16:00:58 #startmeeting Fuel 16:00:59 Meeting started Thu Jul 3 16:00:58 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vkozhukalov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:03 The meeting name has been set to 'fuel' 16:01:07 #chair vkozhukalov 16:01:08 Current chairs: vkozhukalov 16:01:18 Hi 16:01:22 hi 16:01:26 #topic Greetings, announcements 16:01:40 who is here? 16:01:59 o/ 16:02:19 hi there 16:02:56 #topic bug squashing day results 16:03:17 as usual agenda is here 16:03:22 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda 16:03:42 angdraug around? 16:04:16 vkozhukalov: here 16:04:32 we didn't have bug squashing day this week 16:04:35 can you share any details about squashing day? 16:04:49 results of normal day to day bug squashing are at the same place: 16:05:15 #link https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/spreadsheets/d/10mUeRwOplnmoe_RFkrUSeVEw-__ZMU2nq23BOY-gzYs/edit#gid=66519680 16:05:22 ok 16:05:30 #topic 5.0.1 release status 16:06:49 We have several critical bugs with upgrades in 5.0.1. Most of them will be addressed today 16:07:34 this bug will not be fixed today. #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1336350 16:07:36 Launchpad bug 1336350 in fuel/5.1.x "[Update] status bar do not show progress after update/rollback" [High,Confirmed] 16:08:14 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1336350 16:08:34 hash tag must be in the beginning of the line 16:09:01 also we have several other bugfixes on review, they will be merged tomorrow 16:09:17 the plan is to announce code freeze for 5.0.1 as soon as upgrades are ready 16:09:27 and we have ostf issues. plan is to merge fixes tomorrow 16:09:33 not tomorrow, today 16:09:50 dpyzhov: is #1336350 the only blocker that won't be fixed today? 16:10:31 angdraug: the only blocker in upgrades 16:10:45 #link https://launchpad.net/fuel/+milestone/5.0.1 16:11:07 the only other critical bug that I see there is #1308684 16:11:23 it has fixes on review already 16:11:52 we have broken master right now 16:12:04 so we can not test and backport fix 16:12:20 it will be backported tomorrow in the first half of the day 16:12:29 and we will create rc1 tomorrow 16:12:41 ok 16:12:56 ok, moving? 16:13:03 yes 16:13:10 #topic Feature freeze on 5.1 16:13:32 again i believe dpyzhov has some info 16:13:50 We have one more week before feature freeze 16:14:04 In order to finish several features 16:14:29 But this mean that features should be merged no later then Monday 16:14:34 great, everyone is glad 16:14:46 We don’t want to be in hurry next Thursday 16:15:01 Some of features will not be ready by Monday 16:15:10 you mean not merged but on review, right? 16:15:31 vkozhukalov: just do not postpone till Thursday 16:15:44 As soon as possible 16:15:49 dpyzhov: that is clear 16:16:03 dpyzhov: one more week is enough 16:16:04 Yes, code on review on Monday is mandatory 16:16:42 afaik you have detailed status for every feature 16:17:08 which of them are risky? 16:17:26 ml2 is still at risk 16:17:43 it's on agenda for later 16:18:15 also lsi in on high risk 16:18:16 ok, let's move on and ask details about ml2 a bit later 16:18:29 #topic Feature statuses 16:18:30 and qemu update needs investigations 16:18:43 #topic Install OpenStack from upstream 16:18:54 hello everyone 16:18:58 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/openstack-from-master 16:19:03 code is merged into master already. as soon as public gerrit is setup and repos are created, feature will be available to all customers 16:19:04 brain461: hello 16:19:48 does it work? ) 16:19:57 yes 16:19:58 great, that it is ready 16:20:15 any other details? concerns? 16:20:17 haven't tested deployments though 16:20:37 none 16:20:57 but you are going to, right? 16:21:13 QA part is still not implemented 16:21:32 I expect help from our qa team in that regard 16:21:37 QA/CI is in scope, right? 16:21:59 yes, there will be tests for every component 16:22:06 great 16:22:13 moving 16:22:18 running Fuel CI on top of that is essential 16:22:33 #topic ML2: blueprints status and implementation 16:22:56 xarses: please share your status 16:23:15 ML2 from Upstream - Still work in progress, Ubuntu Single mode passes cluster building, Ubuntu HA is about to pass cluster building. Sill need to finish with new create networks (written/not tested) and plug in last few settings from nailgun to configure agents 16:23:15 Packages where missing for CentOS 16:23:15 We need to discuss better version of OVS if possible 16:23:15 #link https://lists.launchpad.net/fuel-dev/msg01272.html 16:23:50 I rearranged blueprints 16:24:13 now 16:24:16 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/neutron-ml2-plugin-in-fuel-51 16:24:20 is targeted for 5-1 16:24:29 and being implemented for 5.1 16:24:35 not a very good name for a blueprint 16:24:46 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/ml2-neutron 16:24:52 is now targeted to 6.0 16:25:00 we achieved this agreement 16:25:10 what agreement? 16:25:11 and this blueprint shows how it is gonna be in 5.1 16:25:13 link? 16:25:18 what agreement? 16:25:27 that if xarses approach does not work 16:25:36 I mean the one with neutron upstream full merge 16:25:49 then we start parallel implementation 16:25:54 xenolog started it 16:26:01 and this implementation differs a bit 16:26:05 yes, but it still doesn't pass CI 16:26:36 it is almost ready 16:26:50 it will be merged tomorrow I hope 16:26:53 that's what xarses is saying above :) 16:27:32 yep, but is much more complete than xarses approach 16:28:16 I don't know, it doesn't even have a spec in the BP 16:28:43 that's why I created a BP 16:28:44 If the approach was not complete then it should have been raised in the spec review, which still isn't approved 16:29:29 lets move on 16:29:33 but, there is no spec on review, right? 16:29:37 it is 16:29:48 there is for ml2-neutron 16:29:52 i just posted a link 16:29:54 #link https://review.openstack.org/99807 16:29:58 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/neutron-ml2-plugin-in-fuel-51 16:30:10 aglarendil: that's a link to BP, link to spec in the BP is not set 16:30:31 it will be ready tomorrow 16:30:38 I know guys, it is a bit messy 16:30:52 sorry for that 16:31:05 but this was our risk mitigation plan supported by mihgen 16:31:20 in case we do not succeed with xarses approach 16:31:34 lets move on take it to the ML, IRC meeting is a wrong place for discussions like that 16:32:30 ok, but we dont have any other items for this meeting 16:32:34 i wrote about it. you did not respond 16:32:45 #topic open discussion 16:33:29 looks like nobody has questions or topics to discuss 16:33:32 right? 16:33:51 if so, let's close meeting and continue to work 16:34:00 thanks everyone 16:34:13 #endmeeting