15:00:37 #startmeeting gantt 15:00:37 Meeting started Tue Mar 17 15:00:37 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:41 The meeting name has been set to 'gantt' 15:00:56 anyone here to talk about the scheduler (except lxsli who I know is here :-) 15:01:07 o/ 15:01:30 o/ 15:01:37 o/ 15:02:09 o/\o ! 15:02:34 lxsli, I don't want to know what that is :-) 15:02:42 anyway, let's get started... 15:02:43 highfive :) 15:03:05 I think we can keep it short today, just want to know if there are any patch isses that need to be dealt with so... 15:03:10 #topic patch status 15:03:17 still need to clone jay 15:03:25 Any outstanding issues/reviews/roadblocks we can help with? 15:03:31 the first patch in my series merged friday 15:03:42 edleafe, I saw that, congrats! 15:03:52 got a lot of feedback from dansmith and jaypipes on patch #2 15:04:08 changes have been pushed, and am waiting for follow-up reviews 15:04:24 #2 was the biggest change in terms of impact to the overall system 15:04:31 cool, so appropriate progress, that's all we can as for 15:04:38 so once that gets through, the rest shouldn't be as contentious 15:04:57 I have to admit, I'm a little conerned about the lack of strikeouts in the tracking page but last minutes pushes are normal 15:05:00 but to get them all in 2 days? Not very confident 15:05:47 edleafe, thanks for reviewing my patches, what happened to the rest of you ??? 15:06:15 PaulMurray, point taken, I want to do reviews today, hope to get to it 15:06:45 n0ano, thanks 15:06:58 edleafe, what is the patch you have waiting? 15:07:05 I've had machine issues (I don't want to talk about it :-( 15:07:18 \o 15:07:19 PaulMurray: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160511/ 15:07:19 n0ano, we can sell you another one :) 15:07:23 * bauzas waves late (again...) 15:07:40 PaulMurray, I work for Intel, the cobbler's kids go barefoot 15:07:54 PaulMurray: but it's really a jaypipes bottleneck issue right now 15:08:09 n0ano, that's why we're offering 15:08:17 bauzas, welcome, just looking for any patch issues 15:08:28 PaulMurray, tnx, I'm all better now 15:08:28 edleafe: I'm thinking that you should ask for an exception 15:08:32 FFE 15:08:40 * lxsli submits PaulMurray for additional ethics training 15:09:09 edleafe: I think we need to merge each patch one by one 15:09:13 bauzas: that may be necessary; depends on how close the series is to getting through 15:09:30 edleafe: I'll ask for the FFE process by next Nova meeting 15:09:36 should we ask for the exception now and avoid the rush 15:09:52 n0ano: feels premature 15:09:56 n0ano: FFEs are only for priorities, so it should not be a rush 15:10:34 edleafe: that said, I think that bumping RPC version would be -1 for a FFE 15:10:44 edleafe: because that's something huge 15:11:08 bauzas: that's one reason I put that patch first initially 15:11:27 edleafe: yeah but I said, I don't want to have half methods 15:11:51 bauzas: it was a single patch 15:12:06 splitting it into two means one has to go first :) 15:12:15 edleafe: so let's cross fingers and see what can be merged before Thursday but that sounds really risky 15:12:34 bauzas, could you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148904/ - hans asked a question about service + compute_node 15:12:55 PaulMurray: sure it's in my pipe 15:13:04 bauzas, would like to get it sorted today 15:13:18 PaulMurray: okay, let's do this just after the meeting 15:13:26 bauzas, k 15:14:33 OK, anything else specific or should we all go back and review code? 15:15:33 code! 15:15:44 ok, then the action is... 15:15:55 #action review the patches on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking 15:16:04 seriously, reviewing ? :) 15:16:15 and we'll talk again next week 15:16:23 code, review, adverties to core what can be review~ 15:16:55 tnx everyone, we know what to do 15:16:58 #endmeeting