14:01:36 <nikhil_k> #startmeeting glance drivers
14:01:37 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Aug  4 14:01:36 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is nikhil_k. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:01:38 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:01:40 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'glance_drivers'
14:02:31 <nikhil_k> We have no agenda today
14:02:54 <nikhil_k> Let's do a quick run through the specs
14:03:02 <sigmavirus24> okay
14:03:12 <rosmaita> ok
14:04:31 <nikhil_k> #topic specs run through
14:04:33 <rosmaita> if we have time, maybe we can discuss https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208441/ , don't think there's a spec up yet
14:04:34 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194868/
14:05:37 <rosmaita> that one needs a response to comments
14:05:44 <rosmaita> it's written as a change to upload
14:05:54 <rosmaita> i suggested making it part of an import workflow
14:06:09 <rosmaita> what would remain is where it would live as part of an import
14:06:32 <rosmaita> some ops at the vancouver summit suggested a repo of task "plugins" to share scripts
14:07:26 <nikhil_k> I was looking for some rest api impact as this would definitely add some constraints there
14:07:48 <nikhil_k> may be a mention that the body provided in the task would suffice and no REST calls are being changed
14:08:15 <rosmaita> i agree, but they haven't commited to making it a task yet
14:08:31 <nikhil_k> We had agreed to merge it but then we got some more comments. Guess a courtesy email to the developers is needed.
14:08:59 <nikhil_k> The agreement has been for the import task and so has been the communication with all collaborators
14:09:12 <nikhil_k> the wordings and the structure of the spec needs to change
14:10:06 <rosmaita> not sure they got the message about the import task, malini pinged me off-list asking the diff between upload and import task
14:10:12 <nikhil_k> Also, it would involve change to the prop protection file, that needs to be indicated. it's a good miss by the reviewers
14:11:08 <nikhil_k> #action indicate the developers to restructure the spec around import task
14:11:33 <nikhil_k> next
14:11:35 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206120/
14:12:45 <sigmavirus24> +1
14:12:58 <nikhil_k> We had a decent discussion at the midcycle on this.
14:13:09 <nikhil_k> Seems like the spec has been updated with those details
14:14:27 <nikhil_k> Looks good overall and it has been tentatively proposed developer time for liberty
14:15:16 <nikhil_k> Guess we can revisit this next week to see if any comments and/or major flaws. If none, we can merge it then. Until then the developers can adopt this approach for code.
14:15:53 <rosmaita> i just +1'd with some grammar nits
14:15:53 <nikhil_k> Next
14:16:02 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149467/
14:16:17 <nikhil_k> That one needs grammar updates too and then is waiting or +A
14:16:21 <nikhil_k> for*
14:16:54 <nikhil_k> sigmavirus24: any comments?
14:16:59 <nikhil_k> or should we move on?
14:17:27 <nikhil_k> next
14:17:29 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/207042
14:17:55 <nikhil_k> There's code proposed against glance repo for this
14:18:07 <nikhil_k> looks like it's in a good shape
14:18:20 <nikhil_k> except for grammar and other minor details
14:19:10 <nikhil_k> We can approve it next week or earlier.
14:19:14 * sigmavirus24 was reading jcook's spec. I'd like to have the grammar changes for my spec in a follow-up since they're all grammar nits if that's cool.
14:19:20 <sigmavirus24> (I think we should allow that for most specs)
14:19:33 <nikhil_k> sigmavirus24: sure, I can +A that now
14:19:49 <nikhil_k> as long as there is _some_ promise
14:19:56 <nikhil_k> next
14:20:00 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/177948
14:20:00 <rosmaita> i am ok wiht 207042 with no changes
14:21:15 <nikhil_k> That one has been updated to support just signing and does not have encryption now
14:21:39 <sigmavirus24> nikhil_k: it's on my todo list so it'll be done :D
14:21:55 <rosmaita> on my todo list too
14:22:00 <nikhil_k> Well documented and updated as per the discussion at the midcycle
14:22:08 <sigmavirus24> yeah I need to go through the specs and read all of them again :D
14:22:14 <nikhil_k> planning to approve it prior to next weeks meeting
14:22:25 <sigmavirus24> okay I'll definitely re-read it one last time then :D
14:22:36 <jcook> hola
14:22:43 <rosmaita> if the text reflects what we agreed on at the midcycle, i have not problem +2ing it
14:22:45 <sigmavirus24> woops, sorry for the ping jcook
14:22:59 <rosmaita> but i do want to read it again
14:23:00 <nikhil_k> cool
14:23:07 <nikhil_k> next
14:23:09 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/205632
14:23:10 <nikhil_k> and
14:23:19 <rosmaita> jcook: ian was saying nice things about you
14:23:31 <jcook> he's too kind :D
14:23:32 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206250/
14:23:51 <nikhil_k> Those are related to reliability and are asked for liberty
14:24:02 <jcook> I'm not sure why jenkins failed on the former
14:24:04 <rosmaita> i already +2d the first one
14:25:21 <jcook> I get a file not found, maybe it just needs a recheck
14:27:46 <nikhil_k> I need to go through these two again for this week. If no objections by then we can approve first one prior to meeting and second one during/soon after.
14:28:12 <nikhil_k> #topic open discussion
14:28:49 <nikhil_k> If nothing,
14:28:54 <nikhil_k> have a good day everyone
14:29:02 <nikhil_k> Thanks for joining!
14:29:03 <rosmaita> got a minute?
14:29:10 <nikhil_k> almost
14:29:26 <nikhil_k> rosmaita: ?
14:29:32 <rosmaita> i wonder about our attitude toward the review i linked earlier
14:29:42 <nikhil_k> oops, i missed it
14:29:53 <rosmaita> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208441/
14:30:03 <rosmaita> we can discuss in openstack-glance3
14:30:18 <rosmaita> (not '3', that was a typo)
14:30:54 <nikhil_k> cool
14:30:57 <nikhil_k> #endmeeting