:01 I know, I'm amazed 07:29:01 #topic amazing stevebaker ;) 07:29:05 oops 07:29:17 hur 07:29:22 #topic M3 status 07:29:41 #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/mitaka-3 07:30:12 so we have a big numbers of BP 07:30:20 and also a lot of bugs for m3 07:30:41 I think, that we should finish BP first of all and then focus on bugs during preparing for rc1 07:31:35 elyn: what's about senlin resources? 07:31:48 most codes are submitted 07:31:49 I have seen two new on review + constraints 07:32:10 No more resources needed to add. 07:32:10 do you plan to add more resources ? 07:32:34 But I will add some templates to heat-templates later. 07:32:41 elynn: it's ok 07:33:45 please make sure, that it will land during this and next week 07:34:17 I will also ping personally all BP assignee and ask status. 07:35:06 update restrict functional tests have a dependency on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248676/, but it seems to be stuck with unrelated gate failures(number of rechecks) 07:36:04 ramishra: is't failures related with changes? 07:36:14 skraynev: nope 07:36:40 unexpected API error... 07:36:52 I'll try one more time 07:36:55 I have seen such error early 07:37:08 ramishra: yeah. please do it 07:38:24 ramishra: also it looks like good tome to ping shardy and anant to look on other patches 07:38:37 related with restrict update for convergence case 07:38:40 some patches seem to be going through a cycle of errors at times;) 07:38:44 and functional tests 07:39:02 ramishra: yeah. I know. 07:39:04 btw... 07:39:13 yeah will do that today. Expecting to get it approved today. 07:39:16 :) 07:39:57 stevebaker: ramishra: elynn: please review this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280129/ 07:40:13 sure 07:40:16 it's one of frequently error on the gate 07:40:32 will do 07:40:41 we discussed it with therve and it loks like should fix one of blockers and makes gate more stable 07:40:46 thx guys 07:42:15 #topic Open discussion 07:43:56 do we have anything else for discussion? 07:44:21 * ricolin come here very late 07:44:34 if no, let's try to review all High priority patches ;) 07:44:51 :) 07:44:57 ricolin: no. you come at the best moment 07:45:16 review!!:) 07:45:16 moment, when I can say: please review high priority patches ;) 07:45:21 yes ;) 07:45:30 ricolin: this one https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/mitaka-3 07:45:37 on it 07:45:54 or try to focus on lbaas or osc https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient 07:46:11 ricolin: great. we need your +2 ;) 07:46:20 and -1 too :) 07:46:34 and please help to review this 07:46:35 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252201/ 07:47:31 tempest team still waiting for this patch to get merge before they put their patch 07:47:41 so we're waiting for each otehr 07:48:47 ricolin: Oh I remember this one. I will take i a look 07:49:14 let's continue in #heat 07:49:29 thanks everyone 07:49:36 #endmeeting