09:33:10 #startmeeting ha 09:33:11 Meeting started Mon Aug 29 09:33:10 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is aspiers. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:33:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:33:15 The meeting name has been set to 'ha' 09:33:15 hi 09:33:22 hi 09:33:31 samP: so welcome back :) 09:33:40 sorry for the absent 09:33:44 no problem 09:34:07 I have been away a lot recently too 09:34:35 hi 09:34:47 #topic Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) 09:35:13 My status: starting two weeks vacation today, I'll not attend next meeting ;) 09:35:18 so I don't have much to report 09:35:21 ddeja: nice :) 09:35:36 I think we should agree what to do about the open spec review 09:35:45 ddeja: have a great vac 09:36:05 does anyone want to report anything before we talk about the spec? 09:36:20 aspiers, samP thanks. Rather then that I was doint internal job 09:36:23 I have to share info from PWG-mid and ops 09:36:36 samP: oh yeah, of course! 09:36:49 aspiers: is it now or later? 09:37:04 please share now 09:37:17 ok then, let me start with PWG-mid-cycle 09:37:24 here is the etherpad 09:37:32 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_Newton_Midcycle 09:37:45 thanks 09:37:57 Pete@suse was there and he was start the topic for VMHA 09:38:15 it start from line 67 in above etherpad 09:38:35 yes, Pete sent that to me 09:39:01 ok then, we have to do five thing before summit 09:39:10 (1) finish the specs 09:39:52 (2) start to contact with related PTLs or persons in other project 09:40:27 (3) engage with nova community with dicussions about scheduler and capabillities 09:40:56 There was discussion about how to test VMHA 09:41:25 This may be a long term issue, but we have discuss this with QA team 09:41:36 agreed 09:42:01 those are the suggestions form PWG team 09:42:24 #info samP and pchadwick attended PWG / ops mid-cycle where VM HA user story was discussed 09:42:54 so my question about specs was whether we should have a draft/ folder 09:43:10 since it seems wrong to merge specs into approved/ when there are still FIXMEs 09:43:58 aspiers: you mean, do we need them to move to other folder to mark them as "done"? 09:44:10 aspiers: I think draft directory woudl be fine 09:44:23 samP: right - I mean initially merge into draft/ and then when they are finished, move to accepted/ 09:44:29 or approved/ 09:44:34 I can't remember which :) 09:45:27 then we can have multiple reviews modifying the same spec, which is better for keeping reviews small and easy to track 09:45:43 if you agree, I can make that change to the current review, and then merge it 09:46:17 +1 09:46:26 +1 ok with me 09:46:30 cool, thanks 09:46:37 I will start another spec this week too 09:46:54 since finally I caught up with vacation backlog and do not have too many other commitments 09:46:55 I think I have add some info to that spec 09:47:22 smt about libvirt events 09:47:36 samP: that would be useful 09:48:11 ok, I will do it. event you merge it, I can submit a new patch for it 09:48:20 yep 09:48:28 ok then. 09:48:32 I added some URLs in my last comment 09:48:36 we can link to those from the spec 09:48:57 I can do that, but if you have more info about events, feel free to share it also 09:49:45 aspiers: I may have some info about events, which events are usefull and why. I will add them 09:49:54 cool 09:50:17 #action aspiers to modify VM monitoring spec so that it goes in draft/, and then merge it 09:50:30 #action samP to provide more info about VM monitoring events 09:50:41 #action aspiers to start another spec 09:50:56 #topic Barcelona 09:51:05 so our talk did not get accepted :-( 09:51:17 it seems that something significantly changed with the process for accepting talks this time 09:51:41 normally SUSE gets 15-20 talks accepted, but this time only ~5 09:51:43 did we submit it on "project updates" track? 09:51:57 yes maybe, I can't remember 09:52:15 aspiers: similar in my team, not many presentation in comparison to Austin 09:52:20 weird 09:52:30 maybe 4 days vs 5 dyas 09:52:33 yeh.. as I remember.. we put it in project updates.. only 10+ talks are accepted 09:52:52 samP: hmm, that was a mistake then I guess :-( 09:53:12 so I cannot guarantee to be in Barcelona, but there is still a good chance I hope 09:53:13 nevertheless, we still have to evangelise people 09:54:05 last week I talked with ptl of Vitrage project, he isreally insterested in colaboration with us 09:54:12 cool 09:54:16 great 09:54:44 so I hope to meet with him in Barcelona 09:54:52 in case anyone is reading the logs of this meeting, the VM monitoring spec is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352217/ 09:55:16 samP: I think you need to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310510/ 09:55:31 proposal for a new maintenance field in nova 09:55:42 aspiers: yes, I will 09:56:16 ok, any other topics? 09:56:17 aspiers: thank for info 09:56:22 samP: welcome :) 09:56:32 aspiers: nothing from my side 09:56:48 ok, so we can close I guess 09:56:56 ddeja: hope you have a great break! 09:57:04 aspiers: thanks :) 09:57:22 samP: I should be around on #openstack-ha this week if we need to discuss specs 09:57:44 aspiers: that would be great.. 09:58:11 ok, thanks guys 09:58:23 see you around :) 09:58:40 ok then, ddeja: have a nice vac 09:58:44 thank you all 09:59:06 bye 09:59:09 #endmeeting