================================ #openstack-meeting: crossproject ================================ Meeting started by ttx at 21:01:49 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/crossproject/2014/crossproject.2014-12-16-21.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * LINK: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/CrossProjectMeeting (ttx, 21:02:12) * Providing an alternative to shipping default config file (ttx) (ttx, 21:03:35) * LINK: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2014-December/005658.html (ttx, 21:03:53) * AGREED: summarize some of these options as doable and take the temperature on the ops ml thread? (ttx, 21:31:49) * ACTION: fungi to take a crack at ml as next step, then see if someone else wants to step up for a spec if people can agree on one particular solution as better than the others for the requested purpose (ttx, 21:32:02) * Next steps for cascading (joehuang) (ttx, 21:32:48) * LINK: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-scale-out-openstack ? (bknudson, 21:33:48) * LINK: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/047470.html (ttx, 21:35:53) * LINK: https://github.com/stackforge/tricircle/blob/master/novaproxy/nova/compute/manager_proxy.py seems to have a lot of copied code from nova? (mikal, 21:42:08) * AGREED: OpenStack isn't ready for the project, and if he want's it ready sooner than later, joehuang needs to help make it ready by working on scaling being coded now. (ttx, 21:54:08) * feel free to continue your POC work, but right now, there seems to be no support from any existing devs, so it may not ever be something accepted (ttx, 21:54:35) * Open discussion & announcements (ttx, 21:57:29) * LINK: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-12-16-09.00.html (ttx, 21:57:54) * LINK: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-specs+branch:master,n,z (ttx, 21:58:27) Meeting ended at 22:02:05 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * fungi * fungi to take a crack at ml as next step, then see if someone else wants to step up for a spec if people can agree on one particular solution as better than the others for the requested purpose People present (lines said) --------------------------- * ttx (95) * dhellmann (52) * fungi (40) * russellb (39) * sdague (35) * Rockyg (31) * morganfainberg (29) * mfisch (24) * joehuang (24) * jogo (20) * dansmith (13) * mestery (11) * jeblair (10) * ildikov (9) * mdorman (9) * bknudson (6) * toabctl (4) * asalkeld (4) * openstack (3) * notmyname (3) * eglynn (3) * anteaya (2) * edleafe (2) * alaski (2) * thingee (1) * SergeyLukjanov (1) * jlk (1) * mikal (1) * ryansb (1) * harlowja (1) * markmcclain (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4