17:00:34 #startmeeting Designate 17:00:35 Meeting started Wed Jan 25 17:00:34 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mugsie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'designate' 17:00:41 #topic Roll Call 17:00:53 o/ 17:00:54 ping timsim Kiall 17:01:02 ping sonu 17:01:15 timsim: too quick for me this week :P 17:01:25 pew pew 17:01:43 #topic Announcements 17:01:51 O-3 is this week 17:02:01 I put my candidacy in for Pike PTL: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422765/ 17:02:09 I saw :D 17:02:36 if there is any outstanding patches, please let me know 17:02:55 I wanted to get sonu's YADIFA patch in but, its not ready 17:03:04 so it will have to wait till Pike probably 17:03:17 #topic Action Items 17:03:31 nothing from last week as nothing happened :) 17:03:36 timsim backport 7b9c6ce Merge "[backend:akamai] fix retrieval of tsig_key_name" 17:03:42 that was done, right? 17:04:03 yeah but failed postgres https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419050/ 17:04:14 -_- 17:04:42 Probably because this failed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398749/ 17:05:03 shoot 17:05:06 my bad 17:05:28 #action mugsie look at gate failures in stable/newton + pgSQL 17:05:40 #topic Bug Triage (timsim - recurring) 17:06:12 This is the only new one https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1658974 and it's on my list to look at today https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1658974 17:06:12 Launchpad bug 1658974 in Designate "project_id and zone_transfer_request_id are coming blank when you do openstack zone transfer accept list" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Tim Simmons (timsim) 17:06:16 ++ 17:06:26 that looks wierd 17:06:42 #topic Stable Backport Triage (kiall - recurring) 17:06:47 one sec 17:07:38 #link http://paste.openstack.org/show/596488/ 17:08:04 184544e Use the oslo_utils address parser? 17:08:18 Although you'd probably get into requirements hell 17:08:39 I think it has been in there for a while 17:08:45 I think it is worth it 17:09:05 cool 17:09:11 #action mugsie backport 184544e Use the oslo_utils address parser 17:10:06 #topic Open Discssion 17:10:19 any off agenda items 17:10:20 ? 17:10:30 I am looking at refreshing our core list 17:10:39 if anyone has suggestions could they send them on? 17:10:48 Yeah gotta pop ol' elarson off there 17:10:52 :( 17:10:58 :'( 17:11:40 cool, I think that is it 17:11:41 So we are going to be at the PTG after all 17:11:46 yeah 17:11:55 but not enough to take a room 17:11:58 Yeah. 17:12:08 but there is a few free ones up for booking 17:12:15 * timsim just puts that out into the universe so that maybe someone reads that and decides they want to come talk to us 17:12:41 good call timsim 17:13:01 OK - that it for this wek? 17:13:03 week* 17:13:13 hm 17:13:20 Can I talk about osa with you for a sec? 17:13:24 sure 17:13:51 So I'm trying to think about use cases for how you'd want to deploy a dns server there 17:14:21 OK 17:14:34 I think some people would actually just want one in the Designate container, and they might just do some internal addressing and use that container ip for resolving things 17:14:51 Others are probably going to want to have Dyn or Akamai or something 17:15:01 Someone might want a full production dns server in their cloud 17:15:11 I think those people can sod off. 17:15:34 well, there is more people than you would expect want DNS hosted in cloud 17:15:58 it is an important step 17:16:01 Like Dyn? or like Designate 2 designate? 17:16:19 (if you think back to kialls phased deployment talk in barcellona) 17:16:31 no, just bind / pdns in cloud 17:16:40 and pointing some subdomains at it 17:17:07 Right, so my thought there is: is Bind running next to Designate good enough for that? 17:17:11 Probably not... 17:17:11 as well as the neutron integration, creating PTR + records for ports 17:17:15 is it? 17:17:38 I mean would you want at least two nameservers? Preferably not running in a container? 17:17:57 people might want 3/4 large containers just to run bind 17:18:06 s/containers/instances/ or nodes 17:18:11 yeah. 17:18:23 So I guess the right thing is to maybe leave that up to the deployer. 17:18:26 yeah 17:18:38 But what's missing from the role now is a way to drive pools.yaml with attributes. 17:18:39 unfortunatly they all want random stuff 17:18:44 ah 17:18:50 OK. that would be nice to have alright 17:19:22 hum - I got to bounce real quick - can I ping you in #-dns in a few ? 17:19:30 Sure 17:19:33 k 17:19:36 #endmeeting