15:04:02 #startmeeting distributed_virtual_router 15:04:03 Meeting started Wed Feb 5 15:04:02 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Swami. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:04:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:04:06 The meeting name has been set to 'distributed_virtual_router' 15:04:42 #topic F2F Meeting 15:05:34 I'll need to join the f2f virtually. 15:05:49 hi folks, as I have mentioned in my previous meeting I am planning to have a face to face meeting on Feb 13th at Palo Alto to get the community feedback on the DVR proposal. The meeting will be from 11.a.m to 1.00p.m 15:06:00 I hope I will be able too 15:06:09 Carl: Yes I will send out a virtual invite to everyone today. 15:06:33 I will also send out a conf. bridge for people to dial in. 15:07:23 safchain: Have anything changed on your end for the DVR proposal, have you updated your document or else should I proceed with what you have in the document. 15:07:56 Swami, I'm currently doing it, I'll finish to update it by this end of the day 15:08:08 so I will send you an email 15:08:08 safchain: thanks 15:08:29 I will also update my document with some minor changes. 15:09:33 * carl_baldwin will now switch to my other client 15:09:34 safchain: As I have mentioned earlier I would like both of our blueprints to be merged to a single blueprint with support for both North-South and East-West without affecting any of the existing services. 15:10:05 Swami, sounds good 15:10:28 safchain: Currently we are also trying to move the SNAT functionality to a specific node, that can be a Network Node. 15:10:53 but retain the floating ip and other routing functionality with the compute node. 15:11:02 Swami, great so the two proposals go to same way 15:11:16 safchain: Swami: are you speaking of updating the HA routers document? 15:11:28 yes I pointed the blueprint 15:11:29 Sorry for not updating the document, I will update it in a couple of days. By thursday I should have updated the document. 15:11:38 Once I update I will send a message to everyone. 15:11:57 carl: Not the HA routers doc, but the DVR doc. 15:12:00 carl_baldwin, Will be used for north-south when VM will not have floating ip 15:12:32 Okay. Sorry, trying to catch up. 15:13:06 carl_baldwin, I will send you the email with the document updated 15:13:14 carl: no worries, since the doc is changing constantly 15:13:15 safchain: great 15:13:15 to everyone 15:14:07 So i think that's all I want to say about the F2F meeting. 15:14:33 carl_baldwin: Do you have any update on the L3_agent consolidation, what is the status and who is working on it. 15:14:45 topic# L3 cosolidation 15:15:19 I haven't seen much about it lately. Let me take a look. 15:15:31 #topic l3 consolidation 15:15:57 Isaku was working on it. 15:16:22 carl: do you tink it is targeted for Icehouse 15:16:30 Looks like the patch has not seen an update since early december. 15:17:12 I will ping Isaku on it. 15:17:33 carl: Thanks 15:18:12 topic; L3 service framework 15:18:57 #topic L3 service framework 15:19:35 carl: Is there any L3 drivers today that drives a hardware router. 15:20:21 I'm not sure what they are. 15:21:00 carl_baldwin, yes? 15:21:11 carl: The reason I am asking is, there are service framework for other services such as LBaaS and there are vendor drivers to drive a physical or virtual device. 15:21:37 similarly is there any driver for L3 to drive the hardware 15:22:00 yamahata: hi 15:23:32 Does anyone know how we should handle the DVR situation when there is a L3 hardware router or VM based router appliance that does the L3 service 15:25:12 Swami: If there is a hardware router doing L3, I think that DVR would not be possible. Or, not easy. 15:28:25 If I recall, Mark's former company used a VM to do L3. It might be a good question to ask him. 15:31:10 Sorry folks i got dropped 15:31:18 did I miss anything 15:31:33 Swami, no 15:31:38 Are we still having problems with free node like the other day? I don't think you miss anything. The meeting went idle when you dropped. 15:31:53 Yes sometimes it drops our session 15:32:11 carl:yes same symptom 15:32:32 safchain: How is your L3 HA going? 15:32:59 I almost sent all the patches related to this feature 15:33:16 amuller, is working on the conntrackd patch 15:33:28 safchain:Ok thanks 15:34:20 safchain: With respect to the L3 HA, all the services that are owned or tied to the L3 agent will it be saved. 15:34:41 Swami, like metadata ? 15:34:55 today FWaaS is tied to L3 agent 15:35:05 safchain: Yes also metadata. 15:35:55 Swami, I have to check for the FWAAS, but if the policies/rules are inserted to each l3, I think it is ok 15:36:32 Swami, for the metadata it is ok 15:36:59 safchain:Thanks 15:37:34 safchain: Are all of the patches on the bp/l3-high-availability topic? 15:38:20 carl_baldwin, yes 15:38:33 bp/l3-high-availability-api 15:38:39 bp/l3-high-availability-keepalived 15:38:44 bp/l3-high-availability-scheduler 15:39:02 #topic General discussion 15:39:25 safchain: I see, so there are a few topics. 15:39:34 carl_baldwin, yes 15:39:39 ... but they are all named similarly. 15:39:50 carl_baldwin, yes same prefix 15:41:09 hi, any topic for discussion on 3rd party test setup.. 15:41:09 Folks I do have a hard stop at 7.45PST, if you don't have any other items I would like to summarize the action items and will end the session 15:41:17 Sorry I missed the meeting last week, had a conflict. There was talk about combining presentations or something. I didn't know what was being combined from the context in the meeting. 15:41:38 wanted to know the requirements and procedure and working of a 3rd party setup 15:41:49 #action safchain: Will update the document 15:42:36 #action Swami: will update the document and will try to get it into a single doc for the F2F review. 15:42:47 Which blueprints were to be combined? 15:43:17 Carl: Right now we have two different blueprints for DVR, one from safchain and one from me. 15:44:01 carl: So it would be great if we could come up with a single blueprint to combine the best of both worlds. 15:44:08 Swami: There's also https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ovs-distributed-router 15:44:54 What is the link to safchain 's blueprint? 15:44:55 amuller: Yes Robin wong is already part of our subteam and we are taking into the consideration the East-West. 15:45:17 And there will also be a new idea by me soon. I'll make a draft for the next meeting, hopefully we'll be able to discuss/consider it 15:45:40 carl_baldwin, no blueprint just a gdoc for now 15:45:44 Basically VRRP A/A, which depends on Sylvain's blueprint 15:45:58 safchain: Thanks, I did see the gdoc. 15:46:08 That clears that up for me. Thanks. 15:46:13 amuller: It would be great if you have any idea pitch it to us as early as possible, because it would be usefull to discuss in the F2F 15:46:40 ok 15:46:44 carl_baldwin, I will update it by the end of the day 15:46:54 safchain: great 15:47:20 amuller: The current sub-team that we are working in is based on the Icehouse summit proposals that was done for East-West and North-South, feel free to join the meeting and communicate with the sub team and we can converge. 15:47:37 Swami: I know you have a hard stop. That is all from me for now. Thanks. 15:47:44 Folks I need to stop. 15:47:56 Thanks for all your input and participation 15:47:58 Have a nice day. 15:48:04 See you all next week. 15:48:08 #endmeeting