============================ #openstack-meeting-4: craton ============================ Meeting started by jimbaker at 15:01:54 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/craton/2017/craton.2017-03-06-15.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * LINK: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/craton-meetings (jimbaker, 15:01:58) * Roll Call (jimbaker, 15:02:00) * Action Items from Last Meeting (thomasem, 15:03:28) * LINK: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/craton/2017/craton.2017-02-27-15.04.html (thomasem, 15:03:28) * ACTION: thomasem to write BP regarding deployment as a starting point for iterating on a suggested deployment model (thomasem, 15:04:04) * ACTION: jimbaker to map Dusty's requirements to work or existing features of Craton, especially with respect to short-term deliverable (thomasem, 15:04:24) * ACTION: sigmavirus to spec out a testing plan for python-cratonclient in python-cratonclient repo (thomasem, 15:09:50) * Stand-up (thomasem, 15:10:23) * each team member briefly describes what they are working on this week, and describes blockers (if there are any) (thomasem, 15:10:23) * Stand Up :: thomasem (thomasem, 15:10:40) * Stand Up :: fsaad (thomasem, 15:12:26) * Stand Up :: sigmavirus (thomasem, 15:14:14) * Stand Up :: jimbaker (thomasem, 15:15:48) * Stand Up :: sulo (thomasem, 15:16:18) * This Week's Priorities (thomasem, 15:17:40) * LINK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-cratonclient/+bug/1669508 (sulo, 15:19:46) * ACTION: jimbaker plan retrospective meeting for tues mar 7 with appropriate topics (jimbaker, 15:19:57) Meeting ended at 15:34:09 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * jimbaker * jimbaker to map Dusty's requirements to work or existing features of Craton, especially with respect to short-term deliverable * jimbaker plan retrospective meeting for tues mar 7 with appropriate topics * sigmavirus * sigmavirus to spec out a testing plan for python-cratonclient in python-cratonclient repo * thomasem * thomasem to write BP regarding deployment as a starting point for iterating on a suggested deployment model People present (lines said) --------------------------- * thomasem (70) * jimbaker (55) * sigmavirus (43) * sulo (12) * openstack (9) * fsaad (6) * cloudnull (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4