14:00:15 <abhishekk> #startmeeting glance
14:00:15 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Feb 10 14:00:15 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is abhishekk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:15 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:15 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:00:22 <abhishekk> #topic roll call
14:00:33 <abhishekk> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:00:39 <abhishekk> o/
14:00:41 <jokke_> o/
14:00:49 <abhishekk> waiting for others to join
14:00:58 <abhishekk> how r you feeling now jokke_ ?
14:01:39 <rosmaita> o/
14:01:45 <abhishekk> croelandt, is here as well
14:01:47 <abhishekk> lets start
14:01:57 <abhishekk> #topic Updates
14:02:06 <abhishekk> PTL nominations are open
14:02:39 <jokke_> abhishekk: I'm good thanks
14:02:45 <jokke_> went over quick like expected
14:02:58 <abhishekk> jokke_, glad to hear
14:03:20 <abhishekk> So, I haven't got a chance to talk with Pranali as she was on leave entire week
14:03:41 <abhishekk> and probably she might need some more time to take this responsibility
14:04:06 <abhishekk> So I have decided to run for one more cycle if neither of you have any objection
14:04:18 <rosmaita> no objection!!!
14:04:28 <croelandt> +2 +1
14:04:47 <abhishekk> During this time, I will be working closely with her like jokke_ did with me
14:04:57 <rosmaita> sounds like a good plan
14:05:12 <abhishekk> great,
14:05:21 <jokke_> Sorry/Glad to hear ... no objections and I think it's a good plan forward as long as you're up for it
14:05:52 <abhishekk> cool, as long as you guys are here to support we are good
14:06:02 <abhishekk> moving ahead
14:06:17 <abhishekk> #topic release/periodic jobs update
14:06:29 <abhishekk> Non client library release is next week
14:06:49 <abhishekk> we are good on glance-store front, so I will tag the release on Monday
14:07:02 <rosmaita> have you checked the requirements?
14:07:16 <rosmaita> i mean, the minimum specified in requirements
14:07:34 <rosmaita> os-brick breaks on py3.9 right now, i am trying to figure out wtf
14:07:48 <abhishekk> I will have a look after the meeting
14:08:07 <abhishekk> thanks for pointing out
14:08:07 <rosmaita> we're supposed to support 3.6, 3.8, 3.9 but only have to test 3.6 and 3.9
14:08:10 <rosmaita> np
14:08:26 <abhishekk> ack
14:08:38 <abhishekk> will circle back to you if have any doubts
14:08:41 <jokke_> rosmaita: no 3.7?
14:08:51 <rosmaita> no, nobody likes 3.7
14:08:53 <jokke_> Isn't it just 3.6-3.9?
14:08:56 <jokke_> ah
14:09:20 <rosmaita> i think we stopped supporting 3.7 after victoria (or during)
14:09:27 <rosmaita> i didn't follow the discussion about why
14:09:28 <jokke_> Well nobody likes py3 but still we gotta do something bout it
14:09:38 <abhishekk> I think during
14:09:52 <jokke_> yeah I missed that memo
14:10:04 <abhishekk> Ok, Milestone-3 2 weeks from now
14:10:08 <jokke_> I thought we just tested lowest and highest and supported everything between
14:10:32 <abhishekk> means in 2 weeks we have at least 3 features to review
14:10:41 <abhishekk> Cache API, it has one +2
14:10:49 <abhishekk> Stores info detail api
14:11:00 <abhishekk> and Tags overwriting work
14:11:02 <jokke_> yes, sorry i know I promised to look through that ... Today it will happen
14:11:24 <abhishekk> no problem, I know you were not well
14:12:18 <abhishekk> Periodic jobs all green, but we are witnessing certain failures in our gate for glance-cinder-multistore job (not related to glance)
14:12:49 <abhishekk> I will have a look at those later
14:12:54 <jokke_> rosmaita: what did you do? ^^ ;D
14:12:55 <abhishekk> #topic Review priorities this week
14:13:09 <abhishekk> We have 3 topics to review this week
14:13:12 <rosmaita> :D
14:13:21 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fcache-api
14:13:43 <abhishekk> this is for Cache work, including API,Client and tempest changes
14:13:53 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fexpose-store-specific-info
14:14:05 <abhishekk> This is stores detail API including client side changes
14:14:15 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/827919
14:14:35 <abhishekk> This is 'db migration constant check' patch of rosmaita's
14:15:13 <abhishekk> I think all are important and good to go,if we manage to get these reviewed this week then it will offload us in next week
14:15:28 <abhishekk> So kindly have a look as and when you get some time
14:15:41 <rosmaita> someone +W the migration check now
14:15:45 <rosmaita> it's a no-brainer
14:16:19 <abhishekk> ++
14:16:29 <abhishekk> #topic Fips backports
14:16:56 <abhishekk> We are now testing fips in our gate, but I am seeing some backports to xena and wallaby are up
14:17:03 <abhishekk> Xena
14:17:03 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/828179
14:17:08 <abhishekk> Wallaby
14:17:09 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/828139
14:17:29 <abhishekk> what is your opinion about the same
14:17:41 <abhishekk> Since it is just related to test, should we allow it?
14:17:44 <jokke_> let me see
14:18:12 <abhishekk> migration constant or fips backports?
14:19:16 <jokke_> the fips backport
14:19:45 <abhishekk> ack, there are couple of fixes as well but all are in tests, and they are reported as bug
14:20:01 <jokke_> I'm bit worried that the job had already 50% failure rate on check. Is that job really stable enough that we don't need to be chasing it blocking stable gate for us?
14:20:36 <abhishekk> Wallaby
14:20:36 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/828139
14:20:40 <abhishekk> sorry
14:21:05 <abhishekk> yeah, that is because it requires some dependent patches to backported
14:21:06 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:afariasa%2540redhat.com+project:openstack/glance+status:open
14:21:22 <abhishekk> this is all the list of open backports
14:22:00 <abhishekk> Kindly comment on the patches, if you have any suggestions/questions
14:22:29 <jokke_> rosmaita: abhishekk: ref the constant check
14:22:57 <abhishekk> shoot
14:23:39 <rosmaita> listening
14:23:44 <jokke_> Should we add explanation of the need to address the SemVer with "api-break" to that doc. I think it's clear for all three of us that it's SemVer's idea of releasing Major version but we do that every cycle
14:24:23 <jokke_> Other than that the patch looks good and I like the added doc reminder, just thought that it might not be clear for all why it needs to be "api-break"
14:24:51 <rosmaita> ok, i can rewrite that real quick
14:25:05 <jokke_> if you do, I happily give my +2 for it
14:25:09 <abhishekk> cool, I think any additional information is good for everyone
14:25:22 <abhishekk> jokke_, you can +w as well if I am not around
14:25:29 <jokke_> abhishekk: grand
14:25:32 <jokke_> will do
14:25:36 <abhishekk> cool
14:25:45 <abhishekk> that's all for today
14:25:51 <jokke_> thanks rosmaita
14:25:51 <abhishekk> #topic Open discussion
14:26:02 <abhishekk> Any suggestions guys
14:26:42 <abhishekk> Kindly put your reviewers hat on for 15-20 minutes to review important patches
14:26:43 <jokke_> I don't have anything to add for now ... lets keep busy :D
14:27:03 <abhishekk> Cool
14:27:10 <abhishekk> rosmaita, croelandt ?
14:27:17 <croelandt> I'm good
14:27:29 <rosmaita> working on my update ... should post in 5 min
14:27:37 <abhishekk> great, lets end this then
14:27:41 <abhishekk> thank you all
14:27:45 <abhishekk> have a nice week ahead
14:28:02 <jokke_> cheers! o/~
14:28:27 <abhishekk> o/~
14:28:32 <abhishekk> #endmeeting