14:00:23 <flaper87> #startmeeting Glance Drivers
14:00:24 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Dec 15 14:00:23 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is flaper87. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:26 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'glance_drivers'
14:00:34 <flaper87> Hello folks!
14:00:37 <flaper87> who's around?
14:00:44 <ativelkov> o/
14:01:33 <sigmavirus24> o/
14:02:30 <mfedosin> o/
14:02:41 <flaper87> ativelkov: hey there :D
14:02:42 <flaper87> let's give 2 more mins for ppl to join, otherwise we'll skip the meeting this week
14:02:59 <flaper87> sigmavirus24: mfedosin hey :)
14:03:24 <rosmaita> o/
14:03:33 <flaper87> as of now, I'm the only one from the drivers team here :/
14:03:37 <flaper87> wow, rosmaita HEY !
14:03:39 <flaper87> :D
14:03:41 <flaper87> now we have 2
14:03:42 <rosmaita> hey
14:03:43 <flaper87> :D
14:03:44 <nikhil> o/
14:03:45 <flaper87> w000h0000
14:03:48 <flaper87> and three
14:03:52 <flaper87> yeay, let's start
14:04:01 <ativelkov> 2 is HA. Well, almost :)
14:04:03 <flaper87> #topic changes in nova around glance configuration
14:04:08 <flaper87> no idea who added that
14:04:14 <rosmaita> me
14:04:14 <flaper87> but I guess it was a heads up?
14:04:19 <rosmaita> yes, exactly
14:04:21 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:glance_image_config,n,z
14:04:27 <flaper87> rosmaita: coolio
14:04:41 <rosmaita> just want to make sure it doesn't affect v1->v2 work
14:04:49 <flaper87> yeah, I just talked with johnthetubaguy to schedule reviews for that and try to avoid conflicts w/ mfedosin's work
14:04:55 <rosmaita> great
14:05:13 <flaper87> it'd be also good for us to provide some reviews on Sean's work
14:05:19 <flaper87> let's see what can be done
14:05:32 <flaper87> ok, moving on! Thanks rosmaita
14:05:34 <flaper87> #topic Switch VMware Driver to use requests (sabari)
14:05:36 <rosmaita> np
14:05:40 <flaper87> sabari: I guess you're sleeping
14:05:47 <rosmaita> this looks like a good change to me
14:05:56 <rosmaita> is the question just about whether it needs a spec?
14:05:57 <flaper87> but after looking at the patch/bug, I'd recommend to tag it as spec-lite and get the patch merged
14:06:02 <flaper87> rosmaita: yeah
14:06:05 <rosmaita> flaper87: +1
14:06:14 <flaper87> nikhil: objections ?
14:06:15 <nikhil> sounds good to me
14:06:21 <rosmaita> yay!
14:09:16 <rosmaita> it is awful quiet in here ... hope i didn't get netsplit
14:10:35 <nikhil> don't think so
14:10:44 <nikhil> may be flaper87's conn dropped
14:10:55 <sabari> flaper87 nikhil rosmaita: thanks guys :)
14:11:02 <nikhil> :)
14:11:09 <rosmaita> sabari: np
14:11:37 <rosmaita> we can start next topic, the "in" operator spec
14:11:51 <nikhil> rosmaita: sure
14:11:56 <rosmaita> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246971/
14:12:04 <nikhil> info: topic change won't work
14:12:09 <flaper87> ops, sorry
14:12:12 <flaper87> back now
14:12:13 <flaper87> #chair rosmaita
14:12:13 <openstack> Current chairs: flaper87 rosmaita
14:12:15 <flaper87> #topic Add 'in' operartor (flaper87)
14:12:30 <flaper87> I think I'm back
14:12:37 <rosmaita> you are
14:12:42 <rosmaita> my conn is slow today, too
14:12:49 <flaper87> w00h000
14:12:58 <flaper87> ok, that one needs a couple of more +2's
14:13:05 <flaper87> I'd like to get at least 3 since it impacts the API
14:13:12 <rosmaita> quick question
14:13:19 <rosmaita> about erno's comment
14:13:34 <rosmaita> i sort of agree that we want to push off fancy search stuff to searchlight
14:13:37 <rosmaita> but
14:13:47 <rosmaita> we don't have any kind of "or" filtering ATM
14:13:58 <rosmaita> so i think maybe this is OK
14:14:07 <rosmaita> just wondering what others think
14:14:38 <flaper87> rosmaita: you mean, it'd be fine to have `in` and `or` but not more than that ?
14:14:54 <nikhil> I like the 'in' operator
14:15:02 <rosmaita> flaper87: well, the "in" is kind of an "or", the way i understand it
14:15:03 <nikhil> it's harmless for the most part
14:15:14 <flaper87> rosmaita: ah sure, yeah!
14:15:23 <ativelkov> we'll have some "in" searches in glare as well - so this one looks consistent
14:15:38 <mfedosin> officially it's called "in" :)
14:15:42 <flaper87> I think this is fine. I'd be hesitant to add more filters, tbh. But I can see how this can be useful for folks talking to Glance
14:15:46 <rosmaita> so while i think this change is good, i don't think we want to encourage this too much
14:15:51 <rosmaita> flaper87: +1
14:15:56 <rosmaita> ativelkov: that is a good data point
14:15:58 <nikhil> agreed rosmaita
14:16:04 <rosmaita> consistency with glare is good
14:16:19 <flaper87> also, Searchlight, to me, is more for UI's and other use-cases. When it comes to service-to-service (undercloud) comms, I think we should have support for a minimum set of filters
14:16:31 <rosmaita> flaper87: that makes sense
14:16:40 <ativelkov> flaper87: ++
14:16:52 <rosmaita> just wanted to make sure we discussed it
14:16:57 <flaper87> ok, just +2'd that spec
14:17:08 <rosmaita> i am good with this spec
14:17:17 <flaper87> rosmaita: yup, makes sense. Also, we should probably reply to Erno, I don't want his comment to be left unanswered
14:17:20 <flaper87> I can do that
14:17:54 <flaper87> ok, next topic, unless there's more to discuss in this one
14:18:10 <rosmaita> flaper87: i'll reply to erno, since i share his concern
14:18:15 <nikhil> nothing from me
14:18:16 <rosmaita> will summarize the above
14:18:20 <flaper87> rosmaita: awesome, thanks!
14:18:25 <flaper87> #topic Deprecate V3 API (flaper87)
14:18:32 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254163/
14:19:07 <flaper87> That one seems complete to me. rosmaita had +2'd it already but I asked mfedosin to move the spec under the `approved` dir
14:19:17 <flaper87> it'll need to be +2'd again
14:19:22 <rosmaita> looking
14:19:47 <mfedosin> and I changed "testing" section
14:19:59 <flaper87> mfedosin: right, thanks for that :)
14:21:05 <flaper87> ok, let's move on if there's nothing more here. We have some lite-specs to review
14:21:27 <flaper87> #topic Lite Specs
14:21:37 <flaper87> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/1487086
14:21:37 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1487086 in python-glanceclient "Pagination doesn't work with v2 API image-list" [Wishlist,New] - Assigned to Kairat Kushaev (kkushaev)
14:21:46 <flaper87> That one proposes adding pagination to the CLI
14:22:11 <flaper87> I think it's useful but, now that the OSC cross-spec is landing, I'm wondering whether we should have it in glanceclient
14:22:14 <flaper87> thoughts ?
14:22:20 <mclaren> hmm, is the title a bit misleading?
14:22:43 <nikhil> we currently have sorting available
14:22:52 <nikhil> so pagination doesn't seem to hurt
14:22:57 <mclaren> If I do a vanilla v2 image list I get pages of 25 back right?
14:23:14 <flaper87> mclaren: it didn't start as a spec-lite. WE can fix the title later, lets focus on the content
14:23:48 <flaper87> plus, the OSC will take time
14:23:51 <nikhil> though I don't get the problem behind it
14:24:05 <flaper87> I agree it doesn't hurt and it shouldn't require lot of work
14:24:26 <mclaren> ok, is this the problem statement: v2 client listing doesn't have support for markers?
14:24:28 <nikhil> hmm, looks a small change
14:24:56 <nikhil> mostly to proxy on glance-api pagination and nothing new to be added within the client itself so should be relatively small
14:25:11 <flaper87> nikhil: right
14:25:34 <flaper87> mclaren: rosmaita any objections to having this in glanceclient ?
14:26:13 <flaper87> we've like 4 mins left
14:26:19 <flaper87> 3
14:26:24 <rosmaita> was looking at the bug
14:26:33 <mclaren> flaper87: this is just allowing the user to specify a marker when listing?
14:26:49 <mclaren> I updated the title based on that
14:26:53 <mclaren> if so seems fine to me
14:26:59 <flaper87> mclaren: yes, and limit I believe
14:27:02 <nikhil> umm
14:27:04 <nikhil> yeah
14:27:08 <nikhil> I think we need both
14:27:14 <rosmaita> mclaren: that's my understanding
14:27:16 <rosmaita> nikhil: +1
14:27:17 <flaper87> yup, ok!
14:27:26 <flaper87> I'll approve that lite spec
14:27:33 <flaper87> that's it
14:27:36 <mclaren> yeah it's just a small client change
14:27:37 <flaper87> #topic Open Discussion
14:27:48 <flaper87> #info We're 2 weeks away from Glance's spec freeze
14:28:07 <flaper87> please, lets focus on specs, I'm keeping a list of spec prios in the meeting ehterpad
14:28:11 <flaper87> etherpad*
14:28:15 <rosmaita> guess i need to update import again
14:28:28 <flaper87> We need to finalize the import spec too
14:28:29 <rosmaita> i will do it before thurs meeting
14:28:34 <mclaren> there's another lite spec here https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1525259
14:28:34 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1525259 in Glance "Add request_ids attribute to v2 schemas" [Wishlist,New] - Assigned to Abhishek Kekane (abhishek-kekane)
14:28:38 <rosmaita> mclaren has to stop asking tough questions
14:28:44 <flaper87> Also, there are some work items on the import spec we can start working on
14:28:55 <flaper87> mclaren: will look offline, time's up
14:29:04 <flaper87> Thanks folks :)
14:29:10 <flaper87> #endmeeting