17:02:58 #startmeeting Designate 17:03:01 Meeting started Wed Feb 11 17:02:58 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mugsie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:03:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:03:05 The meeting name has been set to 'designate' 17:03:15 #topic Action Items from last week 17:03:57 both seem to have been done - we met last firday, and bug triage is on the agenda :) 17:04:29 #topic Kilo Release Status 17:04:34 #link https://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/kilo-3 17:05:03 anything that should not be there / should be there / issues with the current milestone? 17:05:39 also, Kiall is currently on his way home - we were on the West coast of Ireland for meetings the last 3 days 17:05:49 so he may join in a bit, if he gets home in time 17:06:16 Probably nothing yet to add to k3. I 17:06:32 If you're working on something that's not in there, add it yeah? 17:06:41 paul_glass: did you get a chance to open a bug on your issue last week? 17:06:43 timsim: +1 17:07:52 anything else on this? 17:08:02 rjrjr: I couldn't reproduce it. 17:08:05 so no 17:08:14 okay. 17:08:19 We're good then. 17:08:29 #topic Pools - Where are we? 17:09:03 I was wondering about the database stuff that got started at the mid-cycle. Where's that at? 17:09:08 i think we are in a simliar place as last week - anyone have anything pressing for this? I saw patches from rjrjr 17:09:18 timsim: same as the mid cycle :( 17:09:27 this is on my list for this / early next week 17:09:36 myself and Kiall are finally back in an office 17:09:49 Cool. Is that patch for resiliency ready to review/merge rjrjr ? 17:09:53 i have 2 bugs i'll be working on early next week. looks like vinod1 also has some bugs. 17:10:04 that patch has been ready for almost 2 weeks now. 17:10:06 (i have spend more time in hotels than my own house in the last 6 weeks :( ) 17:10:07 :( 17:10:11 That's what I thought. 17:10:18 rjrjr: I will add it to my list for the morning 17:10:25 what is the review number? 17:10:29 rjrjr: I will look at it later today 17:10:40 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149428/ 17:10:41 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149428/ 17:11:06 mugsie: while you are in the review mode - could you also review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148779/ 17:11:14 #action cores: (mugsie,Kiall,vinod1): get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149428/ merged 17:11:21 vinod1: +1 17:11:24 That is for Adding a new API for abandoning a zone from storage 17:11:34 yeah, definitly 17:11:55 that looked good the last time, I just hadn;t tested it locally yet :) 17:12:14 anything else outstanding on this? 17:12:23 Not from me. 17:12:29 i'm good. 17:12:36 cool 17:12:50 #topic Next sprint 17:12:56 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/designate-documentation-sprint 17:13:11 We should probably start claiming stuff on that, yeah? 17:13:20 That's this Friday 17:13:21 this is next friday, so can people please claim areas this week, so we can get moving stright away 17:13:26 shit 17:13:29 it is this friday 17:13:40 * mugsie has no concpet of time anymore 17:13:56 so, yes, please claim areas today / tomorrow 17:14:36 any questions on ^ ? 17:14:44 I added some more areas to that doc 17:14:47 Will everyone be there? 17:14:59 everyone is free to join - old and new contributors alike :) 17:15:04 I know I will be 17:15:18 not sure about ekarlso , and I think Kiall should be 17:15:19 i will be there 17:15:25 i will be there. 17:15:40 cool. so a reasonably full house 17:15:43 mugsie - do you plan to send an email to the openstack-dev mailing list? 17:15:57 i hadn't, but that is a good idea 17:16:16 #action mugsie email -dev list about sprint 17:16:54 anyone who has input about our docs feel free to jump on and give feedback as wll 17:17:15 even if you are not comfortable about contributing changes to them 17:17:42 anything else on the sprint? 17:17:53 Nope. :) 17:18:03 i'm good. 17:18:24 #topic Elect another core member 17:18:47 so, as people may have seen in the dns channel betsy has resigned from core 17:18:57 In case anybody missed - Betsy left for another group in Rackspace 17:19:07 that leaves us with a spot on designate-core 17:19:38 the traditional openstack way of replacing cores is for someone to send an email to the -dev list nomintating someone 17:19:45 I would like to propose Tim for that spot. He has been reviewing code a lot lately 17:19:54 and the rest of the cores reply +/-1 17:20:02 vinod1: cool 17:20:17 can you send a nomination email to the list? 17:20:19 So do we want to do it the traditional way? 17:20:29 Okay I will send a nomination to the list 17:20:46 I think that as we get more part of openstack we should abide by the forms 17:20:57 it also makes the whole thing transparent :) 17:21:14 is that OK with everyoine? 17:21:30 sounds good. 17:21:33 Sounds good. 17:21:35 #agreed 17:21:42 OK, cool :) 17:22:01 #topic Bug triage (timsim-recurring) 17:22:28 ok, let me get a URL for the bug list 17:22:55 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 17:23:21 how do we want to do this? 17:23:32 start at the top, one at a time? 17:23:39 we divide the bugs up? or do we want to run down through each of them? 17:23:55 ok 17:23:59 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1289444 17:23:59 Launchpad bug 1289444 in Designate "Designate with postgres backend is having issues" [Medium,New] 17:24:00 I think usually this would be a smaller list, so going through them one by one is probably fine. 17:24:40 i think this can move to Triaged 17:25:04 (can someone else change the status - I don't have my 2 factor token on me right now) 17:25:15 #agreed 17:25:21 Done. 17:25:37 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1412431 17:25:37 Launchpad bug 1412431 in Designate "handling format with a display_name containing underscore" [Undecided,New] 17:26:09 This seems like a bug in the example sink handler? 17:26:20 yup 17:26:28 not sure if a bug, or a doc issue 17:26:45 as you are not nessiarly supposed to use the example ;) 17:26:48 Yeah 17:26:59 If you're not supposed to use that, it's probably fine not to fix that. 17:27:16 we could triage it and mark it as wishlist 17:27:24 If that's an issue for you using it, you should solve that issue however you want. 17:27:47 or close it as won't fix - with a description of ^ 17:27:58 i like that approach. 17:27:59 opinions? 17:28:02 I am leaning towards won't fix 17:28:10 cool - wont fix it is 17:28:12 #agreed. 17:28:13 Either one. If you wishlist it, that seems to indicate to me that we're going to supply a handler to use by default. 17:28:20 So I like won't fix. 17:28:30 timsim: care to do the honours? 17:28:33 Sure 17:29:01 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1413806 17:29:01 Launchpad bug 1413806 in Designate "desigate.plugin.DriverPlugin Hides Errors from Developers" [Undecided,New] 17:29:01 timsim: could you add some reasoning too? 17:29:07 vinod1: Yep 17:29:26 ^ needs to be triaged, and marked as med IMHO 17:29:31 medium* 17:29:44 #agreed 17:30:04 #agreed 17:30:16 milestone - kilo3? 17:30:16 #agreed 17:30:25 yup 17:30:54 Done 17:30:57 cool 17:31:02 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1416263 17:31:02 Launchpad bug 1416263 in Designate "Pool Manager's Periodic Sync Needs to Regress States" [Undecided,New] 17:31:06 agreeable group today. 17:31:10 :) 17:31:34 high or critical probably. definitely kilo-3. 17:31:47 high - k3 IMHO 17:31:55 So this is basically, zone is out of sync, periodic sync calls update_status? 17:32:13 k3 high works for me 17:32:13 correct. 17:32:36 We agreed on k3-high? 17:32:39 vinod1: k3 - high ok with you? 17:32:42 #agreed 17:32:43 yes 17:32:46 done 17:32:55 * not by my 17:32:58 me* 17:33:00 Done. 17:33:00 gah 17:33:17 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1416264 17:33:17 Launchpad bug 1416264 in Designate "Pool Manager Needs to Recover from Backend Changes" [Undecided,New] 17:33:22 high or critical - kilo-3 17:33:47 C - K3 17:33:51 k3 - high 17:34:09 I'm cool with Critical too. 17:34:14 Ron - is this when a domain is being updated and pool manager discovers that the domain does not exist on the backend 17:34:21 correct. 17:34:32 or sync finds its not on the backend as well right? 17:34:42 either case. 17:34:52 C - K3 17:35:02 Alright, Critical - K3 it is 17:35:07 #agreed 17:35:10 :) 17:35:17 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1416337 17:35:17 Launchpad bug 1416337 in Designate "Designate server create with concurrent request is not listing all servers even after successful creation." [Undecided,New] 17:35:26 this needs investigation 17:35:38 it was said it was intermitent 17:35:50 has anyone tried to re-create? 17:35:52 it underscores our need for more integration testing too. :( 17:36:15 So maybe we leave this one new? 17:36:31 timsim: yup, thats what I am thining 17:36:37 until we confirm 17:36:42 rjrjr: 100% 17:37:01 Alright, hopefully someone takes a look at it in the next week and we can revisit. 17:37:08 cool 17:37:12 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1418156 17:37:12 Launchpad bug 1418156 in Designate "Policy definition (policy.json) is not honored for admin tenant " [Undecided,New] 17:37:37 this one is not a bug in my opinion - it is lack of docs about the all_tenants flag for the API 17:37:45 #agreed mugsie 17:38:06 #agreed 17:38:17 this looks like an eBay reported bug too. 17:38:22 :) 17:38:36 So 'Not A Bug' and a short explanation that the all tenants flag needs to be used there. And we note that on the docs sprint page? 17:38:51 +1 17:38:56 +1 17:38:58 any issues with ^ ? 17:39:28 ok, that seems like consensuious 17:39:43 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1420359 17:39:43 Launchpad bug 1420359 in Designate "Deleting a recordset returns 204 (Deleted) even though it is async" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Vinod Mangalpally (vinod-mang) 17:39:54 vinod1: you have a patch for ^ do you not? 17:40:00 not yet 17:40:12 oh 17:40:18 i thought i saw a patch 17:40:20 ok. 17:40:24 high - kilo-3 17:40:38 med - k3 17:40:43 med k3 17:40:56 med k3 17:41:03 med - k3 17:41:04 med works 17:41:06 it is then* 17:41:07 Done 17:41:23 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/designate/+bug/1420399 17:41:23 Launchpad bug 1420399 in Designate "A zone's status needs to be updated when its recordsets are updated" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Vinod Mangalpally (vinod-mang) 17:41:46 med - k3 / k-rc1 17:42:11 if we can get it done in k3 great, but not sure if the time will allow for it 17:42:18 med k3 17:42:21 opinions? 17:42:23 med - k3 17:42:31 these are pretty simple fixes IMHO 17:42:45 ok, cool - if it can be done - 100% med - k3 17:42:47 i hope to have a patchset up today 17:42:54 :D 17:42:54 Cool. M K3 it is. 17:43:01 #agreed 17:43:03 and that is the list :) 17:43:26 #topic Open Discussion 17:43:27 quick and painless. like the idea of doing these in this meeting. 17:43:32 rjrjr: me too 17:43:42 any one have anthong out of band? 17:44:20 none from me 17:44:21 Not me. 17:44:23 going... 17:44:25 just a comment - we will be live on Designate for some AZs on Monday. 17:44:37 Icehouse though. :( 17:44:37 rjrjr: congrats :D 17:44:43 thats OK 17:44:48 Cool! 17:44:56 another live install is still cool 17:45:43 anything else? 17:45:59 after that, i'll be able to devote more time to PM and other tasks again. 17:46:04 i'm good. 17:46:21 I think we can all agree on saying thanks to betsy for all her work - if the RAX people can pass it along :) 17:46:32 Absolutely :) 17:46:43 will do 17:47:05 ok - thanks everyone! 17:47:09 #endmeeting