14:00:16 #startmeeting fwaas 14:00:17 Meeting started Tue Jul 11 14:00:16 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SridarK_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:20 Hi 14:00:21 The meeting name has been set to 'fwaas' 14:00:31 #chair yushiro xgerman_ 14:00:32 Current chairs: SridarK_ xgerman_ yushiro 14:00:41 I think today my turn ? 14:00:47 o/ 14:01:03 Hi 14:01:07 ok lets get started 14:01:12 SridarK_, yes :) 14:01:18 hi all o/ 14:01:38 #topic Pike 14:01:58 lets start of with L2 support 14:02:26 chandanc: welcome back - i know u had a sort of unplanned PTO 14:02:39 chandanc: thx for keeping us informed 14:02:43 ya SridarK_ , i am back and catching up 14:02:43 welcome back chandanc :) 14:02:58 thanks yushiro 14:03:08 chandanc: yes perhaps we can discuss next steps and a plan 14:03:16 I think we have to discuss and close on the race condition part 14:03:24 yes sure 14:03:25 chandanc: yes 14:04:08 So i think the changes are need on the l2 extension to pass some info to the driver 14:04:14 we also need to see where things are with neutron SG using ovs - i am not sure if that change has been effected ? 14:04:36 chandanc: yes 14:05:04 So i was thinking of investigating the required changes 14:05:17 lets do some discussion and then we can plan for a time to do some debugging and deeper dive offline 14:05:23 SrisarK_ should we ping kevinb? 14:05:29 I will send it to yushiro for review and comments 14:05:29 chandanc: pls go ahead 14:05:43 chandanc, OK 14:05:59 xgerman_: yes i think that is good too - but irrespective - we can always do the support on ovs 14:06:11 agreed 14:06:23 so if someone needs to do SG and FWaaS L2 - then they shd do ovs 14:06:24 sorry , late ... 14:06:39 SridarK_: , xgerman_ is there any change in the design 14:06:42 reedip_, welcome 14:06:48 am i missing something ? 14:06:58 and we will call out SG iptables and FWaaS L2 as an unsupported configuration 14:07:09 chandanc: no sorry 14:07:16 ok 14:07:22 no change - i was just wondering on neutron state 14:07:34 i hope i clarified ^^^ 14:07:38 Sure SridarK_ 14:07:42 chandanc: pls go ahead 14:08:34 i still need to come up with the exact patch, i will send it this week 14:08:53 chandanc: ok 14:10:12 chandanc: other things u want to discuss ? 14:10:30 Sorry, i dont have any other update 14:10:43 I am mostly catching up 14:10:56 chandanc: ok thx - and lets plan to discuss more during the week 14:11:05 sure SridarK_ 14:11:22 we can use the fwaas channel - this time will work for most of us 14:11:38 yushiro: pls go ahead on l2 agent 14:11:53 SridarK_, yes 14:11:56 ok Sure 14:12:27 In this week, unfortunately I didn't have any update on this. 14:12:42 I and reedip_ still retrieving https://review.openstack.org/#/c/478719/ 14:13:06 and frankly , I am getting bored with this patch :( 14:13:23 we are not able to arrive at a proper conclusion :( 14:13:30 yushiro: no worries - lets plan for some time this week - i am sure there is some plugin tweaks needed too 14:13:59 reedip_: sigh yes 14:14:14 reedip_, I know your feelings.. I'll do it instead of you! please rest at sun-shade :) 14:14:16 reedip_: i think these are mostly small nits - so hopefully we can converge 14:14:46 yushiro : I have a patch almost ready .... let me push it 14:14:47 reedip_: i am quite open on this esp since v1 stuff will get out soon (or so we think) 14:15:06 the problem is neutron-lib migration is all tied up with this patch 14:15:15 and I am not comfortable because of that 14:15:25 yeah, I think getting the migration has a huge priority 14:15:46 xgerman_ : Yep .... 14:15:56 indeed. In addition, we cannot handle 'Depends-On' tag into neutron-lib. 14:16:11 yes, got that rom boden 14:16:22 In order to rebase, we should merge neutron-lib ASAP. 14:16:29 +1 14:16:46 reedip_, again, thanks for your update. 14:17:32 reedip_: we might as well cover other neutron-lib related stuff here 14:17:38 other things u want to add ? 14:17:53 that's all from me 14:17:56 Nope , all things are stuck with this. I can push all other stuff if this goes out 14:18:11 reedip_ how is that testing going 14:18:16 its like the Elephant's trunk is stuck .... if the trunk goes out then the elephant can move 14:18:29 xgerman_ I am checking the experimental for Fullstack 14:18:47 I am not able to debug why the folder is being picked up for Neutron and not neutron-fwaas 14:18:48 ok, I know we need that for stadium compliance and it has been lingering 14:19:09 oh, ok, thank you for looking into that 14:19:43 seeing stuff from njohnston reminds me how long we have been working on something 14:19:55 yeah ... :( 14:19:59 :( 14:20:08 I miss him a lot on this 14:20:14 hey hi njohnston :) 14:20:22 o/ 14:20:23 Hi all! 14:20:23 hello there njohnston: yes defn miss u here 14:20:24 njohnston, long time no see :) 14:20:44 I miss you all very much. 14:20:46 note that the next week is the Final release for non-client libraries https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule.html#p-final-lib 14:21:57 amotoki: so that is our target then to get all of this wrapped up 14:22:06 amotoki, thanks for your information.. 14:22:40 reedip_: so lets see if we can get this next version in 14:22:47 sound good. you already keep it in mind. 14:23:21 can we say that fullstack is a lower priority ? 14:23:23 so neutron-lib is one of them ? ( Just confirming ) 14:23:30 i can do the final clean up for the neutron-lib patch if you are okay 14:23:37 reedip_: yes, neutron-lib is non-client lib 14:24:41 amotoki : sure, my patch is almost ready. Let me push it and if you find anything worng, please help out 14:24:50 reedip_: once the exception PS is in, do u feel comfortable abt undoing the revert of the api defn by this deadline ? 14:25:01 if we can get that in that will be good 14:25:13 +1 14:25:14 SridarK_ : I will try my best 14:25:26 reedip_: okay. but make sure to run simple check like pep8 and py27 to save time and for fast iteration 14:25:27 reedip_: thx much for ur persistence and effort 14:25:32 SridarK_ : Cores would take care of the rest :) 14:25:43 amotoki: yes... I will 14:26:15 yeah, ping me if we need to lobby Neutron people 14:26:27 ok so we have our immediate priorities and focus set on helping with getting neutron-lib stuff in 14:26:43 sure 14:27:04 reedip_: are u in sync with yamamoto as well so we are sure we are good with midonet 14:27:29 SridarK_ yamamoto pushed the Non Voting Midonet patch for FwaaS 14:27:33 reedip_: i know he has been reviewing but just to be sure 14:27:37 so once that patch is merged, we can have our tests 14:27:44 reedip_: ok perfect 14:27:44 and test midonet with fwaas 14:27:54 sounds good 14:28:38 reedip_: ok i think we have covered all things 14:28:42 shall we move on ? 14:29:00 OK 14:29:32 #topic Horizon 14:29:44 SarathMekala: amotoki: pls go ahead 14:29:59 amotoki: thx for all ur help here 14:30:06 hi all.. I am working on amotoki's review comments 14:30:34 as the final clean up of the fwaas v1 dashboard, I proposed a patch to import policy.json for the dashboard. 14:31:01 I will put in a patch by tomorrow 14:31:08 in related to this, rob found insert_rule/remove_rule still live in the neutron. 14:31:37 fwaas-dashobard https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481867/ 14:31:57 and the policy one is bug 1703347 14:31:58 bug 1703347 in neutron "insert_rule/remove_rule in policy.json should be moved to neutron-fwaas" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1703347 - Assigned to Akihiro Motoki (amotoki) 14:32:54 I would like to release fwaas-dashboard for v1 next week. until then, I would like to merge patches from Adit. 14:33:37 sounds good 14:33:57 if one of fwaas-core give +2, I will merge dashboard patches as my hat of horizon-core. only self-approve is not a good idea :( 14:34:12 link? 14:34:15 amotoki, ping me !!! 14:34:27 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard+branch:master 14:34:30 not so special. 14:35:15 amotoki: ok 14:35:15 SarathMekala: is there anything i can help you? 14:36:01 amotoki can you do one round of testing with the UI 14:36:37 integration with devstack is one more area you can pitch in 14:36:38 SarathMekala: do you mean unit test or testing with devstack (with fwaas v2) ? 14:36:47 testing with devstack 14:36:56 SarathMekala: okay, i can post devstack plugin support first 14:37:09 cool.. that will help the team as well 14:37:16 In addition, I verified v1 work well with devstack along with amotoki :-) 14:38:12 hoangcx, thanks for your help. 14:39:35 that's all from me. 14:39:43 any other things to discuss SarathMekala ? 14:40:00 nothing more from my side 14:40:17 sorry my progress is a bit slow.. i got pulled into a new project and am ramping up 14:40:35 happens to the best of us 14:40:52 sigh that is life for most of us .. 14:41:04 :p 14:41:13 :) 14:41:25 but the next few weeks are critical 14:41:34 ok lets move on 14:42:08 doude: do u want to discuss ur patch on the pluggable backend ? 14:42:30 yes 14:42:44 #topic pluggable backend 14:42:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/480265 14:43:04 doude: pls go ahead 14:43:20 I proposed a first draft that rework the code organisation to enable pugable service driver backend 14:43:32 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480265/ 14:44:02 I did not rework the unit tests as I prefer to have you first impression before 14:44:18 doude: i have been looking at this - this was long overdue 14:45:12 I propose a driver API interface where which drivers have to inherites 14:45:21 i am not sure on the timing of things if we can make Pike - but my opinion is that we can continue with reviews 14:45:33 ok 14:45:36 +1 14:45:52 doude, please add me as a reviewer :) 14:46:03 doude: i think there will be some interest from ODL folks too 14:46:22 should I hang it until Pike release or will you be able to make some reviews? 14:46:51 doude: if u have the bandwidth - lets keep this moving 14:47:12 yushiro: I'll 14:47:13 for Pike i think we need to settle some of the other high priority pieces 14:47:51 ok, but rebasing is painful work with that type of patch 14:48:03 doude: yes understood 14:48:21 we will have some neutron-lib related churn too 14:48:39 i think once we absorb that - it will not be too bad 14:48:53 about deprecating the v1, do you mean the code will be removed? 14:48:57 doude: but ur choice if u want to hang on for a bit - 14:49:19 I'll try to maintain it 14:49:25 and starting to rework UT 14:49:44 we have been talking abt removing v1 code for some time now - possibly by the R release 14:50:29 ok so I have to maintain it in that patch 14:50:35 I mean take care of it 14:50:52 doude: ok - we can continue to discuss this and possibly try to get this in early for R 14:51:04 doude: is v1 support very critical for u ? 14:51:31 you mean for me as a user? 14:51:48 doude: yes 14:51:59 no no, I don't use it 14:52:07 doude: ok cool 14:52:20 I asked because it's easier to develop that patch without maintain it 14:52:30 doude: ok makes sense 14:53:08 ok i added yushiro also to the PS - we will look at it and discuss more 14:53:14 doude: thx 14:53:30 if nothing else lets move on 14:53:48 ok 14:53:51 doude, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460732/ here is a patch which describes about support term for v1 14:54:04 #topic Open Discussion 14:54:05 thanks yushiro 14:54:16 Sydney summit CFP 14:54:23 last date 14th July 14:54:44 that submission system is buggy so start early… 14:54:49 reedip_: yes indeed - my take is that we dont have much more to show from Boston 14:54:51 :D 14:55:09 we were thinking about some lab but I couldn;t find a lab option 14:55:17 (and then there is the issue with funding) 14:55:18 3 days left for deadline .... 14:55:23 i am all for it if we can do a lab 14:55:27 that would be useful 14:55:32 +1 14:55:41 in terms of a talk i am a bit skeptical 14:56:18 I am skeptical they will have enough speakers and hence have a low bar 14:56:31 but lets shoot some topics around 14:56:38 I have added a paper with Yushiro for IoT with TaaS and FWaaS 14:56:42 on IRC or email 14:56:44 from security point of view 14:56:47 reedip_: +1 14:56:55 +1 14:57:06 I am trying to create a PoC, if it works, then we can have some buy in 14:57:15 if it is accepted :D 14:57:18 :) 14:57:38 if i can use that to monitor my sprinkler system securely - i will be very happy :-) 14:57:51 PTG ? 14:57:53 SridarK_ thats the dream, right ??? 14:57:58 :-) 14:58:10 I didnt get a rejection for Travel Support, so lets see 14:58:12 I will be able to make it to the PTG 14:58:21 if it is approved, then I might be able to come to PTG 14:58:33 ok grt 14:58:53 I don't get TSP from foundation. So, now I'm negotiating with my manager for PTG. 14:59:04 all the best yushiro 14:59:09 +1 14:59:16 final deadline is 10th August I think :) 14:59:21 i think neutron folks haven't got response for TSP 14:59:21 worst case - we can do a virtual PTG 14:59:28 me either 14:59:37 amotoki, wow, are you??? 14:59:48 budgets are really tight now 15:00:07 oops we are at time 15:00:12 I'd like to buy warp system :) 15:00:16 see the time budget also ran out :P 15:00:17 some reminder: doc-migration patches https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-fwaas+branch:master+topic:doc-migration 15:00:17 thx all for joining and have a grt week 15:00:28 amotoki: +1 sorry forgot abt that 15:00:34 thx for the reminder 15:00:36 SridarK_: np 15:00:40 * EmilienM notices that fwaas are chatty 15:00:43 #endmeeting