16:07:15 #startmeeting Fuel 16:07:16 Meeting started Thu Oct 23 16:07:15 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kozhukalov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:07:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:07:20 The meeting name has been set to 'fuel' 16:07:31 #chair kozhukalov 16:07:32 Current chairs: kozhukalov 16:07:44 #topic multiple L2 nets (rmoe) 16:07:45 xarses: so what's up with library part? any major issues / blockers? 16:07:51 topic is still the same 16:07:51 CI still shows -1 there 16:08:06 mihgen: it will because it requires the nailgun changes to work 16:08:22 oh ok 16:08:44 so what's the overall feeling how far it's from being completed? 16:09:00 some feedback from the last demo is here : https://mirantis.jira.com/wiki/display/PRD/Multiple+L2+networks+support+in+CLI 16:09:21 fungi: thanx for your note about meetbot 16:09:50 mihgen: we should be able to have the bvt tests sorted in the next day or tow. So we are looking for reviewers so that we can merge as soon as possible 16:10:00 s/tow/two 16:10:32 xarses: ok thx 16:10:52 #topic stats collection (akislitsky) 16:11:58 we have almost all backend changes in Nailgun for statistics. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130518/ on review and we need to add more tasks tracking. ISO with changes is built and QA team test it. Also QA guys work on load testing of statistics collector. We still have number of issues on the collector side: river for Elasticsearch is not works with migrating Postgresql json fields, so we are implementing own migrati 16:11:58 on tool now. UI opt-in, opt-out pages are one review and UI for analytics reports are on the review too: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130238/. Now we are testing whole dataflow of statistics and investigate possibility to use OpenStack API for collecting number of tenants and vms 16:13:01 akislitsky: sounds good 16:13:08 any news from devops part of the deal? 16:13:50 basically a few things - stats collector deployment after each commit merge for QA/Dev purposes 16:13:59 mihgen: we almost done 16:14:05 official deployment 16:14:15 mihgen: we have VMs, manual setup and manifests is a go 16:14:21 and deployment public machine for community to see stats of Fuel usage 16:14:44 teran: where can we look for manifests? 16:14:58 packages are under OSCI team and AFAIK they're working 16:15:09 what packages? 16:15:14 mihgen: when they'll be done in review.f-i.org 16:15:22 mihgen: for production deployment 16:15:32 teran: can I review those? 16:15:38 where they are now? 16:16:27 mihgen: I need to ask OSCI team first 16:17:18 rvyalov: ^^^ ? 16:17:50 from qa side: guys are creating env for tests and tuning ytank for it 16:17:51 how osci is related actually? 16:18:08 teran: do you need a repo for it or what 16:18:36 nurla: that's good, thanks! 16:18:40 mihgen: nope, we have deb-repo where we're planning to store those packages 16:19:01 we have ytank tests on review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130468/ 16:19:03 mihgen: from OSCI we need simply packages to be built 16:19:15 teran: simple question, where is the puppet deployment code 16:19:17 review 16:19:23 which I can go over and -1 ;) 16:19:43 mihgen: lol :) 16:20:01 mihgen: AlexanderC working on it 16:20:12 mihgen: review will be created soon 16:20:18 monester_laptop: please share once it's done 16:20:26 let's move on 16:20:36 yea 16:20:49 #topic gerrit for linux code at review.fuel-infra.org (rvyalov) 16:21:20 we deploy new gerrit instance. we moved all non openstack packages and openstack specs to new gerrit instance 16:21:48 rvyalov: is there a link to see all the repos at once? 16:22:07 mihgen review.fuel-infra.org 16:22:28 please see Projects->lists 16:22:32 rvyalov: do we have moved all CI's and other building stuff there? 16:23:05 it is in progress 16:23:32 rvyalov: ETA? 16:23:48 maybe 7.0 16:24:01 :O 16:24:01 cool 16:24:19 not optimistic 16:24:33 let's move it earlier 16:24:35 moving on? 16:24:43 let's discuss it later, yeah 16:25:00 #topic image based provisioning (agordeev) 16:25:03 hi 16:25:08 agordeev: hi 16:25:21 at least image based provisioning itself works on both ubuntu and centOS systems. yay! 16:25:31 few patchsets to fuel-main are still required to be merged someway to build the iso featured IBP 16:25:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103821/ 16:25:56 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125421/ 16:26:00 and fuel-web 16:26:06 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130284/ 16:26:06 afaik there are some mirror related issues 16:26:17 more detailed status: 16:26:23 centos seems to be very close to become completely operatable. QA reported that most of deploing/system tests passed. 16:26:38 agordeev: cool 16:26:40 so, expecting appearing a lot of bugs in forceeable future 16:26:51 ubuntu still needs more love. Few packages in mirror are still broken, cloud-init under question, need investigation and deeper dive. Hope to be finished before the next week ends 16:27:12 agordeev: * more love 16:27:15 cool 16:27:15 agordeev: that's pretty good news 16:27:29 I hope we can give required love to ubuntu by end of next week 16:27:37 =) 16:27:47 or it will be love us 16:27:53 agordeev: thanx, sounds good 16:28:01 nurla: and enable systests for it too 16:28:11 at least 1 test per OS 16:28:39 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126909/ 16:28:42 Andrey hes review alreeady for imp 16:28:55 kozhukalov: thx 16:29:03 this is PR for making it possible to launch system tests 16:29:09 kozhukalov: it's not exactly what I wanted 16:29:18 while we will be still running on cobbler everything 16:29:27 I just want to add a few tests to run image-based 16:29:45 it'll be next step in testing 16:29:47 with your patch you will be able to run cobbler OR image-based, but not together 16:30:06 ok, I hope next step is coming sooner ;) 16:30:24 mihgen: yes) 16:30:26 ok, moving on then? 16:30:46 yeah 16:30:50 #topic diff upgrade tarball (kozhukalov) 16:31:34 make part is ready and locally tested https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124734/ 16:31:39 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124734/ 16:31:57 I've built 5.1->6.0 tarball 16:32:16 and it turned out that ubuntu repo reduced 8 times 16:32:33 while centos is twice as small as original one 16:33:01 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/128323/ 16:33:10 this patch is ready to be merged 16:33:19 there are 3 +1 16:33:34 kozhukalov: anything else needed except these patches to be merged to complete the feature? 16:33:43 tomorrow planning to start testing actual upgrade 16:34:10 spec is still needs to be reviewed 16:34:19 sorry, did not have enough time 16:34:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121591/ 16:34:53 I think that is it 16:35:05 ah, forget 16:35:30 of course we need DevOps cooperation for making jenkins jobs 16:35:42 for building diff upgrade tarballs 16:36:04 who is working from devops side on this? 16:36:14 still noone 16:36:22 will ask them tomorrow 16:36:32 teran: will you assign someone? we need it sooner than later 16:36:49 the reason is that make part was made yesterday night 16:36:55 mihgen: SergeyK is working on it © teran 16:37:09 ok 16:37:53 ok, moving on 16:37:54 #topic move fuel development docs to fuel-docs update (aedo) 16:38:00 christopheraedo: ^^^ 16:38:08 I am in the final stages of moving the Fuel development documentation from fuel-web repo into fuel-docs repo. 16:38:11 This blueprint has the associated commit proposals 16:38:14 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-dev-docs-merge-fuel-docs 16:38:17 Right now the Fuel CI server is failing commit proposal 125234 because the dependencies for building Fuel documentation have changed. The devops team will need to adjust the fuel-docs build environment to accomodate this. 16:38:21 All necessary dependencies are installed by running the script prep_doc_build_env.sh included in 16:38:24 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124551/ 16:38:53 At this point, probably need most attention from devops side to get fuel-docs passing CI again, but other reviewers of the proposed commits would not hurt either 16:39:27 bookwar_: teran can you help with that thing? ^^^ 16:39:39 mihgen: sure, we can 16:40:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125234/ 16:40:10 this one should be fixed? 16:40:34 Yes - that's the one 16:40:52 Issue is that to build docs now, it clones fuel-web in order to do autodoc API documentation 16:41:25 so fuel-docs environment needs the same dependencies that used to be required to build docs under fuel-web/docs (i.e. nailgun stuff) 16:42:10 teran: will you help or someone from your team? 16:42:24 christopheraedo: let's continue this discussion in fuel-dev and fix the deps then 16:42:36 bookwar_: sounds good 16:42:52 christopheraedo: thanks for working on this, looking forward to see it merged 16:43:01 ok, moving on then? 16:43:07 me too! 16:43:15 #topic building openstack from master (brain461) 16:43:23 Hello everyone 16:43:27 Entire feature is on its final stages. RPM part - already merged. 16:43:30 Updated feature spec for 6.0 is on review - you're welcome to provide input 16:43:34 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121116/ 16:43:38 OpenStack deb building make system part is on development stage - corrections were proposed by kozhukalov. 16:43:42 I hope to finish preparing it for review tomorrow. 16:43:47 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129314/ 16:43:54 Note: we could start attempting to build community ISO when deb building part is ready 16:44:39 thanks brain461 16:45:03 bookwar_: do you think we can start creating jenkins job which can build ISO with vanilla openstack? 16:45:12 even centos for now to start would be fine 16:46:26 mihgen: no problems with that, we need to discuss a bit more where to put it 16:46:45 mihgen: you mean vanilla master openstack, right? 16:46:48 bookwar_: ok, let's do it 16:47:02 teran: we probably should start with stable/juno 16:47:18 brain461: rvyalov: or we can go ahead with master? 16:47:55 we could try, but I'm not sure if will work out of the box, some corrections to specs could be required 16:48:44 brain461: ok, let's go step by step and start with stable/juno then 16:49:11 we probably should start with stable/juno since that may be a target for many people, and then later also run master 16:49:42 ok, looks like we have nothing more in agenda to discuss 16:49:56 #topic Free discussion 16:50:00 just a reminder where we are in the development cycle 16:50:02 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/6.0_Release_Schedule 16:50:10 we are one week before feature freeze 16:50:44 so let's hurry up with feature-merging, but keep attention to bugs too - we can't allow our BVTs to be broken for more than couple of days 16:51:12 mihgen: how can we merge features if bvt's are broken at all? 16:51:17 we've fixed bvt today, so next 6.0 build shoud be green 16:51:48 xarses: not at all. teran - can you start sooner our public nightly builds? 16:52:13 so we can see green sooner unless we broke again by merging neutron upstream manifests 16:52:45 which I'm happy actually to see merged! thanks both xarses and xenolog for hard work on those patches for almost 2 months if not more.. 16:52:59 speaking of neutron, wasn't it reverted or was it merged again? 16:53:10 mihgen: yeah, we'll try. AFAIK we have building packages during the build already merged 16:53:36 xarses: reverted first to make BVTs green first, then merged once BVTs passed as green 16:53:46 bogdando: can you confirm it's fully merged? 16:53:49 ok 16:54:55 yep, looks merged 16:54:58 * xarses does a dance 16:55:08 :) 16:55:29 cool, ending? 16:55:46 yeah - thanks folks! see you next week 16:55:46 thanx everyone 16:55:51 great meeting 16:55:58 #endmeeting