15:02:06 <Swami> #startmeeting distributed_virtual_router
15:02:07 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Sep 10 15:02:06 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Swami. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:02:09 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:02:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'distributed_virtual_router'
15:02:40 <Swami> mrsmith: ping
15:03:00 <Swami> viveknarashimhan: ping
15:03:31 <Swami> I think people are busy working on the bugs
15:03:57 <Swami> #info Juno 3 released with DVR
15:04:34 <Swami> So people who are testing can make use of the milestone release for testing.
15:05:06 <Swami> We need more people to test it out.
15:05:35 <Swami> #topic DVR update
15:06:12 <Swami> Neutron Juno milestone3 released with DVR
15:06:35 <Swami> Most of the DVR features went into the Juno 3 milestone.
15:07:11 <Swami> At present the DVR team is focussed on bugs for the RC1 release.
15:08:03 <Swami> The targeted blueprints and bugs for Juno RC1 milestone was published.
15:08:06 <Swami> #link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-rc1
15:09:00 <Swami> #topic Bugs
15:09:38 <Swami> All DVR related bugs are logged in the launchpad under the tag l3-dvr-backlog.
15:09:51 <Swami> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.tag=l3-dvr-backlog
15:10:33 <Swami> This link hosts the bugs as well as the backlog items that will be worked on.
15:11:00 <Swami> mrsmith: hi
15:11:12 <Swami> couple of new bugs have been filed recently
15:11:16 <Swami> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1365473
15:11:19 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1365473 in neutron "Unable to create a router that's both HA and distributed" [High,New]
15:11:55 <Swami> This is currently marked as high, but I don't think it is targeted for the Juno, this may be a follow on.
15:12:49 <Swami> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1367039
15:12:51 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1367039 in neutron "dvr fips are not handled properly on l3-agent restart" [Medium,New]
15:13:22 <Swami> dvr fips not handled properly during l3-agent restart.
15:13:46 <Swami> mrsmith: is this related the fg port and namespace not cleaned up.
15:14:12 <mrsmith> not exactly what we are working on
15:14:25 <mrsmith> more related to agent restart
15:14:38 <mrsmith> but improvements/fixes could be applied to both in theory
15:14:52 <Swami> ok, I don't think then it will be targeted for Juno
15:15:29 <Swami> mrsmith: Do you think that we need to add another bug for the fip namespace clean up issue that we are chasing.
15:16:48 <mrsmith> probably - I think we have at least regressed
15:17:04 <mrsmith> as I've said - the fip namespaces were being removed earlier this week
15:17:45 <Swami> mrsmith: then we can wait till we triage this out.
15:18:05 <Swami> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1367588
15:18:07 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1367588 in neutron "When a VM with FloatingIP is directly deleted without disassociating a FIP, the fip agent gateway port is not deleted." [Undecided,Confirmed]
15:19:26 <Swami> All other highs in the list are already worked out and some already commited.
15:20:09 <Swami> That's all I had for bugs.
15:20:22 <Swami> #topic Services
15:21:04 <Swami> With Services, the FWaaS team have completed thier patch to support the DVR for north-south
15:21:33 <Swami> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113359/
15:21:48 <Swami> This patch is ready to be merged
15:22:25 <Swami> As I mentioned in my previous meeting, the fix for LBaaS to work with DVR already had merged.
15:22:41 <Swami> The only services that we need to work on is the VPN.
15:23:04 <Swami> Given the time, it would be a Kilo release
15:24:19 <Swami> That's all for the services.
15:24:58 <Swami> #topic Kilo candidates
15:25:46 <Swami> Last week I mentioned that we can go over some of the backlog items that would be viable candidate for the Kilo release.
15:26:03 <Swami> 1. VPNaaS with DVR
15:26:14 <Swami> 2. Distributed DHCP
15:26:28 <Swami> 3. Fix the current HA solution to work with the DVR for service node
15:26:47 <Swami> 4. Support VLAN for DVR
15:27:10 <Swami> 5. L3 Agent refactor
15:28:08 <Swami> 6. OVS arp responder replacement for the current DVR arp population
15:28:40 <Swami> 7. Multiple external network support for DVR
15:28:53 <Swami> 8. IPv6 support on DVR
15:29:19 <Swami> Hopefully if you all have any other topics you can include it.
15:29:36 <mrsmith> good list Swami
15:29:41 <mrsmith> alot of work there
15:29:43 <Swami> mrsmith: Do you have any other topics
15:29:53 <chuckC> Swami: is this list documented somewhere?
15:30:36 <Swami> chuckC: I will be capturing it in the DVR backlog. We have some captured in DVR backlog but the remaining items need to be included.
15:31:09 <Swami> #topic Open Discussions
15:31:54 <Swami> Any topics that you want to discuss, mrsmith or chuckC
15:32:39 <chuckC> wondering about the future of this meeting
15:33:09 <Swami> chuckC: what is your concern about the future of this meeting
15:33:12 <Swami> I don't get it.
15:33:42 <chuckC> sorry, it has been suggested that this meeting be discontinued and just address issues in L3 meeting
15:34:15 <Swami> I am not sure were you got this information from.
15:34:32 <Swami> Yes we as a team DVR also reports to the L3 sub team meeting.
15:34:45 <mrsmith> I've heard complaints that dvr is discussed too much in the l3-mtg
15:34:50 <Swami> anything that we discuss, will be communicated to the L3 meeting as well.
15:34:52 <mrsmith> since there is a dvr mtg already
15:34:58 <chuckC> It was suggested by someone in the L3 meeting, but I don't recall who
15:35:09 <Swami> This meeting we would like to retain for the DVR specific topics.
15:35:21 <mrsmith> personally, looking at the list above - there is alot to discuss moving forward
15:35:30 <mrsmith> we don't want to suck up too much of the l3-mtg time
15:35:33 <mrsmith> just my vote
15:35:42 <chuckC> ok, well I wasn't suggesting that we do that, I had heard the thought and wondered if things were going that way
15:35:51 <chuckC> I guess not!:)
15:35:52 <mrsmith> good to ask
15:36:05 <mrsmith> chuckC - maybe we are biased !
15:36:11 <Swami> chuckC you are right all smaller subteams should report to the L3 subteam meeting
15:37:16 <chuckC> it's ok, if there's enough work to track in this meeting, I think it's better to continue
15:37:36 <Swami> Ok guys, if no more topics we can end this meeting.
15:38:10 <Swami> #endmeeting