08:03:43 #startmeeting ha 08:03:44 Meeting started Mon May 23 08:03:43 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is aspiers. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:03:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:03:48 The meeting name has been set to 'ha' 08:04:02 OK samP only has 10 minutes but I don't think we need long today anyway 08:04:16 I guess he will join any second 08:04:18 sorry guys 08:04:26 no problem :) 08:04:33 #topic specs and user story 08:04:38 we can keep it very quick 08:04:41 I don't have much to report anyway 08:04:46 since I was too busy last week 08:04:56 but today I plan to fully review the user story and start writing specs 08:05:13 I think the nova-specs template should be fine 08:05:28 #link https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/newton/template.html can be reused for writing our specs 08:05:32 have you attend to VoIP meeting morning? 08:05:47 I was on sick leave last two weeks so I didn't do much, unfortunately 08:05:51 with PWG team? 08:05:55 ddeja: sorry to hear that 08:06:05 samP_: I thought PWG meeting was tonight? 08:06:14 ah.. ok 08:06:51 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/product-team is the PWG meetings details 08:07:12 there is 10 minutes allocated for the HA VM user story 08:07:28 this week I'll mostly be focused on Mistral, since Renat asked me to cover the problem of ACK after message is processed 08:07:29 so I will try to make sure they have up to date info 08:07:42 aspiers: cool 08:07:51 samP_: did you start writing any specs yet? 08:08:27 I think I will start drafting via etherpad and add links from https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-instance-ha 08:08:46 I start VM monitoring sepc. But I coulnt finish it 08:09:03 samP_: cool, could you provide a link to it? 08:09:14 samP_: or copy/paste into a new etherpad? 08:09:26 e.g. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-instance-ha-vm-monitoring-spec 08:09:33 Sorry, I cant do it now. 08:09:43 samP_: no rush, I mean when you have time :) 08:09:45 I will share it tomorrow. 08:09:49 great, thanks! 08:10:07 ddeja: so you have the host recovery spec assigned to you 08:10:14 aspiers: yup 08:10:17 ddeja: is that still OK? 08:10:22 totaly 08:10:28 great 08:10:44 let's use that nova-specs template 08:10:51 I was also wondering if we should create a blueprint 08:11:01 aspiers: +1 08:11:03 it's not clear to me where blueprints fit into the new workflow 08:11:09 I tried to find docs on that but failed 08:11:15 +1 for use nova spec 08:11:19 from what I understand 08:11:39 usage of blueprints depends on particular projects 08:11:46 yes that was my understanding too 08:12:00 i.e. some projects use blueprints, some use specs, and some use both - right? 08:12:08 yup 08:12:14 nova use both 08:12:30 http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/_sources/kilo.blueprints.txt 08:12:39 but this does not exist for later releases 08:14:08 but that doesn't mean that nova is not using blueprints 08:14:18 true, they are still using them 08:14:22 AFAICS 08:17:31 ah, http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/blueprints.html seems to be the latest 08:17:51 Really sorry guys. I have to leave now. I will check the log when I come back. so, catch you all in openstack-ha. 08:17:55 although nova is a slightly bigger project than ours ;-) 08:18:01 samP_: no problem at all, thanks for joining! 08:18:07 ddeja: get well soon...take care 08:18:15 samP_: thanks! 08:18:24 ok then.. 08:19:00 aspiers: from what I see, nova always have blueprints for new features 08:19:04 and sometimes specs 08:19:09 ddeja: yes it seems so 08:19:29 ddeja: any thoughts on whether we should also use blueprints? 08:19:39 I guess that would be tied to a particular project 08:19:51 which maybe we should avoid for now 08:20:04 since we already discussed moving specs around when we understand their per-project impact better 08:20:21 I guess for now we should just use specs 08:20:22 I am probably over-thinking this though :) 08:20:29 yes that should be fine 08:20:39 nova changes are bigger and more complicated 08:20:40 we can write blueprint if writing a spec started to be too complicated 08:20:51 exactly 08:21:10 OK, cool 08:22:07 do we have anything else on agenda? ;) 08:22:44 I don't think so 08:22:47 :) 08:22:52 #topic AOB 08:23:00 seems noone else is here either 08:23:05 yup 08:23:07 I hope I can join the PWG meeting tonight 08:23:35 I'm pretty sure that I couldn't 08:24:59 OK, well if I do, I can report back, e.g. on #openstack-ha 08:25:06 cool 08:25:17 alright, if there's nothing else shall we close the meeting for today? 08:25:54 I guess so 08:25:58 ok 08:26:06 see you on IRC :) 08:26:11 #endmeeting