14:00:06 #startmeeting glance 14:00:06 Meeting started Thu May 12 14:00:06 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is pdeore. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:06 The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 14:00:06 #topic roll call 14:00:06 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda 14:00:13 o/ 14:00:17 o/ 14:00:18 o/ 14:00:25 o/ 14:00:28 o/ 14:00:35 o/ 14:00:54 o/ 14:01:02 everyone is here .. let's start :) 14:01:12 #topic release/periodic jobs 14:01:24 Milestone 1 release is just one week away and we will verify whether we are going to tag the M1 or not 14:01:37 but we are going to release glance-store for sure 14:02:03 Periodic jobs all green except POST_FAILURE for fips job and 2 oslo tips jobs failure for python3.6 because of dropping py36/37 support and updated to py38 in oslo.config 14:02:09 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.config/+/840592 14:02:22 the glance side fixes are submitted for the same 14:02:27 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/841350 14:02:28 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/841368 14:02:38 Kindly please have a look 14:02:47 former patch is dependent on later one 14:03:03 so be in touch with infra core team for the same 14:03:12 ack 14:03:34 moving ahead 14:03:42 #topic Spec repo maintenance 14:03:52 not sure who added this topic :) 14:04:00 croelandt, is that you? 14:05:09 I have approved 1st 3 specs 14:05:52 will visit 2.2 after the meeting and take appropriate actions 14:06:11 ack 14:06:20 let's move ahead 14:06:29 #topic Specs For Review 14:06:30 pdeore: no 14:06:46 Most of the specs are merged, now just need some attention at 14:06:52 might be rosmaita have added 14:06:53 Expanding store details - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/835606 (two +2) 14:06:53 Update proposal for duplicate image download - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/734683 14:07:04 croelandt, ohh i thought it's you :) 14:07:36 kindly have a look at these specs ^ 14:07:48 ack 14:07:58 moving ahead 14:08:02 #topic Missing specs 14:08:25 Need spec for Inject metadata for upload - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/835462 14:08:57 dansmith, have you got any response from tobias (hope this is right pronunciation) 14:09:20 Or should I go ahead a write a spec for it? 14:09:47 abhishekk: nope haven't heard, but we should ping him 14:09:47 dansmith, is buys with infra team atm, I will ping him later 14:09:58 where can we find him :D 14:10:28 he is present in cinder channel, I will ping him later 14:10:33 ack 14:11:01 ok, moving ahead 14:11:07 #topic Secure RBAC 14:11:25 We have discussed the glance side queries regarding system scope implemetation in last policy popup meeting 14:11:47 (sorry, i am stuck running another meeting) 14:11:51 kindly have a look for more details, #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/glance-rbac-system-scope 14:11:58 ok, anything specific to share? 14:12:05 share/highlight? 14:12:55 yeah, regarding owner issue for system scope, how we should handle system scope for all create/update metadef apis? 14:13:24 we can already create those with a specific owner right? 14:13:25 abhishekk, should i explain the details from etherpad? 14:13:33 like, the admin can create them on behalf of another yser? 14:13:39 yes you can pass --owner as input 14:14:20 yeah, so making those APIs system-scope and always requiring --owner is one option 14:14:24 but we need to add the validation if it is missing from the request body 14:14:29 since they're already admin-only anyway 14:14:49 yeah, I have suggested that option as well 14:15:25 ok, and should keep those for both system & project admin? or just system admin? 14:15:31 this is more feasible I guess 14:15:39 yeah it seems so 14:15:43 just for sysadmin 14:15:47 pdeore: we should not have it under both scopes 14:15:49 ok 14:15:57 unless absolutely necessary, and this is not a suitable case I think 14:16:04 agree 14:16:08 ohh ok 14:16:14 because what we want is to say "only operators should call these apis" 14:16:15 pdeore, I think you can write one spec for this change 14:16:32 abhishekk, sure I will do that 14:17:02 cool, that will help us to finalize the approach before actually start working on it 14:17:13 yeah right! 14:17:59 ok, let's move ahead 14:18:04 #topic glance-download import method 14:18:12 spec : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/836132 ( few minor comments) 14:18:37 I don't think the owner of the spec is present today for the discussion 14:18:38 merge and allow follow-up? 14:18:51 I think that is good option 14:19:21 will try to find them till tomorrow else will allow them to modify it as a followup 14:19:43 ack 14:20:07 ok, let's move to Open Discussion 14:20:09 #topic Open Discussion 14:20:41 dansmith, I have updated the glance-tempest plugin rbac patches with your suggetsion, kindly please have a look when you have time 14:20:50 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-tempest-plugin/+/802792/20 14:20:50 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-tempest-plugin/+/802794/15 14:20:50 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-tempest-plugin/+/802795 14:20:50 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-tempest-plugin/+/802795 14:21:08 ack, sorry 14:21:18 alistarle, is here 14:21:19 alistarle, is here :) 14:21:57 alistarle, there are some small suggestions on glance-download spec, once you fix it we can merge it right away 14:22:13 dansmith, np :) but I think we should get those merge in this milestone at least :) 14:22:43 Hello there, oh nice, we will fix that then 14:23:17 cool, thank you 14:23:44 Just a quick reminder. Changes like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/840409 is API breaking, so please, be careful and lets try to get the responses right on the first time. We absolutely cannot break the stable branches backporting minor looking fixes like that 14:23:57 I have also shared coding standards we follow with your colleague 14:24:49 jokke_, ack, noted 14:25:02 And ^^^ is not to point fingers, just reminding everyone to be careful with these things 14:25:21 yep 14:25:29 jokke_, sure 14:25:44 pslestang, do you have any questions related to comments on your spec? 14:26:23 Once you submit the new patch for spec, we will get it merged quickly as everything is sorted out 14:27:16 so that's is from me, anyone has anything else to discuss or we should wrap up? 14:27:30 nothing from me as well 14:27:42 One quick question 14:28:08 abhishekk: nope it should be good 14:28:18 pslestang, cool 14:28:26 There is spec proposal from Rajat about new locations APIs. Do we want to discuss that here or just keep the comments going on the review and what's the timeline for that? 14:28:42 timeline is M2 14:29:11 you can post your comment on the spec and I can invite him for discussion during our next meeting 14:29:57 no spec will be approved post M2 14:30:03 Sounds good ... I'll try to remember put my notes in the review tomorrow so there is next week to preo 14:30:06 prep 14:30:07 M2 --> Milestone 2 14:30:20 sounds good 14:31:41 that's all from me for now, thanks 14:31:56 cool, let's wrap up for today! 14:32:07 thank you! 14:32:07 Thanks everyone for joining !! 14:32:19 have a nice weekend o/~ 14:32:20 #endmeeting