14:00:01 #startmeeting glance 14:00:01 Meeting started Thu Feb 24 14:00:01 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is abhishekk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:01 The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 14:00:03 #topic roll call 14:00:11 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda 14:00:16 o/ 14:00:31 o/ 14:00:37 o/ 14:00:40 o/ 14:00:45 o/ 14:00:49 cool, lets start 14:00:55 #topic Updates 14:01:22 Zed PTG planning etherpad is up, you can add your interested topics in belpw etherpad 14:01:29 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-ptg-glance-planning 14:02:03 I will finalize the topics 1 week before PTG i.e last week of March 14:02:13 #topic release/periodic jobs update 14:02:50 this is M3 release week, but we are going to skip it and tag rc1 directly next week 14:03:05 Client release patch is up and will be merge today 14:03:18 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-glanceclient/+/829653 14:04:06 Periodic job, 1 failure today and 2 failures yesterday, test_delayed_delete is failing with lock on SQLALchemy db 14:04:39 I will run it locally to see whether it is recurring or not 14:05:05 I need to prepare final release note patch for glance release 14:05:25 will do it shortly after the meeting and add you guys as a reviewer 14:05:45 moving ahead 14:05:48 #topic glanceclient-dsvm-functional job 14:06:09 2 days before croelandt asked me why don't we have functional tests on client side 14:06:14 and I found this job 14:06:28 but to my surprise it is running unit tests 14:06:41 #link https://c084ebf856caeb602128-bb81120481bfc1a9d88d226642da11d8.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/800172/7/gate/glanceclient-dsvm-functional/ba0d0b5/testr_results.html 14:07:05 jokke_, rosmaita do you have any idea about this job and why it is running unit tests 14:07:12 looking 14:07:24 because we are setting entire openstack and it runs unit tests which makes no sense 14:08:52 I have no idea about that test job, I think the reason we do not have functional run for gc is because we practically have no functional tests for it 14:09:13 we do have couple of tests in functional directory 14:09:48 Yes, Louis started to write them years ago, but that work got never carried on 14:10:04 there is couple, that's why "practically no functional tests" 14:10:08 the job def in .zuul.yaml doesn't set a tox_envlist 14:10:18 it inherits from devstack-tox-functional 14:10:29 which should call tox -e functional 14:10:41 (looking at what's in tox.ini) 14:11:05 right, but I think it's not calling it 14:11:40 Yeah, not sure where that is coming from but if it's dsvm job just running unit tests, we should get rid of it 14:11:52 I think we should retire this job until we have some useful functional tests 14:11:53 no, we should fix it to run the functional tests 14:13:04 rosmaita, we can add it back once we have valid/reasonable functional tests 14:13:30 at this moment it sounds like wasting resources 14:15:29 let's see if this does anything: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-glanceclient/+/830824 14:15:42 I will have a look and find out whether it is easy to add more tests or it will need whole restructuring to get this job do what it is intended to do 14:15:44 rosmaita, ak 14:15:46 ack 14:16:09 i'm pretty sure it used to work 14:16:34 ok, we will revisit this topic next week 14:16:35 abhishekk: I agree, it spends half an hour of infra resources to set up environment if we run the functional part, that consists literally 1 test excercising that devstack it sets up 14:17:17 the 2 more tests there are testing just cli (help and version) 14:17:29 yeah, lets see the output of rosmaita's patch and we can decide next week 14:17:46 anyways now there will be no patch we are going to submit for client 14:18:16 We can take the decision in next meeting about it 14:18:27 that's all from me 14:18:43 moving to Open discussion 14:18:50 #topic Open discussion 14:19:25 can any one of you submit the final release patch for glance by next week 14:19:41 I can do that 14:19:47 You're gonna be on PTO? 14:19:50 I might not be around on Monday and Tuesday for some urgency 14:19:56 kk 14:20:00 sure thing 14:20:15 yeah, most probably 14:20:19 thank you 14:20:34 I will submit the reno patch tonight and then we are good to go for release 14:20:46 cool 14:21:02 anything else guys? 14:21:09 Nothing in our bug list that should have been addressed? 14:21:22 I don't think we have been doing scrubbing for a while 14:21:22 nothing important 14:21:26 nice 14:21:59 * croelandt sends patches :D 14:22:16 2 weeks before croelandt and me gone through recent bugs 14:22:17 * jokke_ starts stretching -2 finger 14:22:32 so we are good for this cycle 14:22:35 abhishekk: yeah I looked at a bunch of glanceclient patches 14:22:46 and there are leftover patches from the reveiw party that we could +2 :p 14:22:56 jokke_: do you have a dedicated finger for -2? 14:23:02 croelandt: ofc 14:23:04 I wonder which one it could be 14:23:12 the middle one 14:23:12 haha 14:23:21 ;P 14:23:47 * croelandt was not really wondering 14:24:01 next gerrit update: the -2 red button is replaced with a middle finger emoji 14:24:03 nothing more from me at least if we want to cut out early 14:24:13 we can wrap up early if there is nothing to discuss 14:24:39 croelandt, we can suggest this to rosmaita if he becomes TC 14:24:53 we should 14:25:09 looking forward to it :D 14:25:25 ok, lets wrap up for today 14:25:28 thank you all!! 14:25:50 have a nice weekend ahead 14:26:05 thanks all 14:26:16 #endmeeting