14:00:13 #startmeeting fwaas 14:00:14 Meeting started Tue May 16 14:00:13 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is yushiro. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'fwaas' 14:00:28 o/ 14:00:37 #chair SridarK yushiro xgerman njohnston 14:00:41 Warning: Nick not in channel: SridarK 14:00:42 Warning: Nick not in channel: njohnston 14:00:43 Current chairs: SridarK njohnston xgerman yushiro 14:01:01 o/ 14:01:24 SridarK is not here. OK, let's start. 14:01:34 yep, let’s start 14:01:44 #topic Pike 14:02:02 yushiro : Reference page is the same ? 14:02:22 oh, let’s talk summit at the end then 14:02:28 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fwaas-meeting ?? 14:02:38 Hi All sorry to be late 14:02:38 #chair SridarK_ 14:02:39 Warning: Nick not in channel: SridarK_ 14:02:40 Current chairs: SridarK SridarK_ njohnston xgerman yushiro 14:02:58 there is no Sridark .... :) 14:02:58 reedip_, yes, 14:03:10 SridarK, Hi, good timing :) 14:03:15 +! 14:03:16 sorry 14:03:23 i forget who is to run today ? 14:03:38 *run the mtg 14:03:54 SridarK, xgerman I forgot :) 14:03:59 me, too 14:04:03 :-) 14:04:14 can one of u run today ? 14:04:20 sure 14:04:22 and we can start the sched with that 14:04:32 i am multitasking 14:04:40 who isn’t those days :-) 14:04:41 Currently I just moved 'Pike' topic. 14:04:44 :-) 14:05:00 ok, let’s talk Pike - summit at the end 14:05:07 sounds good 14:05:07 yes, please. 14:05:23 also we will be missing chandanc and SarathMekala today 14:05:33 chandanc is probab on a plane headed back 14:05:43 SarathMekala had a conflict 14:06:05 so possibly we can run thru quickly 14:06:14 reedip_: welcome back and congrats again 14:06:29 SridarK : Yesp and I missed you guys too :D 14:06:38 :-) 14:06:42 reedip_, meeee tooo :) 14:06:50 +1 14:08:08 Ok, so where are we with Pike? 14:08:32 We decided a few things: 14:08:48 - two RPC topics -> L2, L3 14:09:04 which we debugged for the demo :- 14:09:09 :-) 14:09:32 How was the demo ? Any videos on youtube? 14:09:42 yep, we have a video 14:09:53 reedip_: went well, we can discuss on that topic 14:10:08 k great 14:10:47 #decision to focus on L2 without SG co-exiatsnce for now 14:12:58 I don’t think with the summit we made much progress (other than that we got it to work) 14:13:37 yes we were defn busy with multiple things 14:13:57 but according to chandanc things are in decent shape 14:14:10 on the ovs transition 14:14:17 and target for Pike-2 14:15:26 yes 14:19:25 +1 14:19:33 anyhting else on that topic? 14:20:23 no i think thats all, with that and L2 Agent, DFWG changes we should be good 14:20:39 things do work - but some bugs and focus on UT needed 14:20:52 SridarK, indeed. 14:22:17 #topic FWaaS v2 14:22:48 I don’t think we have much to add what we didn;t already discuss in Pike 14:23:07 +1 14:23:25 xgerman, yes. I should fix some minor bug about FirewallGroupPortAssociation control. 14:23:26 DId we drop the mail to deprecate fwaas V1 ? 14:24:08 it’s been deprecated for years 14:24:20 xgerman : you got what I meant :) 14:24:27 I'll update L2 agent patch tomorrow.(Now editting a little) 14:24:45 yep, we announced at summit - e-mail is still outstanding 14:24:56 we also had people ask us about migration strategy 14:25:07 xgerman : and the response ? 14:25:40 yes we had a good discussion with some operators 14:26:00 they would like to see some help with the migration from v1 to v2 14:26:18 there was a neutron services pain points session 14:26:50 so tentatively the plan is to see if we can help them with some scripts to migrate 14:27:09 _not_ anything in terms of alembic but rather bash scripts 14:28:03 we've just been suggested to provide migration 'script' at that time. 14:28:15 yeah, they don’t like to recreate the FW; there is even an operator with a ton of FWaaS V1 firewalls and he is very keen on the migration scripts 14:29:38 but I think before we announce it officially we need to have more ducks in a row 14:30:01 because operators are quick with complaining on a ML 14:30:31 So I think this is something we need to track , fwaasv1 migration to v2 14:31:18 +1 in our discussion - we said we will help with scripts - i think they are fine with any help 14:31:37 +1+1 14:31:42 we don’t think FWaaS V1 and V2 can run on the same system so we need to have a migration strategy which doesn’t exposes the network… 14:31:44 but to xgerman - u are absolutely right we dont want to land up in a messy situation 14:32:15 yep, we should aim to have an announcement before the Pike release… 14:32:17 ok, lets discuss it on the fwaas channel/email/ML 14:32:47 yushiro /xgerman/SridarK : care to put out an action for this item" 14:32:50 ?? 14:33:09 #action investigate FWaaS V1 -> V2 migration strategy 14:33:17 i will start a conversation with the operator 14:33:18 xgerman, reedip_ thanks :) 14:33:25 who brought it up 14:33:30 thanks 14:33:32 i will have u guys in the cc 14:33:38 Yeah :) 14:33:53 yes, sounds good. 14:33:56 he mentioned they have a customer who is using it a lot 14:33:59 and they are quite happy 14:34:04 so that was the good news 14:35:26 :) 14:36:23 indeed 14:36:49 #topic Stadium Compliance 14:37:18 kevinb had a comment on our fullstack regarding us setting up a “test-gate” 14:39:03 Yeah, the one thing I was asking 14:39:08 was confused by the points 14:42:03 ok, probably best to ask in the Neutron channel somebody who knows gates better than me 14:42:15 #topic performance improvement 14:42:29 There was some discussion if we can backport to Ocata or not 14:43:13 and what we got xgerman? 14:45:39 well, none of us has +2 on the old branches so we need to convicne the Neutron people 14:46:01 I see.. 14:46:46 hmm... 14:47:07 xgerman, maybe i misunderstood, did you mean you had some discussion about the backport in Boston? 14:47:23 or comment of Ihar on this ps https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458434/ 14:47:34 yeah, I am referring to that comment 14:47:44 okay 14:47:58 I didn’t discuss but maybe the others had a chance… 14:48:10 I also replied what I and hoangcx discussed 14:49:27 atm, i don't see any feedback from Ihar yet, let us try to ping him again 14:50:25 we are also investigating solution for v2 and SG in neutron 14:50:30 we will update later 14:50:37 that's it for perf improvement 14:52:41 if no one has any comment, we can move on 14:52:47 < 10 minutes left 14:52:48 ok, sounds good 14:53:03 #action cuongnv ping ihar about backport 14:53:10 #topic Summit 14:53:25 hi folks 14:53:31 hi 14:53:36 hi 14:53:46 sorry I missed this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458723/ 14:54:06 please review this 14:54:10 Talk and demo went well - some good discussions post talk as well 14:54:12 k 14:54:26 aah, I was thinking about this vks1 , this needs to be tested once. I will test it tomorrow morning and get back to u 14:54:29 vks1, sure 14:54:42 thanks 14:55:00 #link https://youtu.be/9Wkym4BeM4M 14:55:08 that’s the talk video 14:56:34 we also had a meeting and have a photo 14:56:51 :) 14:57:09 :-) 14:57:18 sheesh , missed 14:57:29 I will practice to speak English :-) 14:57:32 guys, as its almost time, I raised a request in the neutron-fwaas channel 14:57:34 reedip_: like u did not have something better to do 14:57:55 if someone has some time, please provide me some advice 14:58:11 SridarK : no comments ... she is behind me! 14:58:34 reedip_: sorry can u shoot me an email - i have to run to another mtg and will be offline for some time during the day 14:59:03 SridarK : for the patch, I will, no issues 14:59:11 reedip_, sure 14:59:15 1 minute 14:59:25 thanks a lot for the time.. its been a long time since I attended the meeting... feels good to be back 14:59:38 glad to have you back ;-) 15:00:05 :) 15:00:08 time's up 15:00:39 seee youuu 15:00:42 bye all 15:00:45 bye all 15:00:49 have a great week 15:00:52 #endmeeting