14:00:48 <nikhil_k> #startmeeting glance drivers
14:00:49 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 15 14:00:48 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is nikhil_k. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:50 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:52 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'glance_drivers'
14:01:05 <rosmaita> o/
14:01:15 <nikhil_k> So, I wanted to discuss two things quickly today
14:01:21 <mfedosin> o/
14:01:24 <nikhil_k> 1. ova/ovf stuff
14:01:31 <nikhil_k> 2. scrubbing in parallel
14:01:37 <nikhil_k> Let's get started
14:01:44 <flaper87> lets start w/ #2
14:01:46 <flaper87> seems more complete
14:01:48 <flaper87> :P
14:01:51 <flaper87> and rosmaita and I +2'd it already
14:02:02 <nikhil_k> oops, forgot to mention we don't have a set agenda for today
14:02:09 * flaper87 just hijacked nikhil_k's list
14:02:11 <flaper87> sorry about that :(
14:02:16 <nikhil_k> np
14:02:28 <rosmaita> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196240/
14:02:34 <nikhil_k> we can start with 2 but we will need to chat about 1 today so that we can decide on it's fate
14:02:43 <nikhil_k> #topic scrubbing in parallel
14:02:55 <flaper87> nikhil_k: yup, we get #2 out of the way and spend the rest of the time on 1
14:03:08 <nikhil_k> So, the only thing missing for
14:03:09 <nikhil_k> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196240/
14:03:15 <flaper87> As I mentioned in our last meeting, with the spec, I think I'm good w/ it landing
14:03:22 <nikhil_k> is that we don't know if doc team gave a green light on that
14:03:37 <nikhil_k> once that is confirmed it seems pretty complete
14:03:41 <flaper87> nikhil_k: good point
14:03:49 <nikhil_k> rosmaita: hemanthm : any thing on that yet?
14:03:54 <nikhil_k> jcook: ^
14:04:05 <nikhil_k> not sure who was handling that action item
14:04:08 <rosmaita> not from me
14:04:12 <nikhil_k> I see
14:04:21 <rosmaita> but i wasn't actually looking into it
14:04:35 <rosmaita> i could, though ... what's the issue?
14:04:38 <nikhil_k> so, what I will do is send a email to concerned folks and see if they were able to contact the doc team and got a response
14:05:00 * flaper87 nods
14:05:11 <nikhil_k> rosmaita: it has a config and we need to clear with documentation team if that's okay
14:05:29 <nikhil_k> we can hold off RC until then but not for too long
14:05:51 <jcook> nikhil_k: hi
14:05:56 <rosmaita> ok, i will contact. they currently generate by crawling the config files, so i don't think there should be a problem
14:06:21 <flaper87> rosmaita: ++
14:06:32 <nikhil_k> I see, hopefully the crawling and release from docs doesn't happen until the project(s) are released
14:06:50 <nikhil_k> release from docs == publishing for Liberty
14:06:54 <jcook> nikhil_k: the green light on the docs? I thought hemanthm was working directly with you on that. Let me ping him on another channel and see if he is around.
14:07:00 <rosmaita> exactly
14:08:10 <jcook> nikhil_k: if we don't have it yet, I will work with hemanthm to reach out this morning
14:08:31 <nikhil_k> jcook: thanks. let's sycn offline to ensure we can let this one through.
14:08:45 <jcook> nikhil_k: sounds good. thanks!
14:08:51 <nikhil_k> #topic ova/ovf
14:08:52 * flaper87 +2'd the spec as a sign he's ok w/ it
14:08:58 <nikhil_k> thanks flaper87 !
14:08:58 <flaper87> well, that's what +2s are for
14:08:59 <flaper87> :P
14:09:05 <nikhil_k> about this one
14:09:16 <nikhil_k> I checked and there were some issues with the code
14:09:36 <flaper87> up and I'm doing another review now and there are still issues
14:09:38 <nikhil_k> I am not being too picky about the spec at this point
14:09:58 <flaper87> not minor things that I'd be happy to skip like: "Checking on extensions rather than using ovf's metadata"
14:10:18 <flaper87> There are other minor things that are totally fixable
14:10:21 <jokke_> I did review on it yesterday
14:10:28 <flaper87> jokke_: thanks for that review
14:10:33 <flaper87> They are being responsive, FWIW
14:10:48 <flaper87> so, I'd expect there to be a new version of this patch w/ fixes for my comments by the end of today
14:11:03 <flaper87> (if they keep this pace)
14:11:20 <nikhil_k> the question remains
14:11:30 <nikhil_k> the one question*
14:11:40 <nikhil_k> should we hold off till thursday ?
14:11:48 <nikhil_k> and make a call then?
14:11:57 <flaper87> I'd make the call on thursday
14:11:59 <flaper87> yes
14:12:11 <rosmaita> +1
14:12:31 <jokke_> Well I think we're starting to be in stage that if it's nor mergeable by end of the week, they just don't get in on time?
14:12:44 <flaper87> jokke_: RC1 is on Friday so no
14:12:46 <jokke_> or did we have still next week before RC1 tags?
14:12:52 <flaper87> it has to be mergeable by thursday
14:13:11 <hemanthm> o/
14:13:40 <jokke_> yeah ... so I think at this point it's kind of needless to look timeline for decision, if it does not merge by that it's out ... I'm happy to review when there is something changing
14:13:48 <nikhil_k> umm, I am not sure
14:13:56 <flaper87> oh wait
14:14:01 <flaper87> RC1 is next week
14:14:05 <nikhil_k> Will have to double check but I think we can merge it next week
14:14:08 <nikhil_k> yep, exactly
14:14:08 * flaper87 got confused
14:14:11 <nikhil_k> np
14:14:13 <flaper87> sorry about that
14:14:21 <nikhil_k> clients are this week
14:14:23 <flaper87> so yeah, we still have next week until Tuesday
14:14:25 <jokke_> ok, so that 18th was our internal deadline
14:14:27 <flaper87> ish
14:14:30 <flaper87> jokke_: correct
14:14:34 <flaper87> sorry for the confusion
14:14:36 <nikhil_k> so we can wait till early next week
14:14:47 <nikhil_k> jokke_: yes
14:15:23 <nikhil_k> jokke_: if they have the latest uploaded on 18th and looks okay in the gate on monday besides minor nits, I think we should let them though else not
14:15:46 <nikhil_k> but we should final on the spec on thursday
14:15:56 <nikhil_k> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Liberty_Release_Schedule
14:16:15 <hemanthm> nikhil_k: sorry, I had my head burried in logs. I will ping you offline about the doc stuff since you guys have moved on to a diffrent topic
14:16:50 <nikhil_k> hemanthm: sure
14:17:11 <jokke_> well if they do fix the pointer myself and flaper87 put into the reviews, they should be pretty much good to go I think ... it's not huge change ... my biggest worry is that they still modify existing image, which was fairly early flagged as no-no
14:17:46 <flaper87> jokke_: you mean, the properties ?
14:17:58 <jokke_> no I mean the image data
14:18:23 <flaper87> where? I think I missed that. Lets talk offline about this
14:18:24 <flaper87> :D
14:18:36 <nikhil_k> yes, image record and data needs to be created after task has completed
14:19:07 <nikhil_k> rather, just beforre task is in success
14:19:47 <jokke_> my last comment on the change ...
14:19:55 <jokke_> from yesterday
14:20:03 <flaper87> jokke_: will re-read that
14:20:41 <nikhil_k> has anyone tested this on devstack?
14:20:55 <nikhil_k> I am getting a little hesitent on the edge cases
14:21:05 <flaper87> nikhil_k: I'm testing this manually
14:21:12 <nikhil_k> ah cool
14:21:15 <flaper87> as in, I haven't but I downloaded it early
14:21:24 <flaper87> and I'm installing everything
14:21:27 <flaper87> I'll let you know
14:21:32 <nikhil_k> thanks!
14:22:04 <nikhil_k> the failure cases of uploads and of the tar process can blow up the script
14:22:17 <nikhil_k> hopefully not the g-api
14:22:31 <flaper87> don't think so. Taskflow is very good at catching these things
14:22:46 <flaper87> but this introduces another issue which is that we fail to report things back to users
14:23:23 <flaper87> anyway, I'll report back on the review
14:24:15 <nikhil_k> sure, I was mostly worried about the garbage data left over during failed tar and streams to store
14:24:35 <nikhil_k> may be I will review it closer to see the wrapped are doing those
14:24:51 <flaper87> nikhil_k: one of my comments is on an unhandled case like that
14:24:58 <nikhil_k> cool
14:25:04 <nikhil_k> if nothing on this one, let's move on the open discussion
14:25:07 <flaper87> there's a case were data is being left behind on failre in the current PS
14:25:11 * flaper87 has nothing else
14:25:13 <nikhil_k> ah
14:25:16 <nikhil_k> awesome!
14:25:20 <nikhil_k> #topic open discussion
14:25:35 <nikhil_k> hemanthm: you have a chance now :P
14:25:54 <nikhil_k> or we can talk about RC important bugs that people know about
14:26:15 <nikhil_k> there has been good cleanup in
14:26:16 <nikhil_k> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-liberty-rc-reviews
14:26:25 <nikhil_k> thanks everyone for taking care of that!
14:26:46 <nikhil_k> we need image signing stuff reviewed soon-ish
14:26:53 <flaper87> w000h0000
14:27:02 <nikhil_k> I can volunteer as one reviewer
14:27:10 * flaper87 will get to that after finishing with ovf
14:27:24 <nikhil_k> someone else please put your name against it so that I can be aware of the possible roadblocks
14:28:09 <nikhil_k> also, I was told that there are blockers for murano in the fasttrack zone
14:28:13 <nikhil_k> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fastTrackPatches
14:28:20 <nikhil_k> if people have b/w we can get to thouse
14:28:34 <hemanthm> nikhil_k: Basically, I haven't reached out to doc folks yet.
14:29:09 <rosmaita> hemanthm: am talking to docs folks now
14:29:23 <nikhil_k> ok, please do soon. we need to cut the RCs early next week if possible by gating and other openstack parameters.
14:29:44 <hemanthm> rosmaita: awesome thanks.
14:29:46 <hemanthm> nikhil_k: sure
14:30:15 <nikhil_k> We are out of time. Thanks all for joining.
14:30:25 <nikhil_k> #endmeeting