14:00:12 <abhishekk> #startmeeting glance
14:00:13 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Jun 10 14:00:12 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is abhishekk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:14 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:16 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:00:20 <abhishekk> #topic roll call
14:00:24 <abhishekk> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:00:29 <abhishekk> o/
14:00:31 <dansmith> o/
14:00:50 <abhishekk> may be just 3 of us today
14:00:55 <abhishekk> rosmaita and steap is on leave
14:01:14 <abhishekk> So I am postponing the bug discussion to next week
14:01:33 <jokke_> o/
14:01:50 <abhishekk> Ok, so just 3 of us today, others will be on leave
14:01:58 <abhishekk> Lets start
14:02:12 <abhishekk> #topic release/periodic jobs update
14:02:42 <abhishekk> M2 5 weeks from now
14:03:01 <abhishekk> We have 2 specs targeted for M2 and will discuss the progress later
14:03:12 <abhishekk> Periodic jobs all green for straight 5th week
14:03:23 <jokke_> nice
14:03:48 <abhishekk> yep, I guess one reason could be there is no rush in the gates at the moment
14:04:11 <abhishekk> moving ahead
14:04:15 <abhishekk> #topic Image Encryption without Secret Consumers
14:04:44 <abhishekk> There is a lite-spec to discuss Implementation of image encryption without consumers in this cycle
14:04:54 <abhishekk> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/792134
14:05:04 <abhishekk> me and Brian found it reasonable
14:05:18 <abhishekk> If you guys have any questions please add it to the spec
14:05:45 <abhishekk> Moving ahead
14:05:51 <abhishekk> #topic M2 Target progress check
14:06:02 <abhishekk> Unified quota spec
14:06:19 <abhishekk> Spec is approved for this work
14:06:19 <dansmith> I'll poke brian when he's back
14:06:30 <abhishekk> Implementation also is in good shape
14:06:31 <dansmith> hopefully he can take a trip through those
14:06:45 <abhishekk> I just want to highlight one thing
14:06:49 <dansmith> I also got changes to oslo.limit, which was released today, so we can also start on the usage api
14:07:04 <jokke_> dansmith: nice!
14:07:22 <abhishekk> Snapshot will be considered as image, right?
14:07:41 <dansmith> definitely, that's the whole point of cern's interest :)
14:07:44 <jokke_> abhishekk: yes in glance perspective snapshot is like any other image
14:08:09 <dansmith> btw, this was published today: https://techblog.web.cern.ch/techblog/post/50tb-of-cloud-images/
14:08:14 <abhishekk> So we need to highlight that in doc somewhere
14:08:26 <dansmith> abhishekk: why? isn't that obvious?
14:08:34 <jokke_> in matter of fact, Glance has nothing to even identify if something is snapshot or not
14:08:39 <dansmith> right
14:08:45 <jokke_> it has always been like that
14:09:07 <abhishekk> Ok
14:09:45 <abhishekk> So for example if we have image count set as 10
14:10:20 <abhishekk> Forget it, I will rephrase my question on doc patch
14:10:31 <dansmith> sounds good
14:10:55 <jokke_> there is another thing I'd like to point out. There was someone asking how to limit a store for admin only in the mailing list. Which is currently not possible, so that per store quota has already usecase that would make at least one user happy ;)
14:11:32 <dansmith> yup
14:11:45 <abhishekk> dansmith, good to see that our work is getting highlighted
14:11:48 <dansmith> when we merge basic functionality, I'm more than happy to work on the advanced stuff :)
14:12:03 <abhishekk> ++
14:12:14 <jokke_> currently they have hacked it via filestore+LVM to make sure the one store is always out of space unless they want to add new images to it and they expand the filesystem just to fit that one new image :P
14:12:39 <abhishekk> Cool :D
14:12:48 <jokke_> Not at all
14:13:25 <jokke_> creative, for sure, but not cool that someone needs to do crap like that, manually :~(
14:13:49 <abhishekk> yep
14:14:03 <abhishekk> Ok, moving towards another target
14:14:13 <abhishekk> Cache API
14:14:41 <abhishekk> I have modified the spec to include our discussion regarding policies and highlighted more about middleware
14:14:49 <abhishekk> Pending for review
14:15:01 <abhishekk> Client lite-spec is also up
14:15:17 <abhishekk> So kindly have a look at it
14:15:28 <abhishekk> We need to get this approved before next meeting
14:16:12 <jokke_> kk, will sanity check the diff today
14:16:16 <abhishekk> jokke_, please have a look at spec
14:16:19 <dansmith> I need to hit that cache api spec again since you revised,
14:16:19 <abhishekk> thanks
14:16:30 <dansmith> and I think I'm good on the client spec right?
14:16:46 <abhishekk> yes
14:17:17 <abhishekk> so this reminds me, that g-api-r does not work with uwsgi
14:17:28 <abhishekk> devstack is not able to complete the setup
14:17:30 <dansmith> eh?
14:17:39 <dansmith> it *only* works with uwsgi, IIRC
14:17:57 <jokke_> g-api-r?
14:18:01 <dansmith> https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/master/lib/glance#L507
14:18:05 <abhishekk> I saw some errors today, but I didn't noted those down
14:18:13 <dansmith> jokke_: the devstack service name for the second worker when configured
14:18:24 <jokke_> ah
14:18:47 <dansmith> abhishekk: let's visit that after the meeting and see what is up
14:18:49 <abhishekk> GLANCE_STANDALONE=True configures uwsgi ?
14:19:00 <dansmith> no the opposite
14:19:08 <dansmith> standalone means "not in uwsgi"
14:19:13 <abhishekk> ok, so then it does not work with standalone
14:19:20 <dansmith> i.e. running as an eventlet http server itself
14:19:23 <dansmith> correct
14:19:48 <abhishekk> ok
14:19:55 <abhishekk> will correct and check again
14:20:21 <abhishekk> So next week I am expecting that cache spec will be merged
14:20:57 <abhishekk> That's it for today, as I said earlier I am postponing the bug discussion to next week
14:21:10 <abhishekk> Moving to Open discussion
14:21:22 <abhishekk> #topic Open discussion
14:21:39 <abhishekk> dansmith, do you need any help in policy refactoring work?
14:22:17 <dansmith> yeah, I wasn't really expecting I was going to do it all alone.... but I've been working on other things and need to get back to expanding that and tests and things
14:22:28 <dansmith> there are two patches we can merge from that stack before the PoC patch I think
14:23:03 <abhishekk> I might be have some free time, so I can work with you on this
14:23:12 <dansmith> cool
14:24:19 <abhishekk> may be we can sync together sometime next week
14:24:58 <dansmith> sure
14:25:05 <abhishekk> anything else you want to highlight, jokke_ dansmith
14:25:17 <dansmith> don't think so
14:25:36 <abhishekk> jokke_ ?
14:26:44 <abhishekk> I take that as no
14:26:53 <abhishekk> Lets wrap up early
14:26:56 <jokke_> nothing from me
14:26:56 <abhishekk> thank you all
14:26:59 <jokke_> thanls
14:27:08 <abhishekk> have a nice week ahead
14:27:14 <abhishekk> #endmeeting