21:13:17 #startmeeting containers 21:13:18 Meeting started Tue Sep 3 21:13:17 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is strigazi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:13:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:13:21 The meeting name has been set to 'containers' 21:13:27 #topic Roll Call 21:13:28 o/ 21:13:31 o/ 21:14:20 #topic Stories/Taks/PatchSets 21:14:54 brtknr: jakeyip Regarding nodegroups 21:15:15 Theodoros is picking things up again, 21:15:28 are you ok with the dirrection if the patches? 21:15:34 let me list them 21:16:15 https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/magnum+branch:master+topic:magnum_nodegroups 21:16:27 ng-{6,7,8,9} 21:16:31 sorry my internet is being weird 21:16:36 o/ 21:17:05 They are in working state, they need some polish and unit tests 21:17:46 brtknr: I was asking if you are positive with the dirrection of nodegroups 21:17:50 https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/magnum+branch:master+topic:magnum_nodegroups 21:17:53 ng-{6,7,8,9} 21:18:31 The functionality is alsmost all there (apart from the scaling master nodes) 21:18:46 which just needs some extra logic for etcd 21:19:08 the built of the infrastructure works 21:20:13 I haven't been following nodegroup closely so it's a bit out of my depth but I'll take a look 21:22:24 no worries, let us know when you have a look 21:25:23 brtknr: you there? 21:26:41 jakeyip: anything you want to discuss? 21:28:17 I am wondering what is state of fcos support? 21:28:54 I see some discussion looks like many people working on/ interested in it 21:29:07 it needs more work 21:29:49 if we make the heat-agent work, it will be fine. 21:31:35 sorry, i'm late 21:32:06 Will it be only supported for U+ or is it possible to be back ported 21:33:21 jakeyip: see https://review.opendev.org/678458 21:33:50 as strigazi said, if we can get heat-container-agent work on fc30, it should be ok, otherwise, there will be quite a lot work 21:34:00 strigazi: yes i am happy with the direction 21:34:14 Ah thanks 21:35:17 sorry there seems to be some kind of network outage in my area... both 21:35:54 it's a bit depressed to see we have to leave the fedora atomic driver away :( 21:36:47 flwang: yes :( 21:36:49 we have put quite a lot effort on that, and unfortunately FC30 is shifting as such an aggressive way 21:38:24 hopefully we can carry the excellent blueprint over 21:39:00 btw, can you guys please review this one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678294/ ? 21:39:10 use fa 29 as the default image for devstack 21:39:31 the ignition files look quite painful to create however... why is it json instead of yaml? 21:39:56 I forgot to click reply of the f29 patch 21:40:12 brtknr: you have to use fcct to convert the original 'script' to the ignition format 21:40:21 and i agree it's really painful 21:40:27 and not easy for debug 21:40:53 because if there is anything wrong with your ignition file, you even can't ssh into the server to debug, that's bad 21:41:06 flwang: we do we have yaml version of all the fragments? 21:41:39 do we* 21:42:07 strigazi: can't https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678294/5/devstack/lib/magnum@277 set the image property? 21:42:30 brtknr: you mean for the 'old' coreos driver? 21:42:46 we don't need the old coreos driver 21:43:01 does not have anything for ignition anyway 21:43:18 scripts that run with the agent can be bash or python 21:43:38 brtknr: the old coreos driver is not based on ignition 21:43:50 strigazi: we can't use python directly, there is no python on fc30 21:44:36 scripts that *run with the agent* can be bash or python 21:44:58 they are executed in the container. 21:44:59 strigazi: ah, yep 21:46:09 flwang: for nodegroups, 21:46:22 brtknr: I was asking if you are positive with the dirrection of nodegroups 21:46:30 flwang: : I was asking if you are positive with the dirrection of nodegroups 21:46:48 flwang: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/magnum+branch:master+topic:magnum_nodegroups 21:46:58 flwang: ng-{6,7,8,9} 21:47:33 strigazi: i haven't got time to review the code yet, TBH 21:47:37 strigazi: yes, happy to hear Theodoros is going to be picking it up again 21:47:43 i will start to review it and leave my comments on 21:48:03 flwang: don't need a detailed review at the moment 21:48:09 but overally, I'd like to see we're on the same direction with other cloud provider's NG features 21:48:23 i suppose we need to ensure compatibility with the upcoming transition to fcos 21:48:53 flwang: it is kind of a rip off of GKR 21:48:54 flwang: it is kind of a rip off of GKE 21:49:12 flwang: can have a quick look? 21:49:31 strigazi: sure, i will 21:49:34 we need a +1 on the direction to put effort to something that will be blocked 21:49:49 strigazi: no problem, i will put it on my priority list 21:49:57 we need a +1 on the direction to *not* put effort to something that will be blocked 21:49:58 and i'd like to see we can get it done asap 21:50:58 the functionality is there apart from master ng resize/addition, it needs some work for etcd but that is a detail compared to the overall direction/changes to the datamodel of magnum 21:51:46 we have a prototype an scaling masters too but we wait for your input. 21:53:01 i have interest for both ng and master resize 21:53:39 master resize is a detail. 21:53:40 Feilong Wang proposed openstack/magnum master: [fedora-atomic][k8s]Disable ssh password authentication https://review.opendev.org/677320 21:53:55 strigazi: i understand that 21:54:32 Feilong Wang proposed openstack/magnum master: [fedora-atomic][k8s]Disable ssh password authentication https://review.opendev.org/677320 21:55:03 i wasnt sure about the extent to which the ng work was ready for review... i would have a play around with it if ttstious would ping me and let me know which parts are ready 21:55:12 as I mentioned in the PTL nomination letter, i'd like to get the things done in next cycle, which includes NG, master containerziation, rolling ugprade and fc30 21:59:05 strigazi: brtknr: jakeyip: anything else we need to discuss? 22:00:20 hmm nothing too pressing... flwang should we change back to europe morning time? 22:00:35 strigazi also suggested this earlier 22:02:06 it seems nz is exactly 12 hours ahead of UTC... 22:03:01 what's the Europe morning time fit you guys? 22:03:17 i prefer 9:00 which means 9:00pm for me 22:04:22 flwang: that sounds good to me, if thats not too late for you 22:05:31 i can't work too late as before :) 22:05:38 thats 10am at CERN 22:05:46 but 9:00pm it's ok for me 22:05:58 strigazi: ^ 22:06:00 I often see you pushing commits when I am starting work in the mornings :) 22:06:04 10am geneva times work perfectly 22:06:32 brtknr: hah, yep, i love work 22:06:46 strigazi: ok, then i will send an email to update the meeting time 22:07:00 jakeyip: where are you based? 22:07:08 09:00 UTC is actually 11:00 Central europe 22:07:27 https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Magnum+Team+Meeting&iso=20190910T09 22:07:29 I'm in Melbourne GMT+10 22:07:38 ah yes thats correct 22:08:19 in the summer I can 0900 UTC, in the winter 08OO UTC due daylight savings time 22:08:32 9 UTC is ok for me too 22:08:39 we have daylight saving as well in nz 22:08:51 so sold? 0900 UTC 22:09:10 yep, we can change it when the daylight saving start :) 22:09:22 great! 22:09:42 so as per https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Magnum+Team+Meeting&iso=20190910T09 22:10:36 end meeting? 22:10:38 anyone know what happened to blizzard? 22:10:38 o/ 22:10:41 LGTM 22:10:44 next question :) 22:10:51 colin-: xD 22:10:59 lol 22:11:00 no lag 22:11:04 bad timing 22:11:07 hehe 22:11:19 nothing to add this week, just saying hello 22:12:18 hi :) 22:12:45 let's end the meeting 22:13:17 #endmeeting